Confusion about Gravitational Potential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the two expressions for gravitational potential energy: U(h) = mgh and U = -GMm/r. The former applies to a uniform gravitational field with the zero potential at height h = 0, while the latter is relevant for the gravitational field of a spherical body, where the zero potential is defined at r = infinity. The conversation emphasizes that only changes in potential are physically meaningful, allowing for the addition of constants without affecting the physics. The approximation of mgh is valid for small distances when h is much less than r.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the equations U(h) = mgh and U = -GMm/r
  • Basic knowledge of spherical bodies and gravitational fields
  • Ability to perform binomial expansions for small values
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of gravitational potential energy equations in classical mechanics
  • Explore the implications of gravitational potential in astrophysics
  • Learn about the concept of gravitational fields and their applications
  • Investigate the use of Taylor and binomial expansions in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching gravitational concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of gravitational potential energy calculations.

dcl
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Heya's
Im a bit confused reguarding gravitational potential energy.
I've seen 2 different calculations

U(h) = mgh
where h is the height above the ground.

and
U = -GMm/r (off the top of my head, havnt got my notes here with me right now)

Could anyone help clear this up for me? Why does one expression have a negative potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dcl said:
Heya's
Im a bit confused reguarding gravitational potential energy.
I've seen 2 different calculations

U(h) = mgh
where h is the height above the ground.

and
U = -GMm/r (off the top of my head, havnt got my notes here with me right now)

Could anyone help clear this up for me? Why does one expression have a negative potential?
The former, U(h), applies to a uniform gravitational field where the zero of potential is at h = 0. The later, U = -GMm/r, applies to the gravitational field of a spherical body where the zero potential is at r = infinity. Plot each on a graph and you'll notice that each is a decreasing function of r, only the shape of the curve is different.

Keep in mind that only changes in potential are physically meaningful. You can always add a constant without changing the physics. The constant is usually chosen to make the math as simple as possible.

Pete
 
I see, makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
Just to add to what pmb_phy said, we use mgh much of the time in calculations because it is a good approximation to the change in the gravitational potential (given by U = -GMm/r) for small distances. i.e. when h << r.

Matt
 
r=R+h

So,

U =\frac {-GMm} {r} = \frac {-GMm} {R+h} = \frac {-GMm} {R} (1 + h/R)^{-1}

For h<<R, you can expand the last term binomially, and neglect terms of second order and up. So,

U = \frac {-GMm} {R} (1 - h/R) =\frac {-GMm} {R} + \frac {GMmh} {R^2}
= Constant + (m)*(\frac {GM} {R^2})*h = Constant + mgh

Since we are interested only in changes in potential, we can throw away the constant term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K