News What Exactly Is Happening In the Arab/Persian World?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nismaratwork
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Protests in Egypt have escalated into violence, with reports of protesters being beaten and arrested, including journalists. The unrest is characterized as significant but not an outright uprising, contrasting with the recent events in Tunisia. Rumors suggest that President Mubarak's family may have fled the country, raising concerns about potential instability. As protests continue, there are fears that the situation could worsen, particularly with a planned massive demonstration. The emergence of a leaderless youth movement is seen as a critical factor in challenging Mubarak's long-standing regime.
  • #1,151
OmCheeto said:
Wow. I don't know why I thought you were kidding.

Yeah I know, it was quick once they started. As been said: 110 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_(missile)" has been fired by U.S. at 20 targets in Libya, at a cost of $US 150 millions... I guess it was worth it... :rolleyes:

400px-Tomahawk_Block_IV_cruise_missile_-crop.jpg


(=Libya’s AA systems are now kaputt)

I’m sure the "Mad Dog of the Middle East" is not laughing... I guess this date must worry him; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War" :devil:

(Isn’t that 'amazing'/'weird'? :bugeye:)

Anyhow, I don’t like war and violence, but what to do when a nutcase is slaughtering his own people? And you must give Obama credit for; attacking the right country, wait for a UN resolution, getting as many western allies as possible + Arab countries, and letting another allied do the first multilateral strike.

This man is smart; he clearly has more brain cells than GWB... :smile:

As a European, I wish him all the luck in the hunt for the Mad Dog.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,152
Proton Soup said:
however Gaddafi goes out, I'm sure he will look fabulous

Hmmm, I sincerely hope he's only identifiable by DNA.
 
  • #1,154
OmCheeto said:
Wow. I don't know why I thought you were kidding.
Everyone knows I don't have cable, and get all my news from PF, don't you?

Not only do I not have cable, I don't have a TV. So for the same of me and Om, could you folks make your posts *extremely* descriptive? Thanks!
 
  • #1,155
lisab said:
Not only do I not have cable, I don't have a TV. So for the same of me and Om, could you folks make your posts *extremely* descriptive? Thanks!

'k. when i say "going out in style", i mean

zZsgN.jpg
 
  • #1,156
"We would arm the civilians to tackle with the allied forces" that's is the latest statement by Qaddafi than what the hell was that cease fire crap?
 
  • #1,157
FizixFreak said:
"We would arm the civilians to tackle with the allied forces" that's is the latest statement by Qaddafi than what the hell was that cease fire crap?

It was an attempt I suspect, to cause some delay in implementation of UN-1973 or, and this is also possible, it could have been real, then retracted. I'd guess the former, but it hardly matters now, Ghaddafi is finished, his children finished, and and probably the largest war-crimes tribunal upcoming since Nuremberg.
 
  • #1,158
The Mad Dog of the Middle East is soon history. Libya’s anti air force is now 'dismantled', France air force has taken out a large number of tanks, Britain air force is preparing for the most extensive operation since the Falklands. Italy, Denmark & Norway are now preparing their air force to join.

The man is finished.

Still, the GIANT NUTCASE will not give up, http://www.moneyzebra.com/business-news/gaddafi-you-will-be-defeated-as-were-hitler-and-mussolini_5144.html"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfRav0M9T5Q

@lisab & OmCheeto; For now, it get back to you later... :wink:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jqgtUrbVKA
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,159
nismaratwork said:
It was an attempt I suspect, to cause some delay in implementation of UN-1973 or, and this is also possible, it could have been real, then retracted. I'd guess the former, but it hardly matters now, Ghaddafi is finished, his children finished, and and probably the largest war-crimes tribunal upcoming since Nuremberg.

It was a somewhat rhetorical question i was already suspicious about the "cease fire".

Ahhh... long range bombers destroying Ghaddafi's air assets, and armour... life is good.

Its not the time for celebration..., it would be best if Qaddafi would have ran away like Mubarak but now i fear that things might even more unstable
 
  • #1,160
there was a US predator drone attack a few days ago in N. Waziristan, killking mostly civilians.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12769209

drones continue to hover over the area. it must be quite terrorizing.

http://www.sify.com/news/us-drones-...aziristan-news-international-ldul4fijied.html

in the meantime, relations are strained. Pakistan has pulled out of trilateral US-Afghan-Pakistani talks.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-pakistan-us-talks-20110319,0,7877091.story
 
  • #1,161
http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/20/libya.civil.war/index.html?hpt=T1&iref=BN1

Ahh... fond memories of 1986... Al Aziziyah is bombed again.

@Fizix: Sorry man, I can be very literal sometimes, my bad! I agree that it woudl be best if Ghaddafi ran, but he won't, not a chance. Given that reality, and given that he has to die... celebrate. The man is an absolute monster, and his children are as well, but most of all he has too much influence and money.

Remember the last time missiles/bombs hit Tripoli, the international community lost Pan Am. The only way to safety in this, is through his corpse.


@Proton Soup: It's effective sometimes, but now that we're not going after high level targets, but rather Taliban... it's pointless. We need to leave Afghanistan, thus removing the need to do this on such a regular basis. When a word like "drone" has become an adopted epithet in another language, it's time to take notice.

