Peskin Schröder Chapter 7.1 Field Strength Renormalization

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Chapter 7.1 of "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin and Schröder, specifically addressing the derivation of the two-point function and the manipulation of matrix elements. Participants seek clarification on the transition from the expression <\Omega | \Phi (x) | \lambda_p > to < \Omega | \Phi (0) | \lambda_p > e^{- ipx}, as well as the Fourier Transform leading to equation 7.9. The momentum operator's action on the vacuum state and its implications for Lorentz invariance are also discussed, emphasizing the role of momentum eigenstates in these derivations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts, particularly two-point functions.
  • Familiarity with matrix elements and spectral decomposition in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Fourier Transforms and their application in quantum field theory.
  • Basic understanding of Lorentz invariance and momentum eigenstates.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the two-point function in quantum field theory.
  • Study the implications of Lorentz invariance on vacuum states in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the spectral decomposition and its role in quantum field theory calculations.
  • Explore Fourier Transform techniques in the context of quantum field theory.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those studying quantum field theory and seeking to deepen their understanding of field strength renormalization and related mathematical techniques.

Phileas.Fogg
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I read chapter 7.1 of "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" by Peskin and Schröder and have two questions.

They derive the two point function for the interacting case.
On page 213 they manipulate the matrix element, after insertion of the complete set of eigenstates.

&lt;\Omega | \Phi (x) | \lambda_p &gt;
= &lt; \Omega | e^{iPx} \Phi (0) e^{- iPx} | \lambda_p &gt;
= &lt; \Omega | \Phi (0) | \lambda_p &gt; e^{- ipx} \end{array}

with E_p = p^0

1. Could anyone explain to me, how they get the third line above (also see P & S: equation (7.4) ) ?

2. Later on page 215 they make a Fourier Transform of the spectral decomposition. I don't know, how they derive equation 7.9

\int d^4 x e^{ipx} &lt; \Omega | T \Phi (x) \Phi(0) | \Omega&gt; = \frac{iZ}{p^2 - m^2 + i \epsilon} + \int_{~4m^2}^{\infty} \frac{d M^2}{2 \pi} \rho(M^2) \frac{i}{p^2 - M^2 + i \epsilon}

Regards,
Mr. Fogg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phileas.Fogg said:
Hello,
&lt;\Omega | \Phi (x) | \lambda_p &gt;
= &lt; \Omega | e^{iPx} \Phi (0) e^{- iPx} | \lambda_p &gt;
= &lt; \Omega | \Phi (0) | \lambda_p &gt; e^{- ipx} \end{array}

with E_p = p^0

1. Could anyone explain to me, how they get the third line above (also see P & S: equation (7.4) ) ?


The momentum operator acting to the left on the vacuum gives zero since the vacuum is assumed to be Lorentz invariant .

-JB
 
And where does the change e^{-iPx} \rightarrow e^{-ipx} come from?
 
Don't have the book with me, but my best guess would be that they set the state |\lambda_p\rangle to be a momentum eigenstate. This means the momentum operator P acts on this state and is replaced by the momentum eigenvalue p (which is ofcourse a 4-vector).

You can also check that when the operator e^P acts on the state the P is also replaced by the eigenvalue p turning it into e^p.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K