What Happens to the Missing Energy in an Inelastic Collision?

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision, such as that observed in the ballistic pendulum experiment, some of the initial kinetic energy of the projectile is transformed into thermal energy and sound, resulting in a discrepancy between initial kinetic energy and final potential energy. This energy loss does not significantly affect the experiment's results because the conservation of momentum still holds true, allowing for accurate measurements of the system's behavior. Factors like air resistance and mechanical inefficiencies may also contribute to energy loss, but they are typically negligible in this context. The experiment demonstrates that while energy is not conserved in the form of kinetic energy, it is conserved overall in the system. Understanding these principles is crucial for interpreting the outcomes of inelastic collisions.
leykis101
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
i did a lab, the ballistic pendulum, and need help with one of the questions in the lab. here it is:
The initial kinetic energy of the projectile is (mv^2/2). The final potential energy of the system is (M+m)gh. However these two values are not equal in this experiment. Explain what happened to the missing energy and why it doesn't really affect the results.
m=the mass of the ball
M=the mass of the pendulum
any help? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think? Hint: What kind of collision does the projectile undergo?
 
if i had to take an educated guess i would have to say that energy is lost to heat when the ball is embedded into the pendulum. because of this the energy at the top is less than the energy at the bottom. I am not sure if this is correct though.
 
Completely correct! The ball and pendulum undergo an inelastic collision, which transforms some of the ball's original KE into thermal energy.

OK, so why doesn't this "loss" of energy affect your results?
 
leykis101 said:
if i had to take an educated guess i would have to say that energy is lost to heat when the ball is embedded into the pendulum. because of this the energy at the top is less than the energy at the bottom. I am not sure if this is correct though.
Indeed, that is correct. So that would make this collision an ######### collision. You could also perhaps mention air resistance, although it is most probably negligable. So why wouldn't this loss of energy affect your experiment?

Edit: The Doc strikes again...
 
the energy conservation formula refer in ideal
why you test many times?... because there are manythings in reality
such as force againts the wind or rusty of metal

Doc Al said:
Completely correct! The ball and pendulum undergo an inelastic collision, which transforms some of the ball's original KE into thermal energy.

OK, so why doesn't this "loss" of energy affect your results?

yes :!) maybe sound and heat
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top