Now I hear talk of training and arming the Libyans... I feel that maybe we didn't learn our Blowback lesson from Afghanistan (the first time). We want Pakistan stable, but as long as we're killing civilians there on a regular basis, it's never going to happen. The best thing the USA can do for the region is LEAVE Afghanistan, now.
 
  • #1,162
Proton Soup said:
there was a US predator drone attack a few days ago in N. Waziristan, killking mostly civilians.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12769209

drones continue to hover over the area. it must be quite terrorizing.

http://www.sify.com/news/us-drones-...aziristan-news-international-ldul4fijied.html

in the meantime, relations are strained. Pakistan has pulled out of trilateral US-Afghan-Pakistani talks.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-pakistan-us-talks-20110319,0,7877091.story

That attack was made on a tribal meeting which was held to solve the dispute about the possession of land which had valuable natural resources and it killed some 40-50 innocent people i don't live in north waziristan so even i have no idea what horror are those people going through and what rage they have inside them against America whose staregy is to first breed terrorists and then try to eliminate them producing even more terrorists in the process that is how they probably treat their "allies".

But then again it would not be unfair to blame Americans for this our government is the real culprit "big fish always eats smaller fish" its the rule of the nature only difference being that the humans are much more wicked in that manner US tried diligently to rescue their citizen from Pakistan but what is our government doing about our own civilians that are being blown up in the name of "war on terror" nothing absolutely nothing they are letting others bully them around so they are the ones who should blamed for all this if we had monkeys running our government we would be in much better conditions at-least the American government works for the well being of their own people but not our leaders they would loans from IMF to charted plains to visit other countries and to meet their royal expenses while having billions of dollars in Swiss banks in their possession

May be i got a little carried away their and but my intent was not to offend any American on this forum i hope others can see that.
 
  • #1,163
FizixFreak said:
That attack was made on a tribal meeting which was held to solve the dispute about the possession of land which had valuable natural resources and it killed some 40-50 innocent people i don't live in north waziristan so even i have no idea what horror are those people going through and what rage they have inside them against America whose staregy is to first breed terrorists and then try to eliminate them producing even more terrorists in the process that is how they probably treat their "allies".

But then again it would not be unfair to blame Americans for this our government is the real culprit "big fish always eats smaller fish" its the rule of the nature only difference being that the humans are much more wicked in that manner US tried diligently to rescue their citizen from Pakistan but what is our government doing about our own civilians that are being blown up in the name of "war on terror" nothing absolutely nothing they are letting others bully them around so they are the ones who should blamed for all this if we had monkeys running our government we would be in much better conditions at-least the American government works for the well being of their own people but not our leaders they would loans from IMF to charted plains to visit other countries and to meet their royal expenses while having billions of dollars in Swiss banks in their possession

May be i got a little carried away their and but my intent was not to offend any American on this forum i hope others can see that.


Well I've been reading about a lot of British munitions being used BTW. Anyhow.
 
  • #1,164
FizixFreak said:
That attack was made on a tribal meeting which was held to solve the dispute about the possession of land which had valuable natural resources and it killed some 40-50 innocent people i don't live in north waziristan so even i have no idea what horror are those people going through and what rage they have inside them against America whose staregy is to first breed terrorists and then try to eliminate them producing even more terrorists in the process that is how they probably treat their "allies".

But then again it would not be unfair to blame Americans for this our government is the real culprit "big fish always eats smaller fish" its the rule of the nature only difference being that the humans are much more wicked in that manner US tried diligently to rescue their citizen from Pakistan but what is our government doing about our own civilians that are being blown up in the name of "war on terror" nothing absolutely nothing they are letting others bully them around so they are the ones who should blamed for all this if we had monkeys running our government we would be in much better conditions at-least the American government works for the well being of their own people but not our leaders they would loans from IMF to charted plains to visit other countries and to meet their royal expenses while having billions of dollars in Swiss banks in their possession

May be i got a little carried away their and but my intent was not to offend any American on this forum i hope others can see that.


Look, offended or not (I'm not) that shouldn't stop you from speaking your mind within forum rules (which you've done). Heck, there was just a big conversation about wanting more international views... well, you're giving one.

Personally, I think you're being too kind to us, but you ALSO have a very enlightened view of the regional monarchies... corrupt as hell. I think you'd also be hard pressed to find more than 1 person in 3 in the USA who would wish that Bush had never been president, or better... had never been born.

I'll just say that I no longer see how these drone strikes are doing anything except causing the potential for blowback later, and making widows and orphans. I've been clear (re: Libya for example) that if civilians have to die to end slaughter, with in limits that's a war. The "war on terror" is like the "war on drugs"... bull and a war on a concept. We're dropping hellfire missiles in Waziristan because we're targeting enemies running from Afghanistan, and rarely is it some Al Qaede operator or bomb-maker... these are targets only relevant to the war in Afghanistan.

Why we're helping to fracture Pakistani society, and kill civilians in the name of a war that should be OVER is beyond me... it's a little taste of Vietnam's lessons unlearned it seems. So, speak up Fizix, as long as you're sticking to facts and the rules, I see no reason why you couldn't start a thread.
 
  • #1,165
drankin said:
Well I've been reading about a lot of British munitions being used BTW. Anyhow.

That's just depressing... still, they use our Tomahawks and related systems... at this point the UK is only nominally a foreign entity from a security standpoint.
 
