A question regarding General Stokes' Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter raopeng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Stokes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relationship defined by Stokes' Theorem in the context of Minkowski space R41. Specifically, it establishes that the integral of a vector field Xi over a 3-dimensional hypersurface is equal to the integral of its divergence over the volume V, expressed as ∂V XidSi = ∫V ∂Xi/∂xidV. The discussion also highlights the significance of the coefficient 1/6 in the integral, which arises from the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol and its relation to determinants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stokes' Theorem in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with Minkowski space and its properties
  • Knowledge of tensor calculus and Levi-Civita symbols
  • Experience with integration of differential forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Stokes' Theorem in higher-dimensional manifolds
  • Explore the properties of the Levi-Civita symbol in tensor calculus
  • Learn about the divergence theorem in the context of differential geometry
  • Investigate the implications of determinants in multi-dimensional integrals
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in differential geometry, particularly those working with vector fields in Minkowski space and applications of Stokes' Theorem.

raopeng
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let X^{i} be a vector field in Minkowski space R^{4}_{1}. We define the integral of this vector over a 3-dimensional hypersurface as the integral of the 3-form X^{i}dS_{i}. where
dS_{i}=\frac{1}{6}\sqrt{|g|}ε_{jkli} dx_{j}\lambda dx_{k}\lambda dx_{l}(don't know how to type exterior derivative)

Prove that:
\int_{∂V} X^{i}dS_{i} = \int_{V} \frac{\partial X^{i}}{\partial x^{i}}dV

From "Modern Geometry, Methods and Applications, Vol I", 26.5 Exercise 2

Homework Equations


Stokes' Equation

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought it was pretty simple so I just simply apply the Stokes' Equation which give me something like this:
\int_{V} \frac{\partial X^{i}}{\partial x^{i}}\frac{1}{6}\sqrt{|g|}ε_{jkli} ε_{ijkl} dx_{1}\lambda dx_{2}\lambda dx_{3}\lambda dx_{4}

while we can calculate the value of ε_{jkli} ε_{ijkl} by substituting indexes and considering its relation to the determinant of δ, the coefficient 1/6 is something I cannot get rid of. And it seems the more general form of this equation can be written as:
\int_{∂V} X^{i}dS_{i} = \int_{V} ∇_{i} X^{i}dV where the coefficient becomes \frac {1}{(n-1)!}. But now I cannot make connections with \frac {1}{(4-1)!}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got something, although not sure it is correct:
I made a mistake there that it should be ε_{imnh} ε_{ijkl}. The indexes should not be identical. Then taking advantage of the identity that ε_{abcd} ε_{efgh} = ε_{abcd} ε_{efgh}δ_{11}δ_{22}δ_{33}δ_{44} = ε_{abcd}δ_{1e}δ_{2f}δ_{3g}δ_{4h} which corresponds to a determinant. And in the case of ε_{imnh} ε_{ijkl} we must perform a contraction of the tensor, thereby leaving a (4-1) order determinant which has (4-1)! components of δ with different indexes. However these indexes are identical and can be switched, so this fill explains the coefficient of \frac{1}{6} and can also be extended to the case of n-form
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K