How is work done by a gas in an irreversible process calculated?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of work done by a gas during irreversible processes, contrasting it with reversible processes. Participants explore theoretical aspects, mathematical formulations, and implications of thermodynamic principles related to work and entropy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that calculating work done in reversible processes is straightforward, while seeking clarification on the method for irreversible processes, specifically mentioning the integration of external pressure over volume change.
  • Another participant expresses a similar uncertainty regarding the calculation of work in irreversible processes.
  • It is proposed that the work done in both reversible and irreversible processes is fundamentally the same, suggesting that entropy does not affect the calculation of work.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of quasistatic processes, stating that if an irreversible process is quasistatic, the work done can be calculated using the integral of pressure and volume change.
  • The discussion includes a detailed explanation of the first law of thermodynamics and its application to both quasistatic and non-quasistatic processes, highlighting that the relationship between heat, work, and internal energy remains valid regardless of the process type.
  • It is argued that for non-quasistatic processes, the work done is generally less than the integral of pressure times volume change, with equality holding only in quasistatic cases.
  • Participants discuss the concept of internal friction and energy dissipation in irreversible processes, suggesting that part of the work done may be lost as heat, leading to an increase in entropy.
  • An extreme case of free expansion in a vacuum is presented to illustrate a scenario where no work is performed, raising questions about the definition of pressure in such contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between work done in reversible versus irreversible processes, with some asserting they are the same while others argue that the conditions of the process significantly affect the work calculation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in defining pressure during non-equilibrium processes and the challenges in applying standard thermodynamic equations in such cases. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the role of entropy in work calculations.

zarbanx
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
work done in an reversible process is easy to find we have the function of P internal bt when it comes to irreversible process then how do we find work done by the gas or on it and if ur answer is (sry i am new to forum i don't know how to use the features) [ integration p external dv] then please explain why is it so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the same question from me... :(
 
The work done by a reversible process and irreversible process are the same. Work done is just the work done, entropy isn't going to change that.
 
What matters is if the process is quasistatic or not. Quasistatic means that the process proceeds slow enough for internal thermodynamic equilibrium to be maintained.

If the irreversible process is quasistatic then the work done is given by the integral of P dV. Consider e.g. an ideal gas that is expanding slowly while kept at constant temperature. The gas will do an equal amount of work as the heat it absorbs.

Quasistatic irreversible processes can always be realized in a completely reversible way. E.g. in the above case where the entropy of the gas increases due to absorbing heat, the heat can be supplied to the gas by a heat bath and the temperature difference between the heat bath and the gas can be made arbitrarily small. The entropy increase of the heat bath plus the entropy increase of the heat bath is then zero. The entire process is then reversible.

In case of non-quasistatic processes you can no longer apply the usual thermodynamic equations. Work done is then no longer given by the integral of P dV. In general you cannot even define the pressure for non-equilibrium processes in unambiguous way. But even if the pressure is well defined and the integral of P dV is well defined, it is not the same as the work done.

To see why this is the case, consider the first law of thermodynamics:

dE = dQ - dW (1)

which expresses conservation of energy: The change in internal energy is the absorbed heat minus the work done. In case of a quasistatic change of the system, we know that:

dQ = T dS (2)

and

dW = P dV (3)


Inserting (2) and (3) in (1) gives:



dE = T dS - P dV (4)


which is known as the fundamental thermodynamic relation. Now, even though this was derived assuming the change in the system was quasistatic, it is also valid for non-quasistatic changes. The reason is that the internal energy E is a thermodynamic state variable which can be uniquely specified by the entropy and volume. Then, if you change the volume and entropy, the internal energy change is some fixed quantity, independent of that change is realized (quasistatic or not).

But for non-quasistatic changes we know that (2) is not valid. In general we have:

T dS >= dQ (5)

Then since (4) must be valid no matter what, we have:

P dV = T dS - dE

Using (1) we get:

P dV = T dS - dQ + dW


Eq. (5) then implies:

P dV >= dW (6)


So, the work done in irreversible processes will, in general, be less than the integral of P dV. You have equality in the quasistatic case, even if the process is irreversible (but such processes can always be realized in a reversible way).

In some books reversible volume pressure work is defined to be any process in which the equality (3) holds. This can be justified because if (3) holds and you plug that in Eq. (4) , then you obtain (using Eq.(1)) Eq (2), which can always be realized in a reversible way.


Loosely speaking you can say that P dV is the work done but part of it can get lost due to internal friction. That internal friction can be considered to be heat (it will certainly lead to entropy increase). But because we define heat as energy that flows to the system from outside the system boundary, it is not the accounted for by the term dQ in the equations.

So, what you have is that part of the P dV is dissipated in the form of heat which then casuses the entropy change to be more than dQ/T, while the work that the system performs is less than P dV, because work done is energy that flows out of the system in the form of work performed on an external system and the part of the P dV that has been dissipated is no longer available for this.

An exteme example is free expansion of a gas in avacuum. In that case no work at all is performed, but this process is so violent that you can object by saying that the pressure of the gas is not well defined. But we can perform a free expansion in small steps by moving a piston very fast from one position to a slighly different position, faster than the gas can expand and then fixing the piston in that position.

Then what happens is that the gas expands and bumps into the piston in that new position. The P dV term is then equal to the increase in kinetic energy of the gas which comes at the expense of the internal energy, but this kinetic energy gets dissipated after a while, so the internal energy stays the same.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philip Koeck

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K