  • #1,166
nismaratwork said:
I'll just say that I no longer see how these drone strikes are doing anything except causing the potential for blowback later, and making widows and orphans. I've been clear (re: Libya for example) that if civilians have to die to end slaughter, with in limits that's a war. The "war on terror" is like the "war on drugs"... bull and a war on a concept. We're dropping hellfire missiles in Waziristan because we're targeting enemies running from Afghanistan, and rarely is it some Al Qaede operator or bomb-maker... these are targets only relevant to the war in Afghanistan.

This is what really happens when the governments that are elected to RUN the state end up RULING the state and eventually in the thirst for absolute control they want to impose their will on other states the ones that are easily suppressed become ALLIES others are labeled as terrorists and extremists

"Of the people, for the people, by the people"

Now that's an ideology that is to good to be imposed in the world and this ideology is quite similar to the concept of governance in ISLAM but unfortunately it is not implemented on one inch of this world not even in ANY of the Islamic state i guess some things are just too good to be true some people don't see the beauty of it and some despite having everything in front of their eyes will never adapt them i am talking about the MUSLIMS yes the MUSLIMS! and that is why they or should i say we are at the bottom of the pit in every walk of life i am not telling you a story on the rise and fall of Muslims i am just trying to tell you about the defects in the "systems" on which the governance of every single state is based and those defects only lead up to what we see today.

Having an authority doesn't empowers you but instead it puts a burden on you which is to make sure the well being of your people and their happiness but it is something we don't see in the real world and we never will i think nobody can deny the fact that both that the biggest threat to man kind is MAN himself because the man sees the authority as a power not as a responsibility and that is what drives them to do what the US and other SUPER POWERS have done in their respective times in dark times they needed no excuse but now of course how can they do all that without labeling as you know what and quite ironically before this global war on terrorism began the world was much more peaceful then the present times wasn't it?

I sit here wondering whether all of this would make any sense to you most likely not but these are just my views.
 
  • #1,167
drankin said:
Well I've been reading about a lot of British munitions being used BTW. Anyhow.

I guess that you are trying to say that British weapons are being used in drone attacks well if that's so i am not even remotely surprised.
 
  • #1,168
FizixFreak said:
This is what really happens when the governments that are elected to RUN the state end up RULING the state and eventually in the thirst for absolute control they want to impose their will on other states the ones that are easily suppressed become ALLIES others are labeled as terrorists and extremists

"Of the people, for the people, by the people"

Now that's an ideology that is to good to be imposed in the world and this ideology is quite similar to the concept of governance in ISLAM but unfortunately it is not implemented on one inch of this world not even in ANY of the Islamic state i guess some things are just too good to be true some people don't see the beauty of it and some despite having everything in front of their eyes will never adapt them i am talking about the MUSLIMS yes the MUSLIMS! and that is why they or should i say we are at the bottom of the pit in every walk of life i am not telling you a story on the rise and fall of Muslims i am just trying to tell you about the defects in the "systems" on which the governance of every single state is based and those defects only lead up to what we see today.

Having an authority doesn't empowers you but instead it puts a burden on you which is to make sure the well being of your people and their happiness but it is something we don't see in the real world and we never will i think nobody can deny the fact that both that the biggest threat to man kind is MAN himself because the man sees the authority as a power not as a responsibility and that is what drives them to do what the US and other SUPER POWERS have done in their respective times in dark times they needed no excuse but now of course how can they do all that without labeling as you know what and quite ironically before this global war on terrorism began the world was much more peaceful then the present times wasn't it?

I sit here wondering whether all of this would make any sense to you most likely not but these are just my views.


I think you'd be surprised, I understand you clearly; you strike me as neither pessimist nor optimist, just a realist. You have your ideals, but you don't see them being implemented... I think many people around the world find themselves in the same position, myself included.
 
  • #1,169
Earlier in the thread I said to watch Russia. (my bold)

http://au.news.yahoo.com/queensland/a/-/mp/9050306/west-strikes-libya-gaddafi-forces-choke-misrata/

"Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said a U.N. resolution authorising military action in Libya resembled "medieval calls for crusades" and China stepped up criticism as Western forces prepared to switch from air strikes to air patrols."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,170
WhoWee said:
Earlier in the thread I said to watch Russia. (my bold)

http://au.news.yahoo.com/queensland/a/-/mp/9050306/west-strikes-libya-gaddafi-forces-choke-misrata/

"Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said a U.N. resolution authorising military action in Libya resembled "medieval calls for crusades" and China stepped up criticism as Western forces prepared to switch from air strikes to air patrols."

You did indeed, several times... the first I guffawed, the second not so much, and now I'm all ears.

This... is very unfortunate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,171
This is new...

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/03/22/syria.protests/index.html?hpt=T2

Syria arrests opposition leader... it's almost as if these nations are ASKING for more trouble.

Meanwhile Yemen is an even more exciting place *heavy sarcasm* lately. I can't wait to see what kind of fanatical regime emerges from THAT rubble...

and oh yes, it seems a group of police protestors fired the Ministry of Interior building in Cairo!

*rubs temples*

This along with Christchurch, Japan, Sudan, Cote D'Ivorie, Libya, Tunisia, Bahrain... ooooh sweet aspirin.
 
  • #1,172
Could be just another ploy or maybe a possibility.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/07/us-libya-congress-idUSTRE7266H720110307"

The nightly news is also reporting that two of Gaddafi's sons may have been killed by a Libyan pilot on a kamikaze mission. Strange times.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,173
The Mad Dog has barked again, no need for translation... "Europe"... "Glorious Victory"...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dwPtIEN8iU

Maybe west should change tactics and bomb the area around the mental patient with Aripiprazole...?
 
