# How to relate the gravitational potential energy zero to the axes?

• peguerosdc
In summary, potential energy can be defined as either ##U = mgz## or ##U = -mgz##, depending on how the axes are defined. The important thing is to be consistent with the definitions of work, force, and distance. When the blue ball moves from Position 1 to Position 2, ##\Delta U## is negative, and when it moves from Position 2 to Position 1, ##\Delta U## is positive.
peguerosdc
(Throughout all my post, I will refer to “gravitational potential energy” just as “potential energy”)

Hi! I have this confusion about when is potential energy positive/negative and how it is related to how we define our axes. I think it is easier to understand my confusion with the following examples:

In case A, I have defined my axes to be as shown in the picture, with +z pointing up (x and y really don’t matter in my example). Suppose gravity points down (so it is in the direction of negative z) and that there is a particle (a blue ball) somewhere in the 3D plane.

As this is the most common set-up according to all the examples I have seen, I would define the potential energy as ##U = mgz## where the zero reference is where all the axes intersect. In this set-up, if particle is at position 1, the potential energy would be positive and if it as position 2, it would be negative.

My confusion is in case B, where I have defined my positive z axis pointing down keeping the zero reference at the intersection of the axes and the gravitational force pointing down (which in this case would be in the +z direction). In this case, should the potential energy be defined as ##U = mgz## or ##U = -mgz## ?

What I think:

If the object is above the zero reference, its potential energy must be positive and if it is below, it should be negative, independently of how the axes are defined.
So, based on this, I think the correct answer is ##U = - mgz## because:
• If the particle is above the reference (at position 1), “z” would be negative, which would make U positive, agreeing with my assumption.
• If the particle is below the reference (at position 2), “z” would be positive, which would make U negative, agreeing with my assumption.
Is my reasoning correct?

You have to couple it with the definitions of work. Force x distance. Which direction of force is positive? Which direction of movement is positive? If we do positive work, then presumable the result is a positive change in potential energy.

You can make the physics work with all sign conventions, as long as you are consistent.

peguerosdc said:
Summary: How does the sign of U change when I flip the direction of the axes?

(Throughout all my post, I will refer to “gravitational potential energy” just as “potential energy”)

Hi! I have this confusion about when is potential energy positive/negative and how it is related to how we define our axes. I think it is easier to understand my confusion with the following examples:

View attachment 248937
In case A, I have defined my axes to be as shown in the picture, with +z pointing up (x and y really don’t matter in my example). Suppose gravity points down (so it is in the direction of negative z) and that there is a particle (a blue ball) somewhere in the 3D plane.

As this is the most common set-up according to all the examples I have seen, I would define the potential energy as ##U = mgz## where the zero reference is where all the axes intersect. In this set-up, if particle is at position 1, the potential energy would be positive and if it as position 2, it would be negative.

My confusion is in case B, where I have defined my positive z axis pointing down keeping the zero reference at the intersection of the axes and the gravitational force pointing down (which in this case would be in the +z direction). In this case, should the potential energy be defined as ##U = mgz## or ##U = -mgz## ?

What I think:

If the object is above the zero reference, its potential energy must be positive and if it is below, it should be negative, independently of how the axes are defined.
So, based on this, I think the correct answer is ##U = - mgz## because:
• If the particle is above the reference (at position 1), “z” would be negative, which would make U positive, agreeing with my assumption.
• If the particle is below the reference (at position 2), “z” would be positive, which would make U negative, agreeing with my assumption.
Is my reasoning correct?
Yes, your reasoning is good for the case where "downward" is always in the same direction. That is a good assumption for objects that stay in a small area near the surface of the Earth, not so much for objects far from Earth's surface.

Note that ##\Delta U## is the physically meaningful quantity. So when the blue ball moves from Position 1 to Position 2 ##U## decreases, thus ##\Delta U## is negative. And when the blue ball moves from Position 2 to Position 1 ##U## increases, thus ##\Delta U## is positive. In all cases ##W=-\Delta U##, where ##W## is the work done by gravity. These statements are all true regardless of how you set up the coordinate system.

Thanks to everyone for your responses!

So, I worked case B again starting from the relation between the potential energy and the force and this is what I've got:

As the gravitational force is pointing downwards (on the +z direction):

## \vec F = mg \hat z ##

Then, taking the 0 as my reference, the potential energy must be:

## U = - \int \vec F \cdot d \vec l' = - \int_0^z m g dz' = -mgz ##

Now it looks more solid to me, but still want to check if it is correct.

## 1. What is gravitational potential energy zero?

Gravitational potential energy zero refers to the point at which an object has no potential energy due to its position in a gravitational field. This is often referred to as the reference point or the ground level.

## 2. How is gravitational potential energy zero related to the axes?

The axes in a gravitational potential energy system are used to determine the position of the object and its distance from the reference point. The reference point is often placed at the origin of the axes, and the potential energy at this point is considered to be zero.

## 3. Why is it important to relate gravitational potential energy zero to the axes?

Relating gravitational potential energy zero to the axes allows for a consistent and accurate measurement of potential energy. It also helps in understanding the potential energy of an object at different positions and how it changes as it moves in a gravitational field.

## 4. Can the gravitational potential energy zero be changed?

Yes, the gravitational potential energy zero can be changed by choosing a different reference point. However, the relative potential energy of an object at different positions will remain the same regardless of the reference point chosen.

## 5. How does the direction of the axes affect gravitational potential energy zero?

The direction of the axes does not affect the gravitational potential energy zero. As long as the reference point is clearly defined and the distance from it is measured consistently, the potential energy will remain the same regardless of the direction of the axes.

• Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
10
Views
1K
• Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
779
• Mechanics
Replies
27
Views
11K
• Mechanics
Replies
9
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
13
Views
1K
• Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
• Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
924
• Mechanics
Replies
11
Views
2K
• Mechanics
Replies
6
Views
1K