Understanding Diff Geom: Proving f(x) = 1 for x >= 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter noospace
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the function f(x) = 1 for x ≥ 1 in the context of differential geometry. The function is defined as f : ℝ → [0,1] with f(x) = (1/A)∫_{-∞}^{∞} a(t) a(1-t)dt, where a(x) = e^{-x^{-1}} for x > 0 and a(x) = 0 for x ≤ 0. The claim is that f(x) = 0 for x ≤ 0 and f(x) = 1 for x ≥ 1, with the challenge lying in demonstrating that the additional term vanishes for x > 1. The corrected definition of f(x) is f(x) = (1/A)∫_{-∞}^{x} a(t) a(1-t)dt.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of the properties of the function a(x) = e^{-x^{-1}}
  • Basic grasp of limits and continuity in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the function a(x) = e^{-x^{-1}} and its behavior as x approaches 0 and ∞
  • Learn about the concept of limits in the context of integrals
  • Explore the implications of normalization constants in probability density functions
  • Investigate the application of Lebesgue integration in proving convergence of integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying differential geometry, researchers in mathematical analysis, and educators looking to clarify concepts related to integral functions and their properties.

noospace
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
This is not a homework question, just trying to understand the material in my differential geomety lecture.

Consider the function

f : \mathbb{R} \to [0,1]

given by f(x) = \frac{1}{A}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} a(t) a(1-t)dt

where a(x) is zero for x less than or equal to 0 and a(x) = e^{-x^{-1}} for x > 0 and A = \int_{0}^{1}a(t)a(1-t)dt.

The claim is that f(x) = 0 for x less than or equal to 0 and f(x) = 1 for x greater than or equal to 1.

The first part is obvious. The second part I'm having trouble with.

f(x > 1) = \frac{1}{A}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} a(t) a(1-t)dt
f(x > 1) = \frac{1}{A}\left( \int_{-\infty}^0 + \int_{0}^{1} + \int_{1}^x \right) a(t) a(1-t)dt
f(x > 1) = 1 + \frac{1}{A} \int_{1}^x a(t) a(1-t)dt.

So the question becomes, why does the second term vanish? My lecturer claims this is obvious but I just don't see it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a typo in the way I've defined f(x). It should be

f(x) = \frac{1}{A}\int_{-\infty}^{x} a(t) a(1-t)dt.

Does anyone have any ideas about this?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K