  • #1,174
Borg said:
Could be just another ploy or maybe a possibility.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/07/us-libya-congress-idUSTRE7266H720110307"

The nightly news is also reporting that two of Gaddafi's sons may have been killed by a Libyan pilot on a kamikaze mission. Strange times.

Wow...


I thnk your last two words sum up the last few months quite nicely.

@DA: What a jerk... understatement I know.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,175
nismaratwork said:
This is new...

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/03/22/syria.protests/index.html?hpt=T2

Syria arrests opposition leader... it's almost as if these nations are ASKING for more trouble.

Meanwhile Yemen is an even more exciting place *heavy sarcasm* lately. I can't wait to see what kind of fanatical regime emerges from THAT rubble...

and oh yes, it seems a group of police protestors fired the Ministry of Interior building in Cairo!

*rubs temples*

This along with Christchurch, Japan, Sudan, Cote D'Ivorie, Libya, Tunisia, Bahrain... ooooh sweet aspirin.

yeah, the libyan war makes a news diversion, so that you can go bust heads without attracting attention. israel is using it to go on some rampaging of its own right now. same as they did when they broke the gazan ceasefire in 2008 during the presidential elections. then, when news diverts away from the election, all people see is gazans firing rockets into israel.

some of our actions in pakistan may be also taking advantage of the news cycle. such is strife, eh?
 
  • #1,176
Proton Soup said:
yeah, the libyan war makes a news diversion, so that you can go bust heads without attracting attention. israel is using it to go on some rampaging of its own right now. same as they did when they broke the gazan ceasefire in 2008 during the presidential elections. then, when news diverts away from the election, all people see is gazans firing rockets into israel.

some of our actions in pakistan may be also taking advantage of the news cycle. such is strife, eh?

Now THAT is much more realistic in my view.
 
  • #1,177
nismaratwork said:
This is new...

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/03/22/syria.protests/index.html?hpt=T2

Syria arrests opposition leader... it's almost as if these nations are ASKING for more trouble.

Meanwhile Yemen is an even more exciting place *heavy sarcasm* lately. I can't wait to see what kind of fanatical regime emerges from THAT rubble...

and oh yes, it seems a group of police protestors fired the Ministry of Interior building in Cairo!

*rubs temples*

This along with Christchurch, Japan, Sudan, Cote D'Ivorie, Libya, Tunisia, Bahrain... ooooh sweet aspirin.

]No doubt they are asking for trouble saudi government is also expecting such an outbreak and there is no reason that they shouldn't

http://www.utopiaforums.com/boardthread?id=politics&thread=42931&showdeleted=true

It seems like they want to settle every thing in peace but they are not giving what the public really wants to have throwing piles of money at the Saudi people may not work cause they are not short of that and of course the shias living in the country may also see this as a opportunity to fight for their rights.


Proton Soup said:
yeah, the libyan war makes a news diversion, so that you can go bust heads without attracting attention. israel is using it to go on some rampaging of its own right now. same as they did when they broke the gazan ceasefire in 2008 during the presidential elections. then, when news diverts away from the election, all people see is gazans firing rockets into israel.

some of our actions in pakistan may be also taking advantage of the news cycle. such is strife, eh?

Wow i am surprised that people in the west actually think that way and to some extent i am happy that someone can actually see what Israel has been doing to the Palestine people as and GOD knows what kid of wicked plans do they have in their minds now..., i think the silence of the Arab leaders on the brutality of Israel on Palestine is also a reason that the Arab people have developed a collective rage against their leaders only Muslim country that speaks openly on the subject is IRAN and they are labeled as "a nuclear threat" and if you look at the world map Israel is surrounded by all the Muslim nations but none of them really speaks up against them.
 
  • #1,178
Oh dear, a large explosion outside of a bus in Jerusalem... this could lead to an some ugly reprisals.
 
  • #1,179
WTF! :mad::mad::mad:

France 24: ISRAEL BREAKING NEWS - Bomb explodes at crowded bus stop in Jerusalem, many casualties
 
  • #1,180
Yep... first time in over 4 years, you have to wonder if Ghaddafi was somehow behind this, or if it's just incredibly bad timing on the part of another group.
 
  • #1,181
nismaratwork said:
Yep... first time in over 4 years, you have to wonder if Ghaddafi was somehow behind this, or if it's just incredibly bad timing on the part of another group.

My guess is the "Libyan Strongman" has his hands full right now. Perhaps FizixFreak is on target?

"i think the silence of the Arab leaders on the brutality of Israel on Palestine is also a reason that the Arab people have developed a collective rage against their leaders only Muslim country that speaks openly on the subject is IRAN and they are labeled as "a nuclear threat" and if you look at the world map Israel is surrounded by all the Muslim nations but none of them really speaks up against them. "
 
  • #1,182
WhoWee said:
My guess is the "Libyan Strongman" has his hands full right now. Perhaps FizixFreak is on target?

