News What Exactly Is Happening In the Arab/Persian World?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nismaratwork
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Protests in Egypt have escalated into violence, with reports of protesters being beaten and arrested, including journalists. The unrest is characterized as significant but not an outright uprising, contrasting with the recent events in Tunisia. Rumors suggest that President Mubarak's family may have fled the country, raising concerns about potential instability. As protests continue, there are fears that the situation could worsen, particularly with a planned massive demonstration. The emergence of a leaderless youth movement is seen as a critical factor in challenging Mubarak's long-standing regime.
  • #1,111
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,112
Proton Soup said:
apparently, whenever Clinton's lips are moving, she's lying. Davis is returning home after sharia law is used to pay blood money to his victims. all while Clinton is saying we didn't buy his return.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/16/cia-spy-murder-pakistan-blood

Well, we didn't, someone did. :rolleyes:

Well, do remember it's Clinton's job to lie... heck, she was talking about how we're poised to help the Libyans today... she's quite an accomplished storyteller.

Diplomacy:"Nothing but the skin of truth set up and stuffed." (H.W. Beecher)
 
  • #1,113
Have you heard about how Clinton was http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/03/young-leaders-of-egypts-revolt-snub-clinton-in-cairo.html?
 
  • #1,114
nismaratwork said:
Well, we didn't, someone did. :rolleyes:

Well, do remember it's Clinton's job to lie... heck, she was talking about how we're poised to help the Libyans today... she's quite an accomplished storyteller.

Diplomacy:"Nothing but the skin of truth set up and stuffed." (H.W. Beecher)

true. it would be fairer to say that you can't accept statements from the state dept as factual.

Char. Limit said:
Have you heard about how Clinton was http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/03/young-leaders-of-egypts-revolt-snub-clinton-in-cairo.html?

she's apparently still meeting with some groups there, but i can't blame them for making their point. i think at some point they would reconcile.
 
  • #1,115
Proton Soup said:
true. it would be fairer to say that you can't accept statements from the state dept as factual.



she's apparently still meeting with some groups there, but i can't blame them for making their point. i think at some point they would reconcile.

True... it's not Hillary as much as it's the job description. No wonder she wants out of politics after this term...


As for the latter, I didn't know until Char.Limit posted that... not surprised though. I think they will reconcile, because frankly, this relationship is too damned valuable.
 
  • #1,116
Proton Soup said:
apparently, whenever Clinton's lips are moving, she's lying. Davis is returning home after sharia law is used to pay blood money to his victims. all while Clinton is saying we didn't buy his return.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/16/cia-spy-murder-pakistan-blood

Well as far as the blood money(د یت) is concerned some of the religious scholars are saying that in this particular case the blood money could not have been used to pardon Raymond Davis.

About blanket immunity..., when the spokesmen of American foreign ministry was asked that why is the American government being so thankful to the relatives of the victims as Raymond had immunity and should have been released on that basis hence there would have been no need to ask for "forgiveness" in exchange of blood money..., the spokesmen could not give a satisfying answer despite the fact that the American government kept asserting that Raymond had blanket immunity and the conviction of Raymond only made it clear that he really did not had immunity i am not trying to start a debate here i am just saying that there is more to this case than just our governments and media is telling us some of our analysists are considering the release of Raymond as a result of some negotiations between ISI and CIA.

The Americans are denying that they had made payment of the blood money and so is our government i think that the relatives of the victims have not been given any money yet and their houses are locked some people are saying that they have received American passports and will probably be quietly moved to United States this matter might be over for the United States but it is not over for Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,117
Finally

Libya: UN resolution on no-fly zone

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12783819

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtqRtmRQY9E


EDIT:
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsvt.se%2F2.58360%2F1.2364887%2Futskriftsvanligt_format%3Fprinterfriendly%3Dtrue&act=url

French Government says a military operation against Libya could be within hours. While saying Kadaffis son Saif al-Islam to the country's army will not go into the rebel bracket Benghazi.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,118
*** LIBYA READY FOR CEASEFIRE ***

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/9034338/libya-ready-for-ceasefire-deputy-minister/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,119
DevilsAvocado said:
*** LIBYA READY FOR CEASEFIRE ***

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/9034338/libya-ready-for-ceasefire-deputy-minister/


WOW! when did this happened?? its a bit surprising because it looked the rebels we losing their momentum
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,120
DevilsAvocado said:
*** LIBYA READY FOR CEASEFIRE ***

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/9034338/libya-ready-for-ceasefire-deputy-minister/


Isn't it amazing how the "Libyan Strongman" responds to a real threat?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,121
WhoWee said:
Isn't it amazing how the "Libyan Strongman" responds to a real threat?

