Differential equation conceptual question.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation with an initial value problem, specifically examining the behavior of the solution near a singularity at x = -1. Participants are questioning the validity of removing the absolute value from the logarithm in the context of the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore why the absolute value can be removed, with some suggesting that the initial condition y(0)=1 restricts the solution to a specific region. Others question whether the solution could encompass both regions by retaining the absolute value.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored regarding the implications of the singularity and the continuity of the solution. Some participants have offered insights into the nature of the differential equation and the conditions for unique solutions, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the implications of the initial value and the behavior of the solution across the singularity. Participants are also considering the continuity requirements for the differential equation and how these relate to the use of absolute values in the solution.

td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


see the picture
why the absolute sign of the logarithm can be removed? Although it is true for initial value, it is not true for x smaller than 1, right?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think the initial value can conclude that the x smaller than 1 is not defined?? But i still doubt this because the initial value cannot tell the whole solution.
 

Attachments

  • ODE.jpg
    ODE.jpg
    12.4 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry to be unclear, the above is the solution. While the original Q. is the initial value is y(0)=1 and the ODE is "y^(0.5)dx+(1+x)dy=0".
 
A solution will only be good on one side of the singularity at x=-1 or the other. The initial condition y(0)=1 tells you which region you care about. Since x=0 is in the x>-1 region, your solution is for x>-1. In this region, |x+1|=x+1, so you don't need to keep the absolute value.
 
vela said:
A solution will only be good on one side of the singularity at x=-1 or the other. The initial condition y(0)=1 tells you which region you care about. Since x=0 is in the x>-1 region, your solution is for x>-1. In this region, |x+1|=x+1, so you don't need to keep the absolute value.
But why can't the solution includes both region by using the absolute value sign? Is it not valid to use absolute value sign in the answer?
 
Because you can't cross the singularity. The differential equation expresses how y(x) behaves up to the singularity, but at x=-1, it breaks down. You don't have any information about what y(x) does in the region x<1.
 
Hi td21. Your DE can be written as :

[tex]y' = -\frac{\sqrt{y}}{1+x}[/tex]

Take a look at the "Picard existence theorem" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard–Lindelöf_theorem

Basically is says that in order for a DE of the form [itex]y' = f(x,y)[/itex] to have a unique solution you require that f(x,y) is continuous in "x" and Lipschitz continuous in "y".

BTW, Lipschitz continuous means continuous with bounded derivative.
 
uart said:
Hi td21. Your DE can be written as :

[tex]y' = -\frac{\sqrt{y}}{1+x}[/tex]

Take a look at the "Picard existence theorem" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picard–Lindelöf_theorem

Basically is says that in order for a DE of the form [itex]y' = f(x,y)[/itex] to have a unique solution you require that f(x,y) is continuous in "x" and Lipschitz continuous in "y".

BTW, Lipschitz continuous means continuous with bounded derivative.

So it means using absolute value is not allowed as it makes the solution not continuous!right? Thanks!
 
td21 said:
So it means using absolute value is not allowed as it makes the solution not continuous!right? Thanks!

Well kind of, but it would be better to think of it as the absolute value not being needed rather than not allowed.

What I'm saying is, yes the solution starting from those initial conditions can't be extended back to x<=0, but it's not only whether or not the solution expression can be evaluated (over reals) that determines where the solution is valid. Sometimes you have an expression for the solution that can still be evaluated beyond the discontinuity but the solution is invalid in that region just the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K