Does Hamilton's principle follow from the Feynman formulation of QM?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether Hamilton's principle from classical mechanics can be derived from Feynman's path integral formulation in quantum mechanics. While there is a loose connection, the Feynman integral primarily yields the Green's function of the Schrödinger equation, which must be integrated with initial conditions to produce probability density. Participants note that Hamilton's principle focuses on trajectories, while the Feynman integral does not directly address this aspect. Some references are cited that attempt to bridge the concepts, but concerns are raised about the rigor of these derivations. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that a direct derivation of Hamilton's principle from the Feynman integral remains elusive.
Jano L.
Gold Member
Messages
1,330
Reaction score
75
Do you think Hamilton's principle from classical mechanics can be deduced from Feynman's path integral in quantum mechanics?

(We get across this question in another discussion:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=609087&page=5)

Of course, there is a loose connection, since main contribution to the Feynman integral is from the classical path.

The problem is, the Feynman integral in QM gives merely Green's function of Schr. equation; this needs to be integrated with the initial condition to produce probability density |\psi|^2.

However, Hamilton's principle says something about trajectory q(t). How to get this from the Feynman integral?

Jano
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jano

Thanks for starting another thread - much appreciated

You mentioned Ballentine didn't derive it in pages 116-123 I mentioned.

Actually he does on pages 120-121 in the section Classical Limit Of The Path Integral. However its the heuristic derivation I gave and not the more rigorous one using the method of steepest decent. That can be found in more detail (but still not in full detail) in the link I gave previously:
http://www.phys.vt.edu/~ersharpe/6455/ch1.pdf

Trouble is even the accounts that give more detail (at least the ones I have seen) use a dubious change of variable - really contour integration is required:
http://www.maths.manchester.ac.uk/~gajjar/MATH44011/notes/44011_note4.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Hmm, still I do not think the Hamilton principle is derived in the above pdf. It merely shows that the main contribution to the Green function comes from the classical trajectory. But in Hamilton's principle you do not have any Green function. You say something about the trajectory q(t).
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K