YUP! Besides being a Borderline BPD he’s a REAL COWARD! :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:
 
  • #1,122
FizixFreak said:
WOW!
when did this happened?? its a bit surprising because it looked the rebels we losing their momentum


Yeah I know... it probably only took Nicolas Sarkozy talking about "military operations"... :biggrin:
 
  • #1,123
This is could be an opportunity for Italy to take him by the hand and help him find a better way - timing is important.
 
  • #1,124
huuuum... I don’t think anyone in the west would even take in this man by tongs... maybe china...
 
  • #1,125
DevilsAvocado said:
huuuum... I don’t think anyone in the west would even take in this man by tongs... maybe china...

Let me re-phrase - this could be an opportunity for the Italians to put a leash on this dog and lead him around. Italy has a long relationship and uses a significant amount of their oil - they should step up or continue to trust chance?
 
  • #1,126
DevilsAvocado said:
*** LIBYA READY FOR CEASEFIRE ***

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/9034338/libya-ready-for-ceasefire-deputy-minister/


This is a surprise. Even accounting for the probability that several nations may have some preliminary plans in anticipation of a UN resolution implementing a no-fly zone, it's hard to believe an international operation could be operating and implementing the resolution overnight.

My initial reaction to the UN resolution is that it was too late to be meaningful.

I guess we'll see whether the cease fire by the Libyan government is real - especially if rebel forces take the almost natural step of using the opportunity to renew their efforts against the Libyan government.

I would have expected the UN resolution to serve as a clock for Gadahfi, meaning he had to pull out any stops he had left to pull (if any) in order to end the revolution before international forces actually started bombing his air defense systems.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,127
BobG said:
... I guess we'll see whether the cease fire by the Libyan government is real

I’m afraid the False Snake is lying again... it does not look good right now... :frown:
 
  • #1,128
WhoWee said:
Let me re-phrase - this could be an opportunity for the Italians to put a leash on this dog and lead him around. Italy has a long relationship and uses a significant amount of their oil - they should step up or continue to trust chance?

This is just my personal guessing: IF this man survives – he will face http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12636798" .

Not being lead around...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,129
DevilsAvocado said:
This is just my personal guessing: IF this man survives – he will face http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12636798" .

Not being lead around...

If he survives this - who is going to arrest him and put him on trial?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,130
WhoWee said:
If he survives this - who is going to arrest him and put him on trial?

They guys who will win this "battle" + UN personnel/forces.

Yesterday, it looked unsure where this was going. Today, there is no doubt – the man has lost. He has basically THE WHOLE WORLD against him.

Not even China or Russia are supporting him actively... there is NO way he will survive this in the long run... and when the men closest to him realizes this – he is finished.
 
  • #1,131
BBC: 'Western' air force heading for Libya.
 
  • #1,132
DevilsAvocado said:
They guys who will win this "battle" + UN personnel/forces.

Yesterday, it looked unsure where this was going. Today, there is no doubt – the man has lost. He has basically THE WHOLE WORLD against him.

Not even China or Russia are supporting him actively... there is NO way he will survive this in the long run... and when the men closest to him realizes this – he is finished.

Won't that require UN ground forces?
 
  • #1,133
DevilsAvocado said:
*** LIBYA READY FOR CEASEFIRE ***

http://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/-/world/9034338/libya-ready-for-ceasefire-deputy-minister/
/QUOTE]

They announced a cease-fire, but by all accounts it has not yet occured. It's a cagey move, because the first move is to attack AA and RADAR installations... do we start that even if there's nothing flying?

I think it sets a bad precedent to make this resolution and not follow through... appeasement has never worked AFAIK. We have the green light for 'All necessary means'... it's time to kill Ghaddafi and his sons, and remove his AA capability before he can organize and make good on that cease-fire.

@WhoWee: Yes, ground forces, but UN, not US, or NATO.

@FizixFreak: As I understand it, this has been primarily about Pakistan from the start, betweent he western and eastern provinces. It seems clear that the two killed were in fact, robbers, but I can't imagine that letting someone go without the judicial process sits well with your people. The combintion of some kind of blood money to the family and not being used as a wedge in an internal division seems like the best course.

