Coin Rolling on Table: Finding Angle of Axis Tilted Inward

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr confusion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Table
Mr confusion
Messages
72
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


if you start a coin rolling on a table with care , u can make it roll in a circle.The coin will lean inward with its axis tilted. The radius of the coin is b.The radius of the circle it follows on the table is R and its velocity is v.assume no slipping.find the angle that axis of coin makes with horizontal.
(source- klepner kolenkow 7.6)

Homework Equations


i think they are f(centripetal)=mv^2/R, F(friction)=mew N and torque balance



The Attempt at a Solution


mew mg = mv^2/R
and torque balance gives N R sin theta=F(fric)R cos theta
gives tan theta=mew=v^2/Rg
but the answer is given tan theta= 3v^2/2Rg !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr confusion said:

Homework Statement


if you start a coin rolling on a table with care , u can make it roll in a circle.The coin will lean inward with its axis tilted. The radius of the coin is b.The radius of the circle it follows on the table is R and its velocity is v.assume no slipping.find the angle that axis of coin makes with horizontal.
(source- klepner kolenkow 7.6)

Homework Equations


i think they are f(centripetal)=mv^2/R, F(friction)=mew N and torque balance

The Attempt at a Solution


mew mg = mv^2/R
and torque balance gives N R sin theta=F(fric)R cos theta
gives tan theta=mew=v^2/Rg
but the answer is given tan theta= 3v^2/2Rg !

Remember that \vec \tau = \frac{d}{dt}\vec L
Therefore, the net torque cannot be 0! Taking this into account, you should find a different angle. Find the angular momentum vector, and see how it changes in time. Assuming no slipping (No loss of energy), remember that the velocity (Both the linear velocity of the coin and its angular velocity associated with its spin about itself) remains constant in magnitude. This should help you see how the angular momentum vector changes with respect to time.

Plugging that into the torque equation should give you the result you're looking for.
 
thanks royalcat.i understood that a rotating vector is involved here and that is angular momentum. its vertical component remains unchanged but horizontal component is rotating at an angular velocity say W
so dL=(I (point of contact)* w) cos theta W dt ...(theta=required angle,w= angular vel of spin of coin about its own axis)
so dL/dt=3 mb^2/2 W w cos theta ...(parallel axis th used)
this is to be equated to torque about point of contact, right?
so, mg b sin theta= 3/2 mb^2Ww cos theta
tan theta=3/2 b Ww /g
for pure rolling v= bw=RW
SUBSTITUTING w and W, i get tan theta=3v^2/2Rg.
was i correct in following you in this? or is there a better method?
many thanks again.
 
That's a very nice way of solving it, my own was much more complicated! Though it could just be because I'm a bit more of a formalist. :)

Though it is correct mathematically, I think you might want to make a more robust case for your first line:

d\vec L = I\omega \cos{\theta} \cdot \Omega dt

I doubt you just pulled it out of nowhere, I'm just curious to see what reasoning you used for it. (Personally I used vectors and geometry to show that d\vec L = L_{spin}\cos{\theta}\cdot d\phi where d\phi is a small angle through which the spin angular momentum vector rotates in the plane of the precession.

And I then used the fact that \Omega=\frac{d\phi}{dt} and the chain rule to extract an expression for \frac{d\vec L}{dt}

How did you come up with your expression?
 
actually i came up with the formula the same way as u did. like ,say L vector is precessing in a plane so i can resolve the vector as L coswt i + L sin wt j
so dL= wL dt*(unit vector in tangential direction which is also the direction of torque )
and hence the result.
we can also use the triangle rule of vectors to compute dL.
Personally, i just pulled it from nowhere because we used it many times -in gyros, in precession of mag dipole moment about applied mag field inside an atom etc.:smile:
 
Haha, I wish I had your experience, that's a really beautiful argument! I can't wait to meet a question where it's applicable!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top