Galilean Transforms-Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter psingh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galilean
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the explosion of an artillery shell, which splits into two fragments of different masses. The context includes concepts from mechanics, specifically relating to momentum and energy conservation during an explosion.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of conservation laws, questioning the nature of the collision as superelastic rather than elastic. There are attempts to set up equations based on momentum and kinetic energy, with some participants expressing confusion over their calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct approach to the problem, emphasizing the importance of considering both momentum and kinetic energy changes. There is an acknowledgment of errors in calculations, and participants are actively working through their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is a focus on understanding the underlying principles rather than simply arriving at a solution.

psingh
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 9.0 kg artillery shell is moving to the right at 100 m/s when suddenly it explodes into two fragments, one twice as heavy as the other. Measurements reveal that 900 J of energy are released in the explosion and that the heavier fragment was in front of the lighter fragment. Find the velocity of each fragment relative to the ground.


Homework Equations



I already have the solution 80 m/s for the heavier and 110 m/s for the lighter but i just want to understand why because i got it wrong on my quiz.


The Attempt at a Solution



i used the elastic collision galilean transforms, but came up with the wrong number.

9kg=x+2x so the heaver is 6kg and the lighter is 3 kg

then i plugged into

mu1'final=(m1-m2)/(m1+m2)*mu1'inital

and

mu2'final=2m/(m1+m2)*mu1'inital

but these were incorrect using 100 m/s as mu1'initial

any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A change of this sort in the flying shell is not an elastic collision, but is referred to as a "superelastic collision", because the total amount of mechanical energy has increased, due to release from an internal energy source (in this case, the chemical explosion; but releasing a compressed spring initially connected to both masses would have a similar effect).

Conservation of linear momentum still applies, but you must now also keep track of the kinetic energy change, as you would in a partially inelastic collision. Keep in mind that the center of mass still moves in the same direction at 100 m/sec before and after the explosion. Consider the "center-of-mass frame" (hence the Galilean relativity reference): before the explosion, the total KE is zero; afterwards, the total KE of the two fragments is 900 J. You know that the two fragments have masses of 3 and 6 kg. You must now solve two equations simultaneously, the one for which the total linear momentum of the fragments is zero in this frame of reference, the second being that the total final KE of the fragments must add to 900 J. You will have the velocities of each fragment in this frame; add back the 100 m/sec velocity of the center-of-mass and you'll have the velocities of the fragments in the "ground" or stationary reference frame.
 
Last edited:
I think i get what you're saying, and it makes sense but I am for some reason still arriving at the wrong answer. can you check my work.

The Consevation of linear momentum is m1v1=m2v2
but if the total has to equal zero then 0=3x+6y where x and y are their respective velocities. making x=-2y

then for the kinetic energy KEi=KEf and KEf=900
so 0=(0.5*3*x^2)+(0.5*6*y^2)=900
simplifying
x^2+2y^2=600 subsituting the x giving (-2y)^2+ 2y^2=600
giving a y=17.32i? i know i messed up but I am not sure exactly where
 
psingh said:
x^2+2y^2=600 subsituting the x giving (-2y)^2+ 2y^2=600

So 4y^2 + 2y^2 = 6y^2 = 600 ,

thus y = 10 m/sec.
 
Oh okay that makes sense! Stupid simple mathematical error on my part for some reason i wrote (-2)^2 = -4.

Thanks for all your help! :)
 
Good! If you check the speeds in the stationary frame, you'll find that the same 900 J change in kinetic energy has occurred there as well. (Measured values of velocity, momentum, and kinetic energy differ between the frames of reference, but the magnitude of changes in these quantities do not. That's also why magnitudes of accelerations and forces also agree between the reference frames in Galilean relativity.)
The center-of-mass frame, though, can often be the easier one in which to make calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K