Coin rolling with constant deceleration, how much time to go 1.6m

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves a coin rolling without slipping, starting at an angular velocity of 3.4 rad/s and decelerating to 1.2 rad/s before falling off a table edge located 1.6m away. The radius of the coin is 0.011m. The correct approach to determine the time taken for the coin to roll involves calculating the angular displacement in radians, which is derived from the number of rotations. The final calculation shows that the time taken for the coin to roll is 10.07 seconds, after correcting the angular displacement from revolutions to radians.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular kinematics
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion for rotational dynamics
  • Knowledge of converting revolutions to radians
  • Basic proficiency in solving algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of angular acceleration in rotational motion
  • Learn how to convert between revolutions and radians
  • Explore the equations of motion for rolling objects
  • Practice problems involving constant angular deceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on rotational dynamics, as well as educators looking for examples of angular motion problems.

IAmPat
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A coin is rolled without slipping on a table top in a straight line. It starts rolling at 3.4 rad/s and slows down at a constant angular acceleration. It is rolling at 1.2 rad/s when it falls off the table edge. If the radius of the coin is 0.011m, and the edge of the table is 1.6m from where the coin started, for how much time did the coin roll?

Homework Equations



Wi = 3.4rad/s
Wf = 1.2rad/s
\DeltaX = 1.6m
radius = 0.011m

\theta = \frac{1}{2}(Wf + Wi)* t
Wf = Wi) + \alpha*t



The Attempt at a Solution




2*pi* r = 0.691
1.6m / 0.691 = 23.15 full rotations

23.15 = 1/2 (Wf + Wi)*t
23.15 = 1/2 (1.2 + 3.4)*t
...
t = 10.07sec

That didn't work. I assume it has something to do with calculating how many rotations, or the actual angle displacement.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it looks like you calculated your number of rotations right, but I noticed you plugged that directly into your equation. The value theta represents the radians that are displaced, not the number of revolutions. You first need to convert your revolutions to radians and then use that value for theta.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K