No-cloning theorem and time travel

stevenytc
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Does no-cloning theorem contradict with the possibility of time travelling?

If i send a photon back in time from t1 to t0, then between t0 an t1, I could have two identical photons, in other words, i can use the time machine to clone my photons.

Have I missed out something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stevenytc said:
Does no-cloning theorem contradict with the possibility of time travelling?

If i send a photon back in time from t1 to t0, then between t0 an t1, I could have two identical photons, in other words, i can use the time machine to clone my photons.

Have I missed out something?

Time machine? Really?
 
stevenytc said:
Does no-cloning theorem contradict with the possibility of time travelling?

If i send a photon back in time from t1 to t0, then between t0 an t1, I could have two identical photons, in other words, i can use the time machine to clone my photons.

Have I missed out something?
Your procedure violates unitary evolution. The no-cloning theorem assumes that evolution is unitary.
 
Demystifier,

Thanks for your response.

But could you elaborate on exactly how this operation violates the unitary assumption?

Thanks.
 
Unitary evolution involves an evolution from t0 to t1, but not an independent evolution from t1 to t0.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top