"i think the silence of the Arab leaders on the brutality of Israel on Palestine is also a reason that the Arab people have developed a collective rage against their leaders only Muslim country that speaks openly on the subject is IRAN and they are labeled as "a nuclear threat" and if you look at the world map Israel is surrounded by all the Muslim nations but none of them really speaks up against them. "

It's possible, I really don't know. I didn't expect a bombing in Israel at this time frankly, it would be a distraction for those peacefully attaining freedom of some measure, and a distraction for the Libyan opposition. Beyond that... who knows?
 
  • #1,183
FizixFreak said:
Wow i am surprised that people in the west actually think that way and to some extent i am happy that someone can actually see what Israel has been doing to the Palestine people as and GOD knows what kid of wicked plans do they have in their minds now..., i think the silence of the Arab leaders on the brutality of Israel on Palestine is also a reason that the Arab people have developed a collective rage against their leaders only Muslim country that speaks openly on the subject is IRAN and they are labeled as "a nuclear threat" and if you look at the world map Israel is surrounded by all the Muslim nations but none of them really speaks up against them.


i think i am very unusual, at least compared to most here in the USA. the only reason i am somewhat familiar with the http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/12session/A-HRC-12-48.pdf" is that i became somewhat curious a few years ago with what i perceived as a rather condescending, paternalistic, borderline overtly racist attitude from a journalist in the mainstream press. so, i start paying attention, and eventually i come across scholars like Mr. Finkelstein.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpMpHgw7yVk

and some excellent sources of information like Mondoweiss. http://mondoweiss.net/

but you won't hear about it much in mainstream press in the US, as it self-censors. even mentioning it here is somewhat dangerous, as it's not politically correct to talk about it. but i think most are simply not interested, or just don't have the time to devote to figuring out exactly what is going on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,184
nismaratwork said:
Oh dear, a large explosion outside of a bus in Jerusalem... this could lead to an some ugly reprisals.

it was http://mondoweiss.net/2011/03/here-is-ayman-and-here-is-his-horse.html" . it's been ugly for quite a while. they had even just passed an apartheid law just before this bus. how on Earth israel can start implementing Jim Crow and have it go unnoticed in the US is bizarre to me. i think they are high on power at the moment, see an opportunity to cleanse while the world is otherwise preoccupied, and are simply going to go with it because no one will stop them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,185
Proton Soup said:
it was http://mondoweiss.net/2011/03/here-is-ayman-and-here-is-his-horse.html" . it's been ugly for quite a while. they had even just passed an apartheid law just before this bus. how on Earth israel can start implementing Jim Crow and have it go unnoticed in the US is bizarre to me. i think they are high on power at the moment, see an opportunity to cleanse while the world is otherwise preoccupied, and are simply going to go with it because no one will stop them.

Let me rephrase that: Ignoring the plight of the Palestinians for whom I have shockingly little sympathy when contrasted with how much I know about the misery of their daily lives... this could be ugly in an international setting.

Your points are interesting, but I have little pity for a group that is refused even by their so-called brothers, and frankly... lost. History has winners and losers, and these are the losers in this historical process. Pining over their slow and rather nasty destruction as a people is upsetting, but not as you say, not new, generally not appreciated, and finally:

People pick sides. Personally, I side with Israel, Aparthaid, walls, assasinations and all. It's a hard part of the world, and survival is both an ends and a means in and of itself. We could bicker about details and motivations, but I prefer to boil it down: The Palestinians are a trapped diaspora; trapped by Israel, by their own inability to accept total loss, and by every Arab neighbour who wants them in their country ALMOST as much as venemous serpents.

The right, and wrong of the issue is not something I'm concerned with in this case, only the Realpolitik. I figure I should be blunt here, I recognize the atrocities on all sides, I simply don't care much anymore; I've seen worse.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,186
nismaratwork said:
Let me rephrase that: Ignoring the plight of the Palestinians for whom I have shockingly little sympathy when contrasted with how much I know about the misery of their daily lives... this could be ugly in an international setting.

Your points are interesting, but I have little pity for a group that is refused even by their so-called brothers, and frankly... lost. History has winners and losers, and these are the losers in this historical process. Pining over their slow and rather nasty destruction as a people is upsetting, but not as you say, not new, generally not appreciated, and finally:

People pick sides. Personally, I side with Israel, Aparthaid, walls, assasinations and all. It's a hard part of the world, and survival is both an ends and a means in and of itself. We could bicker about details and motivations, but I prefer to boil it down: The Palestinians are a trapped diaspora; trapped by Israel, by their own inability to accept total loss, and by every Arab neighbour who wants them in their country ALMOST as much as venemous serpents.

The right, and wrong of the issue is not something I'm concerned with in this case, only the Realpolitik. I figure I should be blunt here, I recognize the atrocities on all sides, I simply don't care much anymore; I've seen worse.

awesome. then we are on different sides. if by some quirk of fate, israel suddenly finds itself on the losing side, i don't want to hear a peep from you. all you understand is power and aggression. we tried appeasement once in europe, and it was a tragic failure. I'm not falling for it again. and I'm not having sympathy for people that learned nothing from their own tragedies except how great it is to be the aggressor.
 
  • #1,187
Proton Soup said:
awesome. then we are on different sides. if by some quirk of fate, israel suddenly finds itself on the losing side, i don't want to hear a peep from you. all you understand is power and aggression. we tried appeasement once in europe, and it was a tragic failure. I'm not falling for it again. and I'm not having sympathy for people that learned nothing from their own tragedies except how great it is to be the aggressor.

I agree PS, but we must take a clear stand against all aggression. I think the main problem here is that 'outsiders' is picking sides and blaming everything on the other part.

