Confusion about Gravitational Potential

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of gravitational potential energy, specifically the differences between two expressions used to calculate it: U(h) = mgh and U = -GMm/r. Participants explore the contexts in which each formula is applicable and the implications of their respective zero points for potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that U(h) = mgh is applicable in a uniform gravitational field with the zero of potential at h = 0, while U = -GMm/r applies to the gravitational field of a spherical body with the zero potential at r = infinity.
  • Another participant emphasizes that only changes in potential are physically meaningful, suggesting that constants can be added without affecting the physics.
  • A later reply mentions that mgh is often used as an approximation for small distances when h is much less than r.
  • One participant provides a mathematical expansion showing how U = -GMm/(R+h) can be approximated to yield the mgh expression under certain conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the contexts in which each formula is used, but there is no explicit consensus on the implications of the negative potential in the second expression or the best approach to understanding gravitational potential energy.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the applicability of the formulas based on the conditions of the gravitational field and the specific scenarios being considered. There are also references to mathematical approximations that depend on the relationship between h and R.

dcl
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Heya's
Im a bit confused reguarding gravitational potential energy.
I've seen 2 different calculations

U(h) = mgh
where h is the height above the ground.

and
U = -GMm/r (off the top of my head, havnt got my notes here with me right now)

Could anyone help clear this up for me? Why does one expression have a negative potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dcl said:
Heya's
Im a bit confused reguarding gravitational potential energy.
I've seen 2 different calculations

U(h) = mgh
where h is the height above the ground.

and
U = -GMm/r (off the top of my head, havnt got my notes here with me right now)

Could anyone help clear this up for me? Why does one expression have a negative potential?
The former, U(h), applies to a uniform gravitational field where the zero of potential is at h = 0. The later, U = -GMm/r, applies to the gravitational field of a spherical body where the zero potential is at r = infinity. Plot each on a graph and you'll notice that each is a decreasing function of r, only the shape of the curve is different.

Keep in mind that only changes in potential are physically meaningful. You can always add a constant without changing the physics. The constant is usually chosen to make the math as simple as possible.

Pete
 
I see, makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
Just to add to what pmb_phy said, we use mgh much of the time in calculations because it is a good approximation to the change in the gravitational potential (given by U = -GMm/r) for small distances. i.e. when h << r.

Matt
 
r=R+h

So,

U =\frac {-GMm} {r} = \frac {-GMm} {R+h} = \frac {-GMm} {R} (1 + h/R)^{-1}

For h<<R, you can expand the last term binomially, and neglect terms of second order and up. So,

U = \frac {-GMm} {R} (1 - h/R) =\frac {-GMm} {R} + \frac {GMmh} {R^2}
= Constant + (m)*(\frac {GM} {R^2})*h = Constant + mgh

Since we are interested only in changes in potential, we can throw away the constant term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K