Energy-momentum density of point particle

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
I'm using a following notation. (v^1,v^2,v^3) is the usual velocity vector, and

<br /> (u^0,u^1,u^2,u^3) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-|v|^2/c^2}}(c,v^1,v^2,v^3)<br />

is the four velocity.

So a energy-momentum tensor of dust is

<br /> T^{\mu\nu} = \rho_0 u^{\mu} u^{\nu} = \frac{\rho_0}{1-|v|^2/c^2}\left[\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> c^2 &amp; cv^1 &amp; cv^2 &amp; cv^3 \\<br /> cv^1 &amp; v^1 v^1 &amp; v^1 v^2 &amp; v^1 v^3 \\<br /> cv^2 &amp; v^2 v^1 &amp; v^2 v^2 &amp; v^2 v^3 \\<br /> cv^3 &amp; v^3 v^1 &amp; v^2 v^3 &amp; v^3 v^3 \\<br /> \end{array}\right]<br />

My first though was, that a energy-momentum tensor of a point particle would be this multiplied with a delta function, but after some struggling with the transformations of the delta function, I concluded that the result is, nontrivially

<br /> T^{\mu\nu} = m_0 \delta^3(x-x(t)) \sqrt{1-|v|^2/c^2} u^{\mu} u^{\nu}<br /> = \frac{m_0\delta^3(x-x(t))}{\sqrt{1-|v|^2/c^2}}\left[\begin{array}{cccc}<br /> c^2 &amp; cv^1 &amp; cv^2 &amp; cv^3 \\<br /> cv^1 &amp; v^1 v^1 &amp; v^1 v^2 &amp; v^1 v^3 \\<br /> cv^2 &amp; v^2 v^1 &amp; v^2 v^2 &amp; v^2 v^3 \\<br /> cv^3 &amp; v^3 v^1 &amp; v^2 v^3 &amp; v^3 v^3 \\<br /> \end{array}\right]<br />

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure whether or not there is a totally mathematically consistent formulation of the stress-energy tensor of a point particle or not. See for instance Stingray's comments (and more importantly his references) in the old thread

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=111148

If stingray is around, maybe he could comment in more detail.
 
This looks the same as what I got.

In that post, I initially used inertial motion along the x-axix, Y means \gamma and (x) means \otimes.
 
Last edited:
It seems there are some problems with point masses and metrics in general relativity, if I understood stingray's comments correctly. In special relativity that can probably be ignored.

My derivation went through the fact that

<br /> \delta^3(x-x(t))(c,v)^{\mu}<br />

is a four vector, like a four current of a point charge, and for example

<br /> \delta^3(x-x(t)) u^{\mu}<br />

is not. Good to see that George Jones got the same factors in a different way.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Back
Top