We will never solve this problem in that manner... and "wishing for extinction" of millions of human beings is something I never expected to read on PF, which otherwise is full of clever minds. This is not Germany in the 1930’s.

The rest of the world needs to take a clear stand against all aggression, no matter which part is guilty, and use all civil means available to isolate the Hawks and reward the Doves (they exist on both sides).

This two-thousand-year-old conflict cannot be solved with violence and aggression, not even if the antagonists continue along this path for another thousand years.

Violence and aggression generates more religious radical fundamentalism, which generates more aggression, which generates more fundamentalism, etc, etc, etc, etc ...

It’s very hard for diplomatic negotiations if one believes he has the "Highest Power" on his side – and therefore can’t be wrong.

This is a political problem – not religious.
 
  • #1,188
Proton Soup said:
i think i am very unusual, at least compared to most here in the USA. the only reason i am somewhat familiar with the http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/12session/A-HRC-12-48.pdf" is that i became somewhat curious a few years ago with what i perceived as a rather condescending, paternalistic, borderline overtly racist attitude from a journalist in the mainstream press. so, i start paying attention, and eventually i come across scholars like Mr. Finkelstein.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpMpHgw7yVk

and some excellent sources of information like Mondoweiss. http://mondoweiss.net/

but you won't hear about it much in mainstream press in the US, as it self-censors. even mentioning it here is somewhat dangerous, as it's not politically correct to talk about it. but i think most are simply not interested, or just don't have the time to devote to figuring out exactly what is going on.

For a little time i was actually happy that there might be more people who think this way but it was too good to be true it doesn't makes much difference though Israel will stop at nothing to completely decimate the Palestine people and then quite ironically the ones who try to defend themselves will be called "terrorists" i have no idea how much hatred it takes to do such things i am not as disgusted as i am shocked...,shocked not only at the actions of Israel but even more shocked on the impotency of the Arab leaders.

I can talk a lot about what Israel is doing but this all could have been avoided if the Arab world would not have abandoned the Palestine people so they are the real culprits and its sad to know that this stuff is almost like "taboo" to be talked about its even more sad that even media is in on this like you said there are people who don't really care about this and accept what they are shown but who can blame them they are just trying to carry on with their lives but i have to take my hats off to you who really looks into this matter and for that i really respect you:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,189
This is all usa and isreal fault if it weren't for them we could live in peace without the everyday interferences in our daily lives
 
  • #1,190
nismaratwork said:
Let me rephrase that: Ignoring the plight of the Palestinians for whom I have shockingly little sympathy when contrasted with how much I know about the misery of their daily lives... this could be ugly in an international setting.

Your points are interesting, but I have little pity for a group that is refused even by their so-called brothers, and frankly... lost. History has winners and losers, and these are the losers in this historical process. Pining over their slow and rather nasty destruction as a people is upsetting, but not as you say, not new, generally not appreciated, and finally:

People pick sides. Personally, I side with Israel, Aparthaid, walls, assasinations and all. It's a hard part of the world, and survival is both an ends and a means in and of itself. We could bicker about details and motivations, but I prefer to boil it down: The Palestinians are a trapped diaspora; trapped by Israel, by their own inability to accept total loss, and by every Arab neighbour who wants them in their country ALMOST as much as venemous serpents.

The right, and wrong of the issue is not something I'm concerned with in this case, only the Realpolitik. I figure I should be blunt here, I recognize the atrocities on all sides, I simply don't care much anymore; I've seen worse.

Wow Nismar i have to say if you were born in the early 1900s and in Germany you would have been an excellent NAZI:biggrin:

I am sure that with such views you would not be against the Nazis because they probably did the same they supported the side that was in control not the side that was morally right..., for some reason i think that you are trying to be a TOUGH GUY you know the ones that act really blunt and aggressive to make other people think that they are real BADASS the reason i say this is because you don't really seem like a person who would support Israel on this subject you seem much more reasonable to me.
 
  • #1,191
elabed haidar said:
This is all usa and isreal fault if it weren't for them we could live in peace without the everyday interferences in our daily lives

If you see me killing you brother and your brother is crying for help but you don't help him you just stand there and watch so who would be held responsible for you brother's death?
 
  • #1,192
we are laready with them we fought isreal in 2006 in lebanon i assume you knowabout that what can you expect from a small country like us to do go to libya and fight if our government which doesn't exist anyway was islamic like iran we could have destroyed isreal from a really long long time ago
 
Last edited:
  • #1,193
Funny, Iran is Islamic and they have a nuclear program. Nonetheless, Israel is still there. I wonder if Khomeini realizes that without Israel as a scapegoat, the Iranians might start looking further at their own leader and the crimes he's committed.
 
  • #1,194
elabed haidar said:
This is all usa and isreal fault if it weren't for them we could live in peace without the everyday interferences in our daily lives

Care to label this opinion - or support with facts?
 
  • #1,195
emphasis mine
elabed haidar said:
This is all usa and isreal fault if it weren't for them we could live in peace without the everyday interferences in our daily lives

I could easily exchange that to:
This is all Iran and Hamas fault if it weren’t for them we could live in peace without the everyday interferences in our daily lives.

And it would be exactly as valid.