Mind you, the best thing would have been if this american had died. Don't get me wrong, I think, he acted in self-defense, but the trouble he's caused for two nations could have been avoided had he simply been robbed, or killed. That's a minor incident, the central government could work the provinces to find a couple of robbers, which would be a binding force.

Instead, we have two dead men and a further divide in a country that MUST remain stable for its own sake.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,134
DevilsAvocado said:
YUP! Besides being a Borderline BPD he’s a REAL COWARD! :biggrin::biggrin::biggrin:

Don't get me wrong, Ghaddafi is an animal, less than an animal... his sons are monsters as well. They're not stupid however, and this isn't cowardice, it's the calculus of manipulation.
 
  • #1,135
WhoWee said:
Won't that require UN ground forces?

That wouldn’t be a problem once MG has lost, would it? The rebels are cheering the UN resolution...

IMHO, there is no way to predict exactly how this will develop, but that MG will finally lose.

This man is totally crazy. Yesterday he was "threatening" that the whole Mediterranean area will be "completely destroyed" if western forces intervene...

He might as well say (when he realize the he will be killed by the rebels if caught) – "I give up! Come and get me now please!"

We just don’t know... this man is not rational...
 
  • #1,136
DevilsAvocado said:
That wouldn’t be a problem once MG has lost, would it? The rebels are cheering the UN resolution...

IMHO, there is no way to predict exactly how this will develop, but that MG will finally lose.

This man is totally crazy. Yesterday he was "threatening" that the whole Mediterranean area will be "completely destroyed" if western forces intervene...

He might as well say (when he realize the he will be killed by the rebels if caught) – "I give up! Come and get me now please!"

We just don’t know... this man is not rational...

Yep, he's crazy with a capital "BLEEAAAAHHGGGH Hoot Hoot YAAA!" :wink:
 
  • #1,137
CNN: NATO air force along Libya north coast.
 
  • #1,138
DevilsAvocado said:
CNN: NATO air force along Libya north coast.

Well, you know the first step is to destroy AA capability... that's going to happen over the next few hours... nobody has come this far to allow Ghaddafii to declare a bogus ceasefire.

With the Arab League and UN on board, I can only hope that the move after establishing an NFZ/DMZ is to assassinate the Ghaddafis.
 
  • #1,139
They announced a cease-fire, but by all accounts it has not yet occured. It's a cagey move, because the first move is to attack AA and RADAR installations... do we start that even if there's nothing flying?

I think it sets a bad precedent to make this resolution and not follow through... appeasement has never worked AFAIK. We have the green light for 'All necessary means'... it's time to kill Ghaddafi and his sons, and remove his AA capability before he can organize and make good on that cease-fire.


After having the upper hand on the rebels it does seems fishy to some extent i agree with you it is to early to celebrate this guy is quite different from Mubarak he is pure evil even the international pressure and collapsing infrastructure couldn't phase him he bombed his own people like they are nothing what these tyrants don't understand is that if they take out their own people who the hell will be left to rule i think you and i both agree that this guy needs to die like a dog!


@FizixFreak: As I understand it, this has been primarily about Pakistan from the start, betweent he western and eastern provinces. It seems clear that the two killed were in fact, robbers, but I can't imagine that letting someone go without the judicial process sits well with your people. The combintion of some kind of blood money to the family and not being used as a wedge in an internal division seems like the best course.

All about Pakistan you are kidding right? "between the eastern and western provinces" nope it was between the Punjab and Provincial government to some extent though and let me tell you that when this incident actually happened the police tried to cover up Raymond they almost convinced the media and the entire nation that these guys were robbers but when the investigation was transferred to higher authorities they declared that those guys were innocent other wise what was the need of blood money and by the way the reason why one of the guys had a gun is because his brother was killed in an ongoing dispute with another party and he had a license for that as well.

Mind you, the best thing would have been if this american had died. Don't get me wrong, I think, he acted in self-defense, but the trouble he's caused for two nations could have been avoided had he simply been robbed, or killed. That's a minor incident, the central government could work the provinces to find a couple of robbers, which would be a binding force.

I never thought you were that harsh:rolleyes: but no doubt that it caused a lot of trouble for both nations and while its over for you but its far from over for us because this decision has been challenged in court
 
  • #1,140
FizixFreak said:
After having the upper hand on the rebels it does seems fishy to some extent i agree with you it is to early to celebrate this guy is quite different from Mubarak he is pure evil even the international pressure and collapsing infrastructure couldn't phase him he bombed his own people like they are nothing what these tyrants don't understand is that if they take out their own people who the hell will be left to rule i think you and i both agree that this guy needs to die like a dog!


