B Do Electrons Completely Leave a Capacitor at T/4 in an LC Circuit?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Antoha1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In an LC circuit, when a capacitor is at T/4, it does not mean that all electrons have left the capacitor; rather, there is an equal quantity of electrons on both plates, resulting in a zero net charge. The oscillation of energy between the inductor and capacitor causes the charge to vary over time, but electrons remain present on both plates. If all electrons were to leave a block of material, it would result in a positively charged state, significantly altering its electrical properties and behavior. The discussion highlights the fundamental principles of charge distribution in capacitors and the implications of electron movement in materials. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing LC circuits and their applications.
Antoha1
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Hello. My question is:
When a capacitor in LC circuit is out of charge (T/4) does that mean that all electrons left the capacitor or that there is the same quantity of electrons on both plates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think?

What would it mean if all the electrons left a block of some material?
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and davenn
Antoha1 said:
Hello. My question is:
When a capacitor in LC circuit is out of charge (T/4) does that mean that all electrons left the capacitor or that there is the same quantity of electrons on both plates?
Think of this like the more familiar battery. The battery has to be in a circuit (red and black leads) to charge it. The answer to your question is along the same lines.
 

Thread 'How to picture the vector potential?'

Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
View full post »
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'

Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'

I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
View full post »

Similar threads

Charging and Discharging of a capacitor in an LC circuit
2
Replies
50
Views
14K
I Capacitor surface charge movement current, relativistic effects
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Why do capacitors not discharge everything immediately in LC circuits?
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Can current flow in an open circuit?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Some questions about capacitor discharging
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Is capacitor energy the electrostatic energy of the whole system?
Replies
9
Views
2K
Why Do Capacitor Plates Have Equal and Opposite Charges?
3
Replies
103
Views
7K
Why isn't a capacitor an open circuit?
Replies
7
Views
4K
B A question about induced current in LC circuits
Replies
4
Views
1K
Prove to me how capacitors in parallel can have the same V across plates
Replies
7
Views
2K