350px-Gilad_Shalit_on_Hamas_poster.jpg


elabed haidar said:
we are laready with them we fought isreal in 2006 in lebanon i assume you knowabout that what can you expect from a small country like us to do go to libya and fight if our government which doesn't exist anyway was islamic like iran we could have destroyed isreal from a really long long time ago

Don’t you understand? The reason you don’t have a government is because not so smart 'opinions' like this...

Israel has the largest army in the region, IDF possesses top-of-the-line weapons, is widely believed to possesses weapons of mass destruction, and to be one of four nuclear-armed countries, and is supported by the last nuclear superpower on the planet – and your goal is to DESTROY Israel!? :eek:

Don’t you understand how ridiculous this is? Even if you (by a miracle) would get the similar military strength – the result would "only" be WW3 and a complete destruction of the planet.

Is this something you dream about?? :bugeye:

Please, stop the 'revolutionary dreams' and come back to earth, and look for realistic long-term solutions, and lay down the guns – and start talking!
 
  • #1,196
Proton Soup said:
awesome. then we are on different sides. if by some quirk of fate, israel suddenly finds itself on the losing side, i don't want to hear a peep from you. all you understand is power and aggression. we tried appeasement once in europe, and it was a tragic failure. I'm not falling for it again. and I'm not having sympathy for people that learned nothing from their own tragedies except how great it is to be the aggressor.

You're entitled to your view, and clear anger, but understand that I'm not moved. I really don't care if I'm a terrible person or not, I simply evaluate situations individually, not based on some dream. Your talk of appeasement and reference to WWII however, is unseemly. If you want to rant in response to my honest and personal appraisal, try those PM's you hate; it's far more appropriate for that. Here, you might want to stick to something less than a diatribe.

I believe that once you confine yourself to one side, you're doomed. You can support a side or outcome, but making it purely binary is to ignore complexity that is quite informative.

@FizixFreak: Israel is acting in a fairly monstrous fashion, and the Palestinians are doing the same. As you say, the people who have NO excuse are the Arab nations who make it almost impossible for a Palestinian to get so much as a work visa; to them this is just a distraction so they can steal more from their people. Why, if Israel were no longer an issue, people might notice their own dictators like Mubarak, Qaddafi, Assad... oh wait, they did!

I know you strongly disagree with my view Fizix, but I'm not going to lie to you or anyone else about it. I'm also not going to dress it up in a moral justification; I think you understand that the ME is not a gentle place at the level of governments (the people are great). You can't be soft in the ME and expect to survive, and with nations carved by the French, British, and sometimes the USA... well... it's amazing things have held this long.

I think that once this all settles down and the people have the governments they want (or something closer), Israel is going to actually be FORCED to change internal policy, or risk war. Yes, it's a war they'd probably win, but at what cost in the short and long term?

My point: No one is clean in this, no one is innocent, nobody is purely a victim or victimizer; it's a complex relationship of hatred, fear, frustration, and callous abuse by those in high office or the very rich.

@Char.Limit: I doubt that Iran is so far-sighted. After all, they have to know that Israel will strafe their metropolis before they allow a nuclear armed Iran. There's no talking to either nation, both have set themselves on a collision course.


This is all a miserable state of affairs, but all the international community has done is drag this out endlessly for the sake of spice and silk, salt and gold, and now strategic positioning and oil. What should we expect form ALL sides of a conflict when one empire, secular, Islamic, Christian, other... all keep raiding the SAME places? Turkey can barely hold, and they had Ataturk... I see little hope for the future there. Above all, I'm disgusted by the behavior of Arab nations who claim the Palestinians as their brothers, but in practice reject them.

I'll never forget in Kuwait, the only Palestinians you saw (RARELY) were poor...POOR! In Kuwait! On work visas that had to be constantly renewed, because as one friend explained, "they are like mad dogs." What!? If that's how their brothers see them, how does anyone expect Israel to do anything except make that perception reality, and "win" that way?

Hell, look at Egypt, where the military just banned protests... almost as though they hadn't learned a lesson.

What will happen in Syria? What does that mean for Lebanon? Israel is an issue on all sides, pro, anti, and neutral, but it's not the immediate issue until these Arab and Persian thieving royal families get the boot from their own people. That gives a moral high-ground to the Arab and Persian nations, who given time will have forged a real government that can represent their interests.

I just wonder, one that happens, will they still PRETEND to care about the Palestinians?
 
  • #1,197
DevilsAvocado said:
emphasis mine


I could easily exchange that to:
This is all Iran and Hamas fault if it weren’t for them we could live in peace without the everyday interferences in our daily lives.

And it would be exactly as valid.

350px-Gilad_Shalit_on_Hamas_poster.jpg




Don’t you understand? The reason you don’t have a government is because not so smart 'opinions' like this...

Israel has the largest army in the region, IDF possesses top-of-the-line weapons, is widely believed to possesses weapons of mass destruction, and to be one of four nuclear-armed countries, and is supported by the last nuclear superpower on the planet – and your goal is to DESTROY Israel!? :eek:

Don’t you understand how ridiculous this is? Even if you (by a miracle) would get the similar military strength – the result would "only" be WW3 and a complete destruction of the planet.

Is this something you dream about?? :bugeye:

Please, stop the 'revolutionary dreams' and come back to earth, and look for realistic long-term solutions, and lay down the guns – and start talking!

