Integration and sequences of functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a continuous function \( f \) on the interval \([0,1]\) must be zero if the integral of \( x^n f(x) \) equals zero for all even natural numbers \( n \). Participants explore the implications of this condition and the relationship between \( f \) and an even extension \( g \) of \( f \) over the interval \([-1,1]\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the Weierstrass Approximation Theorem and the implications of extending \( f \) to an even function \( g \). Questions arise about the relationship between integrals over different intervals and the treatment of constants in the function \( g \).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various approaches being explored. Some participants have suggested methods to analyze the integral of \( g^2 \) and its implications, while others are questioning the treatment of constants in the function. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive lines of reasoning are being developed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note differing definitions of natural numbers in their coursework, which affects the interpretation of even natural numbers. This has led to discussions about the implications of including zero in this set.

Hitman2-2

Homework Statement



Let f be a continuous function on [0,1]. Prove that if

[tex] <br /> \int_{0}^{1} x^n f(x) dx = 0<br /> [/tex]

for all even natural numbers n, then f(x) = 0 for all [tex]x \in [0,1][/tex].

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm pretty much stuck on this problem. All I know is that by the Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, there exists a sequence of polynomials Pn that converges uniformly to f, so

[tex] <br /> \lim_{n\rightarrow 0} \int_{0}^{1} P_n f(x) dx = \int_{0}^{1} f(x) \lim_{n\rightarrow 0} P_n dx <br /> = \int_{0}^{1} f^2(x) dx<br /> [/tex]

but that's about as far as I can get.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about if you extend f(x) to an even function g(x) on the interval [-1,1]? And while you are at it subtract a constant so the integral of g(x) over [-1,1] is zero. Now the integral of x^k times g(x) equals zero for all k greater than or equal zero.
 
What would be the relationship between

[tex] <br /> \int_{0}^{1} x^n f(x) dx<br /> [/tex]

and

[tex] <br /> \int_{-1}^{1} x^n g(x) dx<br /> [/tex]
 
Hitman2-2 said:
What would be the relationship between

[tex] <br /> \int_{0}^{1} x^n f(x) dx<br /> [/tex]

and

[tex] <br /> \int_{-1}^{1} x^n g(x) dx<br /> [/tex]

If n is even then the second one is twice the first one, right? Or zero. If n is odd then the second one vanishes because its the integral of an odd function.
 
Hmmmm. I've been trying to show integral of g^2 over [-1,1] is zero. But I can't figure out what to do with the 'constant part' of g(x). My suggestion earlier that you just 'subtract it off' doesn't work. Maybe there's an easier way. Any new ideas?
 
No, unfortunately. But I'll let you know if I figure anything out. Thanks again.
 
Hitman2-2 said:
No, unfortunately. But I'll let you know if I figure anything out. Thanks again.

Do that, thanks. This is annoying me.
 
Dick said:
Um, you wouldn't consider n=0 an even natural number, would you? See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=290229

For the course I'm currently in, I think so. We know 0 is an even number. In my class, {0,1,2,...} is taken to be the set of natural numbers (though other professors I've had take {1,2,3,...} to be the natural numbers).
 
  • #10
Ok, that fixes it. The 'constant part' of g(x) must be zero. Now can you show that the integral of g(x)^2 must be zero? Just as you first started to do with Weierstrass. Do you see how that proves g(x)=0, hence f(x)=0?
 
  • #11
Dick said:
Ok, that fixes it. The 'constant part' of g(x) must be zero. Now can you show that the integral of g(x)^2 must be zero? Just as you first started to do with Weierstrass. Do you see how that proves g(x)=0, hence f(x)=0?

Well, g(x) would be continuous on [-1,1] so we have a sequence of polynomials pn converging uniformly to g, hence

[tex] <br /> 0 = \int_{-1}^{1} g(x) \lim_{n\rightarrow 0} p_n dx <br /> = \int_{-1}^{1} g^2(x) dx<br /> [/tex]

right?
 
  • #12
Yes, if you have followed everything that went before. All the powers in p_n integrated against g are zero.
 
  • #13
all right, I think I see what's going on. Thanks again for all your assistance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K