Closest approach of particle problem - Please help

[PhysicsinCalifornia]

Closest approach of particle problem - Please help!

Homework Statement

A proton (q = 1e, m = 1u) and an alpha particle (q = +2e, m = 4u) are fired directly toward each other from far away, each with a speed of 0.01c. What is their distance of closest approach, as measured between their centers?
e = 1.6 * 10^{-19}
c = 3 * 10^8
u = 1.661 * 10^{-27}

This should be a simple problem, but I wanted to know if anyone got the same answer as I did.

Homework Equations

Conservation of energy
K_i + U_i = K_f + U_f

Conservation of momentum
m_1v_{1i} + m_1v_{2i} = m_1v_{1f} + m_2v_{2f}

The Attempt at a Solution

After making my conclusion that the proton will eventually turn around and reach a 0 velocity because the bigger particle (alpha particle) will make this "collision" similar to an elastic one.

I first have to find my final velocity of the alpha particle, v1.
m_1v_{1i} + m_1v_{2i} = m_1v_{1f} + m_2v_{2f}
(4u)(3 * 10^6 \frac{m}{s}) - (1u)(3 * 10^6 \frac{m}{s}) = (4u)v_{1f}
9.0 * 10^6u\frac{m}{s} = (4u)v_{1f}
v_{1f} = 2.25 * 10^6\frac{m}{s}

Then I plugged that velocity into the energy

After plugging in and solving for my R (which is at minimum when the velocity of the proton is at 0), I get my R to be 2.24 * 10^{-14} m

Did anyone get this same answer? Thanks!

 

[Doc Al]

Hint: When the particles reach their distance of closest approach they will momentarily be moving together. What will their KE be at that moment?

 

[octahedron]

DocAl, how would you determine the velocity at that moment? I only found the final velocity with respect to the Alpha particle. My final answer is approximate to the OP's but I assume you see a flaw in that line of logic. Care to elaborate?

 

[Doc Al]

DocAl, how would you determine the velocity at that moment?

Using conservation of momentum.

I only found the final velocity with respect to the Alpha particle. My final answer is approximate to the OP's but I assume you see a flaw in that line of logic. Care to elaborate?

Not sure what you did. At the distance of closest approach, both particles move with the same speed. (The relative speed is zero.)

 

[octahedron]

Oh, so something like:

(4 \times u)(3 \times 10^{6}) - (1 \times u)(3 \times 10^{6}) = -(4 \times u)(v_f) + (1 \times u)(v_f)

In which case K_f = \frac{1}{2}(m_{p} + m_{\alpha})v_{f}^{2}

Am I in the ballpark?

 

[Doc Al]

You got it. But be careful with signs on the RHS of your momentum equation. Write it as: (m_1 + m_2)v_f.

 

[octahedron]

On that note, I assumed on the RHS that they'd go on the opposite directions hence the different signs. Or are they actually moving in one direction together?

 

[Doc Al]

Or are they actually moving in one direction together?

Think it through. If they were moving in opposite directions or had any kind of relative motion, they'd have to be approaching or separating--and thus not at the distance of closest approach.

 

[octahedron]

Very nice! But that, as you said before, happens momentarily. They do eventually separate, right? Or do they stay in this state indefinitely?

 

[Doc Al]

What do you think? Consider the force that two positive charges exert on each other.

 

[octahedron]

I'm actually thinking they'd be tailing each other for an indefinite amount of time (presuming, of course, no outside interference) by staying at the distance of closest approach. It makes sense to me this way since that is the maximum distance at which these two charges meet. But now I'm a little confused, because there does exist a repulsive force F_e of magnitude \frac{k_{e} \times 2e \times e}{r^2}.

 

[Doc Al]

The repulsive force is the key. At the distance of closest approach that force is maximum--the particles will separate. They essentially bounce off of each other.

 

[octahedron]

Ah, I think I get the gist of it now! Thanks for the insight. Out of curiosity, does there exist a setup where two charges continue tailing each other at a distance indefinitely? It's an interesting concept to know of.