I would normally agree, but the Palestinians were betrayed so completely by the PLO under Arafat, and their neighbours... how can they possibly expect talk to work? The Israelis are just tired of being bombed and dealing with people who HAVE become ruled by radicals, after being ruled by criminals.

Until the USA, Russia, China, and EU all sit down with REAL governments in the ME, and place Jerusalem into some kind of multinational custodianship, then adress the issue of the Palestinian diaspora... there is going to be no peace. I'm not religious, but I've never spoken to a religious Israeli, or Arab who doesn't think that Jerusalem should be theirs... the Palestinians rarely come up except as props.

I think people forget just how much has been stolen from the Palestinian people by their own leaders, and after a couple generations of being radicalized by anyone with an agenda... of course this is the way.

Think of what it took to (mostly) resolve the issue of the IRA, and that was with governments that weren't ad hoc revolutionary kleptocracies. We're not going to see peace in the ME in our lifetimes, if ever.

That is why I choose a side in some ways, as Proton so eloquently stated.
 
  • #1,198
G-d, this is truly sick:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/23/libya.war/index.html?hpt=T1

CNN said:
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
NEW: Coalition effort is not "a land invasion," according to U.S. official
Hospital patients and doctors paralyzed by fear
No military participation by Jordan
In the last day, the coalition has flown 175 sorties over Libya, official says
[----]

Tripoli, Libya (CNN) -- Despite five days of coalition airstrikes, troops loyal to Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi continued Wednesday to terrorize residents of the besieged rebel-held city of Misrata.

One witness said Gadhafi's forces had attacked the city's main hospital, where 400 people -- about half of them patients -- were located. The push began at 8 p.m. (2 p.m. ET), when "heavy tanks for Gadhafi troops start attacking the hospital -- the bombs falling here 20 meters (66 feet) around us," said one person inside the hospital. He said two deaths had occurred "around the hospital."

At one point, shelling occurred without respite for 40 minutes, he said. "Now, fortunately, no more shelling, but the situation is so serious that all the teams here -- the doctors, the patients -- are paralyzed, scared."

He called for international intervention to protect the civilians inside the institution. "Nobody can work here," he said. Ambulances were not able to leave the hospital, which had lost its electricity and was using generator power, he said.

During the last day, the international coalition has flown 175 sorties over Libya -- 113 of them by U.S. planes and the remainder from other nations participating in the U.N.-backed mission, U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Gerard Hueber told reporters Wednesday.

This is just a taste of what Ghaddafi would have done to Benghazi... I'm sorry, he's a monster beyond the norm... this is deranged behaviour that will turn his own people not just against him, but suicidally so. Who wouldn't die to protect their home from meaningless assault, or their wounded from shelling!?

There is a glimmer in the dark however...

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03/23/us.gadhafi.inner.circle/index.html?hpt=T1

CNN said:
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
U.S. officials: Gadhafi's inner circle reaching out to other Arab states and U.S.
Officials say none of the contacts has indicated Gadhafi was ready to leave
"They are indeed reaching out, but it's not clear to what end," one official says
Gadhafi's brother-in-law has called the State Department almost daily, officials say
 
  • #1,199
Do we have any Syrian members who can shed some light on what's going on in Syria? It doesn't look like a revolt or call for Assad to go, just reform. I'm not so clear on my sources however, and I don't trust something like CNN for this.
 
  • #1,200
nismaratwork said:
You're entitled to your view, and clear anger, but understand that I'm not moved. I really don't care if I'm a terrible person or not, I simply evaluate situations individually, not based on some dream. Your talk of appeasement and reference to WWII however, is unseemly. If you want to rant in response to my honest and personal appraisal, try those PM's you hate; it's far more appropriate for that. Here, you might want to stick to something less than a diatribe.

I believe that once you confine yourself to one side, you're doomed. You can support a side or outcome, but making it purely binary is to ignore complexity that is quite informative.

i'm not confined to one side. but i am vehemently opposed to the one-sided representation this gets in the US media. and i am appalled and sickened that my country and its treasury is being used to support some rather disgusting things. so yes, I'm going to ***** about it from time to time. i don't normally try to rant and shove it down peoples' throats, but i am going to bring up issues from time to time in addition to egypt, libya, bahrain, pakistan, etc.

i'm also not unrealistic. i don't expect or hope for a destruction of israel. i do think it is reasonable to get them to pull back to the 1967 borders, tho. a two-state solution is not unreasonable and it can work.

now, I'm sorry you're offended by my reference to appeasement, but I'm not going to take back what i said, either. because i think that is exactly what is going on. i still remember from years ago when the taking of the Golan Heights was justified because of it being strategic militarily. but it's obvious now that all the land taken in 67 will become settlements. and when, maybe even before, that land is filled, they will be looking to expand. already this year, the defense minister was making noise about invading lebanon. they need only create an excuse like they did in 2008. that, and I'm just tired and disgusted with the attitudes of some of these zealots. they're as crazy as some of these aryan skinheads. i can't ignore that. i can't ignore the hypocrisy that keeps being thrust at me.

and believe me, i do understand your points of view on some of these things. i have entertained some of the same thoughts, and probably much worse when push comes to shove. for instance, I'm not sure i could remain non-vigilante if some of the violent latino gangs were ever to make their way into my neck of the woods. but not on the basis on "nobody likes them". i suppose nobody likes the Kurds, either.

in any case, i will try to be a little less vehement.
 

Similar threads

Replies
31
Views
5K
Back
Top