Centroid ( center of mass ) of cardioid

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The centroid of a cardioid defined by the polar equation r = 1 + cos(θ) can be calculated using double integrals in polar coordinates. The x-bar coordinate is derived from the integral ∫₀²π ∫₀¹⁺cos(θ) r cos(θ) r dr dθ, which simplifies to ∫₀²π (1/3)(1 + cos(θ))³ cos(θ) dθ. The correct x-bar value is found to be 5/6 after dividing by the area of the cardioid, which is (3/2)π. The integration process can be simplified by expanding (1 + cos(θ))³ and recognizing that odd terms vanish over the interval from 0 to 2π.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their applications in calculus.
  • Familiarity with double integrals and area calculations in polar form.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and integration techniques.
  • Experience with mathematical software like Mathematica for complex integrations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to compute centroids of other polar-coordinate-defined shapes.
  • Study integration techniques for simplifying complex integrals, such as polynomial expansion.
  • Explore the use of trigonometric identities to simplify integrals in calculus.
  • Practice using Mathematica for solving polar integrals and compare results with manual calculations.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those preparing for exams involving polar coordinates and integration techniques, as well as educators looking for effective teaching strategies for centroid calculations.

jbusc
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
centroid ("center of mass") of cardioid

I'm having trouble calculating the centroid of the cardioid (and various other polar-coordinate-defined lamina), i.e., r = 1 +\cos \theta

I can see how it's symmetric over the x-axis, so y-bar is zero. So to calculate x-bar, then I do:

\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{1+\cos\theta}r \cos\theta rdrd\theta =
\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{1}{3} (1+\cos\theta)^3 \cos\theta d\theta

which seems to be particularly difficult to integrate, even Mathematica returns a nasty antiderivative involving things like sec ^6 theta which are obviously not necessary for solving the problem.

So, obviously I'm missing the main point here. I thought it would just be \int \int x dA but in polar coordinates... I followed the integral above and calculated it by hand but got a weird value, 3.75*pi, which cannot obviously be x-bar as is isn't even near the lamina. Plus, Mathematica got the much more complicated integral than I did, suggesting I made a mistake in the integration.

If I just made a minor mistake in integration and the above single integral for x-bar is correct...then I will try again.

Thanks for any help...

Edit: I reworked it and got (5/4)*Pi...which makes more sense...ahh I see now! you have to divide by the area, which gives you 5/6 which is the provided answer. Oh well :) Hope he doesn't ask such a question on the final... :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jbusc said:
\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{1+\cos\theta}r \cos\theta rdrd\theta =
\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{1}{3} (1+\cos\theta)^3 \cos\theta d\theta

which seems to be particularly difficult to integrate,

Not at all. I would expand the (1+\cos(\theta))^3 out and then distribute the remaining factor \cos(\theta). You wouldn't want to do that for arbitrarily large exponents, but what the heck this one is a mere '3'.

You then will have 4 terms that should be easy to integrate.
 
Tom Mattson said:
Not at all. I would expand the (1+\cos(\theta))^3 out and then distribute the remaining factor \cos(\theta). You wouldn't want to do that for arbitrarily large exponents, but what the heck this one is a mere '3'.

You then will have 4 terms that should be easy to integrate.

True, but this is for a final exam and it's one of many problems expected to solve in a short time span...so most problems don't involve much calculation (rather sort of "concept" oriented), in fact, many of the problems he asked on the final are ones that the direct solution is quite involved to calculate but you can use clever tricks to solve quickly.

I see how to do it now, it's just to expand it out and use some identities to solve it. I thought it was difficult because Mathematica did not do a good job integrating it... But the prof didn't ask any centroid problems so...I did well, hopefully :)
 
jbusc said:
so most problems don't involve much calculation (rather sort of "concept" oriented),

OK, here's a concept to shorten the calculation: The odd terms go to zero when integrated from 0 to 2pi. That cuts your integration in half. :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K