Terminal velocity in finite time

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of terminal velocity, particularly in the context of a raindrop falling through a fluid. Participants are exploring the factors that influence the time it takes for an object to reach terminal velocity, as noted in a reference text.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the factors that contribute to a raindrop reaching terminal velocity in finite time, considering the role of drag force and the variable nature of the drag coefficient k.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their interpretations and questioning the assumptions made in the reference material. Some have suggested that fluctuations in the drag coefficient k may play a significant role in the dynamics of the falling raindrop.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of approximations related to air resistance and how they may affect the analysis of terminal velocity, indicating that the discussion is constrained by the assumptions made in the original problem context.

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
v^2 = \frac{mg}{k}(1 - e^{-2ky/m})

As t \rightarrow \infty and y \rightarrow \infty we see TV = \sqrt{mg/k}

And below my book reads: "From actual experience we know that a raindrop reaches its limiting velocity in a finite and not an infinite amount of time. This is because other factors also operate to slow the raindrop's velocity."

What are these factors? o:)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know what he would mean by this. The drag force is what's slowing down the raindrop, so friction can't be an answer. K depends on the geometry of the raindrop and the fluid. The K should change a small amount as the density of the fluid increases as the raindrop gets lower. But appart from that, I don't know. Maybe Clausius can tell us why.
 
Maybe the passage means that the fluctuations in the value of k as the object falls change the velocity more than the difference between v and vt
 
dav2008 said:
Maybe the passage means that the fluctuations in the value of k as the object falls change the velocity more than the difference between v and vt

I think you're right because before he states some approximations so that air resistance is R = kv.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
989
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K