Why do celestial bodies orbit in such precise speeds and patterns?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter billy_boy_999
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the precise speeds and patterns of celestial bodies' orbits, emphasizing that planetary orbits are a result of their formation from a single primitive mass of spinning material. It asserts that the near circularity of orbits is indicative of their creation in specific velocities relative to their distance from the sun or host planets. The conversation further explores the improbability of achieving the correct velocity for stable orbits, highlighting that most celestial objects have fallen into larger bodies, leaving only a few that maintain their orbits today.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and orbital mechanics
  • Familiarity with concepts of escape velocity and orbital velocity
  • Basic knowledge of planetary formation theories
  • Awareness of statistical probability in celestial events
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gravitational dynamics in celestial mechanics
  • Study the concept of escape velocity in relation to planetary bodies
  • Explore the theories of solar system formation and planetary migration
  • Investigate the statistical models of orbital stability and celestial probabilities
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, students of planetary science, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of celestial orbits and the formation of solar systems.

billy_boy_999
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
why do we get so many orbits in nature? how narrow is the speed between escape velocity and impact velocity so that the moon for example will 'fall into' the Earth whilst moving horizontally across it like 5mps or whatever? what are the odds that all these planets and moons have taken up this magic ratio of speed around the sun and around their host planets, etc.? why do stellar objects seem inclined towards orbit?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I believe that the near circularity of the planetary orbits is taken as a sign that the solar system was formed as a unit from a single primitive mass of spinning material. The planets were created in their current orbits, orbital velocity is determined by distance from the center of the orbit, so they have the correct velocity for that orbit because that is where they formed.
 
but that doesn't explain why! why were they formed in orbit? why wouldnt' gravitational attraction simply have sucked everything together at the time of planetary formation? and it doesn't explain all the other orbits of moons and satellites, why is it so easy for an artificial satellite to maintain an orbit if it is such a tight speed ratio?

i'm sorry if this stuff is too simple but i really would like to understand this better...
 
Consider doing the following experiment: flip a coin 10 times. If it comes up heads every time, write "Good" on a slip of paper, if it doesn't, write "Bad" on the paper. Repeat that 1000000 times. You should have about 1023 "Bad"s for each "Good" because the probability of 10 consecutive heads is 1/1024.


NOW throw away all the slips of paper on which you have written "Bad" and keep only the ones on which you have written "Good"! Tell a friend that these slips of paper represent the number of times you got 10 consecutive heads but don't tell him about the slips of paper you threw away!

The point is that that the huge majority of "objects" DID fall into the sun- that's one reason why it's so big! Take a look at the moon- all those craters represent debris that fell into the moon (and the "back side" is much worse- the Earth tends to shield the side we can see). What is in orbit now is precisely the very, very few pieces that happened to have precisely the correct velocity and distance to orbit. The overwhelming majority that did not are long gone.
 
you're right, thanks ivy (and integral, sorry)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K