Draw Minkowski Diagram: x-axis 0-5m, ct-axis 0-5m

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on constructing a Minkowski space-time diagram with x-axis and ct-axis spanning from 0 to 5 meters, incorporating the Lorentz transformations for moving frames. Key formulas include x' = gamma(x - vt) and t' = gamma(t - (vx/c²), where gamma represents the Lorentz factor. Calibration of the x'- and ct'-axes is achieved using the invariant relation x² - (ct)² = 1, which describes a hyperbola on the Minkowski diagram. Participants emphasize the importance of using triangles of equal area related to the light cone for a simpler construction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski space-time diagrams
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of the Lorentz factor (gamma)
  • Basic concepts of hyperbolic geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Lorentz transformations in detail
  • Explore hyperbolic geometry and its relation to Minkowski diagrams
  • Learn about the Bondi k-calculus and its connection to light-cone coordinates
  • Review academic papers on Minkowski diagrams, such as those by Brill and Jacobson
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying relativity, as well as educators seeking to teach concepts related to space-time diagrams and Lorentz transformations.

Pixter
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
draw a minkowski space-time diagram for s and s' showing x- and ctaxis as well ass the x'- and ct'-axis. the x-axis and ct axis will span from 0-5m. everwhere x'-axis ct'=0 and likewise for ct'-axis x'=0. [(v=0.6c)(t=t'=0, x=x'=0)]

so any way I start out with drawing ct and x. like a normal x&y diagram.

Then i have the formulas x'=gamma(x-vt)
t'=gamma(t-(vx/c^2))

gamma= yeah you know. =)

oki so i can get ct' by using the formula tan(theta) = c/v

then i can get x' by taking 45(angle for c)-[(tan^-1(c/v))-45(angle for c)]
.

okey i done that. now i have to calibrate the x'- and ct'-axis by using the relations x^2 - (ct)^2 = 1..

now how do I do that? and did I do it correctly in the first part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you did part 1 correctly. Not too sure about how you calculated the angle for x', but it should be the same(from the x axis) as the angle for ct' (from the ct axis), and this one you got alright.

As for the calibration, you can do it using the lorentz transforms, which also work with intervals
\Delta x'=\gamma(\Delta x-v \Delta t)

But to calibrate the x' axis, find \Delta x' for \Delta t=0.

By a similar reasoning, you can find \Delta ct' for a ct interval of 1 in the stationary frame.

You can of course also use the invariant. \Delta x^2- \Delta ct^2=1 describes a hyperbola on the minkowski diagram, and this value is the same in all frames of reference, so you can just "read" off any axis.
 

Attachments

  • minkowski.jpg
    minkowski.jpg
    11.2 KB · Views: 590
Last edited:
Pixter said:
draw a minkowski space-time diagram for s and s' showing x- and ctaxis as well ass the x'- and ct'-axis. the x-axis and ct axis will span from 0-5m. everwhere x'-axis ct'=0 and likewise for ct'-axis x'=0. [(v=0.6c)(t=t'=0, x=x'=0)]
so any way I start out with drawing ct and x. like a normal x&y diagram.
Then i have the formulas x'=gamma(x-vt)
t'=gamma(t-(vx/c^2))
gamma= yeah you know. =)
oki so i can get ct' by using the formula tan(theta) = c/v
then i can get x' by taking 45(angle for c)-[(tan^-1(c/v))-45(angle for c)]
.
okey i done that. now i have to calibrate the x'- and ct'-axis by using the relations x^2 - (ct)^2 = 1..
now how do I do that? and did I do it correctly in the first part?
Great question... about calibrating the primed-axes. [What text are you using? If solutions are later given, I'd be curious to know how it was solved.]


As SN1987a said, you could use the Lorentz transformations explicitly or recognize that x^2 - (ct)^2 = 1 is a hyperbola.
There is a conceptually simpler construction using triangles of equal area with sides parallel to the light cone. (This has connections to the Bondi k-calculus and the Lorentz transformations in light-cone coordinates.)


See these references:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0407022 Brill and Jacobson
http://www.aip.de/~lie/GEOMETRIE/GeomZeit.html Liebscher
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0411069 Mermin
http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/~cew2/P209/P209_home.html Mermin notes
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0505134 mine
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
942
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K