Finding the max angle of a longboard deck before the wheels slip

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum angle at which a longboard deck can be tilted before the wheels slip, particularly in the context of an electric longboard. Participants explore the relationship between the angle of the deck, the coefficient of friction, and the dynamics of turning, including the effects of speed and wheel geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines a method to calculate the maximum roll angle based on centrifugal force and friction, leading to a formula for θrMax.
  • Another participant questions whether the wheels are "crowned," suggesting that any wheel with width will experience slipping during a turn.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the implications of a coefficient of friction of 1, questioning why the maximum roll angle should theoretically be 90 degrees.
  • There is a discussion about the meaning of a coefficient of friction of 1, with one participant asserting that it implies infinite friction, while another disagrees.
  • A later reply suggests that measuring the board's acceleration directly might provide a more reliable approach than the initial calculations, considering factors like tilted roadways.
  • Participants discuss the potential for a dynamic coefficient of friction based on speed and vibration, indicating a need for further research and measurement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the coefficient of friction and the nature of wheel slippage during turns. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to calculate the maximum roll angle and the validity of the initial method proposed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the initial calculations, including assumptions about wheel geometry and the effects of road conditions. There is also uncertainty regarding the relationship between speed, friction, and the dynamics of turning.

CK_KoopaTroopa
Messages
8
Reaction score
2
Hi, I'm making an electric longboard and trying to write an app for my phone to function as the remote. I've got a bunch of fancy Star-Trek-esque indicators on it, one of which is the pitch and roll of the deck. All the indicators have "danger zones" and turn red when they hit them, and for this the danger zone will be dynamic as your speed changes so I'm trying to find the maximum angle (roll) in degrees that the board can be tilted to turn before the wheels slip on the road based on speed. I thought I had it down, but must have done something wrong because the results don't quite make sense so here's my process (sorry for the picture being so scatter-brained haha)

Finding roll danger level based on speed.jpg


So, the board turns in a circle whose radius r changes as some function of the roll, θr. More directly, the radius depends on the angle of the wheels with the midline of the deck, θw (see lower right section of picture for clarification). One can calculate this correlation based on the length between the trucks, lw by using SOH (sin = opposite/adjacent) to get
sinθw = lw / 2r ⇒ r = lw/2sinθw
To get θw as a function of θr, I figured out it's a sinusoidal relationship to the baseplate angle θb, specifically
θw = θbsinθr
Therefore, the radius of the curve is
r = lw / 2sin(θbsinθr).

Now, to get the centrifugal force, the formula is mv2 / r, so we can simply plug in what we got for r to get
Fcen = mv2 / (lw / 2sin(θbsinθr))
which can simplify to
Fcen = 2mv2sin(θbsinθr) / lw

The force that has to counteract that is the force of friction between the wheels and the road (with axis of movement parallel to wheel's axis of rotation), the maximum of which is Ffric = μmg. Therefore to figure out the maximum θr (the end goal of all this), we need to
solve Ffric = Fcen for θr

Oh boy, here we go.
μmg = 2mv2sin(θbsinθr) / lw
First of all, the m's cancel out, meaning it's apparently mass independent (makes sense; a heavier person will produce more centrifugal force but also push harder on the ground increasing friction), so now let's just algebra the crap outta this:
μglw = 2v2sin(θbsinθr)
μglw / 2v2 = sin(θbsinθr)
sin-1glw / 2v2) = θbsinθr
sin-1glw / 2v2) / θb = sinθr
sin-1(sin-1glw / 2v2) / θb) = θr
Therefore,
θrMax = sin-1(sin-1glw / 2v2) / θb)

This should be the end of the problem, but when I applied it to the program and plugged in appropriate values for all the variables, it wasn't behaving properly (for example, when the coefficient of friction is set to 1 the maximum roll should be 90 regardless of speed but it still changes as the speed changes). Any ideas on what I might've done wrong? Do I need to bring calculus into this somewhere as an optimization problem? I'm at a loss...
 

Attachments

  • Finding roll danger level based on speed.jpg
    Finding roll danger level based on speed.jpg
    57.4 KB · Views: 830
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Are the wheels "crowned?" Any cylinder/roller/wheel with a non-zero width is going to be slipping all the time in a turn.
 
Bystander said:
Are the wheels "crowned?" Any cylinder/roller/wheel with a non-zero width is going to be slipping all the time in a turn.
I don't think they're crowned if I understand that term correctly... I haven't actually purchased or built anything yet, I'm just getting the software down first and will put in values later. I realize that the wheels are slipping during a turn due to the geometry of how it works and therefore the curve itself can't be perfectly measured with this method, but I'm only trying to calculate the point at which it will cross from that required direct slippage into centrifugal force induced skidding. Maybe I am going about this entirely the wrong way though... Is there a better approach...?
 
CK_KoopaTroopa said:
when the coefficient of friction is set to 1 the maximum roll should be 90 regardless of speed
Why?
 
A.T. said:
Why?
Might be missing something here, but if the coefficient of friction is 1, doesn't that mean the surfaces have infinite friction between them (cannot move no matter how much force is applied)? And if that's the case, the maximum amount you could tilt the board to steer should be the maximum amount possible in its range of motion, which theoretically is 90°. In practice it would be less than that due to collisions, but mathematically speaking the maximum roll relative to exactly flat is exactly sideways.
 
CK_KoopaTroopa said:
Might be missing something here, but if the coefficient of friction is 1, doesn't that mean the surfaces have infinite friction between them (cannot move no matter how much force is applied)?
No.
 
Ok... Care to elaborate? What DOES a coefficient of 1 mean?
 
CK_KoopaTroopa said:
What DOES a coefficient of 1 mean?
Why don't you look at your own post:
CK_KoopaTroopa said:
... maximum of which is Ffric = μmg ...
What does μ = 1 imply?
 
Ohhhkay. I'm not sure what algorithm I was confusing with this but that makes more sense. Also, having thought about this for a couple days I'm realizing that it wouldn't work anyway, because it doesn't account for tilted roadways etc. Better to measure acceleration of the board directly which would be more reliable anyway since I can directly compare that with μmg.

As for the constant wheel slippage during a turn, maybe I could do some research and measurements and come up with a formula for a dynamic coefficient of friction for the wheels based on speed and maybe vibration, which would be more accurate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
23K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K