Find Exterior Derivative of Differential Forms in Dim > 3

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the exterior derivative of differential forms in dimensions greater than three, specifically focusing on n-1 forms and 2-forms in ℝ⁴. Participants explore the application of partial derivatives and the manipulation of differential forms, addressing challenges that arise in higher dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an n-1 form and questions how to apply partial derivatives correctly for each term in the exterior derivative.
  • Another participant suggests a method for rewriting the form to clarify the application of the exterior derivative, emphasizing the role of the wedge product.
  • There is a discussion about the complexity of calculating the exterior derivative in ℝ⁴ compared to ℝ³.
  • Participants examine specific examples, such as a 2-form in ℝ⁴, and detail the steps taken to compute the exterior derivative, including the distribution of differentials.
  • Concerns are raised about the ordering of differentials in the final expression, with one participant questioning the necessity of rearranging terms for clarity.
  • Another participant explains that the rearrangement of differentials is not required but is often done for aesthetic reasons, noting that an even number of exchanges does not change the sign.
  • A later post discusses the anti-symmetry of the multiplication of differentials and how it affects the final expression for the exterior derivative.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the steps involved in calculating the exterior derivative, but there are differing opinions on the necessity and implications of rearranging differentials. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the "correct" order of differentials and the aesthetic versus functional aspects of these arrangements.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the application of partial derivatives in higher dimensions and the implications of anti-symmetry in differential forms. There are also unresolved questions about the clarity and correctness of specific steps in the calculations presented.

saminator910
Messages
95
Reaction score
2
So say I have a n-1 form

\sum^{n}_{i=1}x^{2}_{i}dx_{1}...\widehat{dx_{i}}...dx_{n}

and I want to find the exterior derivative, how do I know where to put which partial derivative for each term,

would it simply be??

\sum^{n}_{i=1} \frac{∂x^{2}_{i}}{∂x_{i}}dx_{i}dx_{1}...\widehat{dx_{i}}...dx_{n}

hopefully this will clarify, for this 2-form

\alpha=x_{1}x_{2}dx_{2}dx_{4} + x_{3}x_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}

how would one go about finding the exterior derivative? I have no idea which partials to put where, this is simple for a normal ℝ3 2 form, but I have no idea here. let me know if I need to clarify.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi saminator910! :smile:

i'll rewrite your question slightly, since i find it a little confusing :redface:

how do i find the exterior derivative of an n-1 form \sum^{n}_{i=1}f_i(x_1,\cdots x_n)dx_{1}..\cdots\widehat{dx_{i}}\cdots dx_{n} ?​

i find it easier to write it as (\sum^{n}_{l=1}d_j)\wedge\sum^{n}_{i=1}f_i(x_1,...x_n)dx_{1}\wedge\cdots \widehat{dx_{i}}\cdots\wedge dx_{n}

then everything except j = i is zero, and you get

(\sum^{n}_{i=1}\partial f_i(x_1,...x_n)/\partial x_i)\ \ dx_{1}\wedge\cdots \wedge dx_{n} :wink:
saminator910 said:
hopefully this will clarify, for this 2-form

\alpha=x_{1}x_{2}dx_{2}dx_{4} + x_{3}x_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}

how would one go about finding the exterior derivative? I have no idea which partials to put where, this is simple for a normal ℝ3 2 form, but I have no idea here. let me know if I need to clarify.

if it's in ℝ3, where does x4 come from? :confused:
 


thanks a lot, this seems to make sense. That is actually in ℝ4, how would one solve that? I was saying it would be simple for a 2-form in ℝ3, but it's difficult in ℝ4.
 
ok, then eg d\wedge (x_1x_2\,dx_2\wedge dx_4)

= \partial (x_1x_2)/\partial x_1\ (dx_1\wedge dx_2\wedge dx_4)

+ \partial (x_1x_2)/\partial x_3\ (dx_3\wedge dx_2\wedge dx_4)

= x_2\ (dx_1\wedge dx_2\wedge dx_4) :smile:
 


Okay thanks a lot :biggrin:, that really makes things clearer. So for the 2 form in ℝ^{4}

I'm going through this step by step, just in case I make a mistake...

β=x_{1}x_{2}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{3}x_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}

dβ=d(x_{1}x_{2})dx_{3}dx_{4}+d(x_{3}x_{4})dx_{1}dx_{2}

dβ=(x_{2}dx_{1}+x_{1}dx_{2})dx_{3}dx_{4}+(x_{4}dx_{3}+x_{3}dx_{4})dx_{1}dx_{2}

now from here is where I think I'm doing something wrong, I "distribute" if you will, the dx's outside the parenthesis and get

dβ=x_{2}dx_{1}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{1}dx_{2}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{4}dx_{3}dx_{1}dx_{2}+x_{3}dx_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}

but the supposed answer is this, notice the switched dx's in the last two terms, why do I need to do this?

dβ=x_{2}dx_{1}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{1}dx_{2}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}dx_{3}+x_{3}dx_{1}dx_{2}dx_{4}
 
hi saminator910! :wink:
saminator910 said:
β=x_{1}x_{2}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{3}x_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}
…dβ=x_{2}dx_{1}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{1}dx_{2}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{4}dx_{3}dx_{1}dx_{2}+x_{3}dx_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}

that's right :smile:
but the supposed answer is this, notice the switched dx's in the last two terms, why do I need to do this?

dβ=x_{2}dx_{1}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{1}dx_{2}dx_{3}dx_{4}+x_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}dx_{3}+x_{3}dx_{1}dx_{2}dx_{4}

you don't need to do it, it's just neater

##dx_{3}\wedge dx_{1}\wedge dx_{2}## is the same as ##dx_{1}\wedge dx_{2}\wedge dx_{3}## (it's an even number of exchanges, so there's no minus-one factor)

but the latter looks better o:)
 


Thanks a lot!
 


saminator910 said:
hopefully this will clarify, for this 4-form

\alpha=x_{1}x_{2}dx_{2}dx_{4} + x_{3}x_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2}

how would one go about finding the exterior derivative? I have no idea which partials to put where, this is simple for a normal ℝ3 2 form, but I have no idea here. let me know if I need to clarify.
Its differential is d\alpha= d(x_{1}x_{2}dx_{2}dx_{4} + x_{3}x_{4}dx_{1}dx_{2})
= (x_2dx_1+ x_1dx_2)(dx_2dx_4)+ (x_4dx_3+ x_3dx_4)(dx_1dx_2)
= (x_2dx_1dx_2dx_4+ x_1dx_2dx_2dx_4)+ (x_4dx_3dx_1dx_2+ x_3dx_4dx_1dx_2)
Now use the fact that the multiplication is "anti-symmetric" (which immediately implies that dx_2dx_2= 0) to write that as
x_2dx_1dx_2dx_4+ x_4dx_1dx_2dx3+ x_3dx_1d_2d_3

The first term, x_2dx_1dx_2dx_4 already has the differentials in the "correct" order. The last two, x_4dx_3dx_1dx_2 and x_3dx_4dx_1dx_2, each require two transpositions, x_4dx_3dx_1dx_2 to -x_4d_1dx_3dx_2 to -(-x_4dx_1dx_2dx_3) and x_3dx_4dx_1dx_2 to -x_3dx_1dx_4dx_2 to -(-x_3dx_1dx_2dx_4) and so have no net change in sign.

(What is the "correct" order is, of course, purely conventional.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K