Agreed... Mubarak was just... Mubarak. I think people forget that the Middle East admires a tough man as leader, but over time I think Mubarak believed too many of his own stories, you know? Still, he listened in the end... not a good man, but as you say, not a monster. I'd add, what the hell is happening in Bahrain!? They just wrecked the square where protests were being held... what a cruel action.


FizixFreak said:
All about Pakistan you are kidding right? "between the eastern and western provinces" nope it was between the Punjab and Provincial government to some extent though and let me tell you that when this incident actually happened the police tried to cover up Raymond they almost convinced the media and the entire nation that these guys were robbers but when the investigation was transferred to higher authorities they declared that those guys were innocent other wise what was the need of blood money and by the way the reason why one of the guys had a gun is because his brother was killed in an ongoing dispute with another party and he had a license for that as well.


Hmmm, it seems our respective media outlets are telling very different stories. Both are plausible, so I reserve judgment on the matter... all parties have reason to at least 'bend' the truth. The USA isn't new to it, but Pakistan isn't stupid (as you know)... I am surprised that they tried to cover it up. Countries shouldn't have to worry about ejecting someone with diplomatic immunity, it should be done with prejudice.

I think we'll never know exactly what happened, but for now at least maybe things can calm down a bit. Understand, the west generally sees Pakistan as potentially dangerous and divided, which is a rather limited view. The thing is, these events occur and confirm the very worst assumptions of Americans and Pakistanis; Americans are bullies and get away with things, and Pakistanis are just looking to nail an ex-soldier. Both are untrue of course, or at least, not MOST of the truth, but in both countries this does nothing except cause strife.

You have the USA and the central government quietly agreeing to drone strikes that the population as a whole is enraged about. On the USA side, people like me are torn... on one hand there are safe havens... on the other we kill a LOT of civilans... a lot. We're turning a country against us, and we're not recognizing how furious WE'D be if someone bombed saaay... California every so often, killing 10-30 civilians to get at a handful of 'bad guys'.

On the other hand, the USA is stretched thin due to our idiot invasion of Iraq, and actually trying to HOLD Afghanistan. I mean... Afghanistan... :smile: you'd think we'd learn at some point, right? Then, you have these unmanned aircraft that greatly appeal to a technologically saavy nation, and to commanders who only risk the lives of targets and civilians, not a pilot.

I don't think it's easy, but I think it's easIER than sending a sortie to bomb. I don't know how to reconcile this... I believe the only way to leave Afghanistan. If Al Qaeda gathers to train again, I suspect it's in Yemen and Somalia... Afghanis seem done with them. Given that... I don't know what on Earth we're doing there. We leave, and that means the current "Taliban" hiding in Eastern Pakistan cease to be targets. I just don't believe that any country or people can stand what we're doing, we're trying to fix our own mistakes in Afghanistan when we fought the Soviets by proxy, and in doing so we're creating more of the same in YOUR country.

If that's not madness, I don't know what it.

FizixFreak;3195761[SIZE="2" said:
I never thought you were that harsh:rolleyes: but no doubt that it caused a lot of trouble for both nations and while its over for you but its far from over for us because this decision has been challenged in court

I can be very harsh, but it brings me no joy... my harshness comes from outrage and sadness. If one man had to die, be robbed, or whatever the hell happened... well... he was a solider. It would save more than 'trouble', it would be part of salvaging our wrecked relationship with your nation.

We play India against you, and you against India, and arm you both. I'm harsh because we've made such a mess of things already, and in a hard part of the world, that I think harsh is the only solution. Not harsh for ONE people, harsh for everyone involved; a clean cut. We need to accept that the Middle East is not something we understand very well, or operate particularly well in.

Sorry... I know this is an emotional issue for you, more than for me. I just try to see all of the angles and outcomes, and if a dead American, or a dead Pakistani saves deteriorating relations... so be it. We could have revoked his immunity, but the American public and diplomatic community would be outraged, and it would allow unscrupulous elements to set up embassy and other personnel.

Remember, if a Pakistani with diplo immunity did this in the USA, we'd expel the guy unless Pakistan withdrew immunity. People like Gaddafi's son Hannibal have done terrible things abroad with that protection.

On the level of one person, one life... it's unfair, but without diplomacy we have only isolationism and war. Diplomatic immunity can be abused, but without it the world would be unlivable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
13K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K