Depth of penetration of electromagnetic waves

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the penetration depth of electromagnetic waves, specifically comparing X-rays and visible light. X-rays penetrate deeper than visible light due to their interaction with matter, which is influenced by electron density and atomic resonances. While X-rays have higher energy, their absorption is significantly affected by the resonances of nitrogen and oxygen in the atmosphere, which absorb ultraviolet radiation effectively, thus limiting the penetration of X-rays. The relationship between frequency and penetration depth is complex and does not follow a straightforward pattern.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic radiation and its properties
  • Knowledge of atomic structure and electron density
  • Familiarity with atmospheric composition and its effects on radiation
  • Basic grasp of resonance phenomena in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of electromagnetic radiation absorption in different media
  • Study the effects of atmospheric composition on various wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation
  • Explore the concept of atomic resonances and their role in energy absorption
  • Investigate the implications of X-ray exposure and atmospheric protection mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, atmospheric scientists, and anyone interested in the interaction of electromagnetic waves with matter, particularly in the context of radiation safety and atmospheric studies.

nousername
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Hey everyone,

Im doing this research and reading this http://science.hq.nasa.gov/kids/imagers/ems/gamma.html" it had a diagram of the depth of penetration of different wavelengths into the eaths atmosphere...

my question is, How come x-rays penetrate deeper than visible light - what is the relationship between these two factors (frequency and depth of penetration into Earth's atmosphere)? Dont they have higher energy? So shouldn't they penetrate deeper? From examining the graph, i don't see any relationship between grequency of the wave and the depth of penetration. Could someone please explain to me the relationship between them?

Thankyou very much
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Xrays are more strongly absorbed than visible light.

There are two separate main mechanisms at work. For em radiation to be absorbed it must dump its energy into something in the medium it is traveling through. Firstly em radiation is absorbed largely in proportion to the electron density (number of electrons per cubic metre) – it distorts the electrons in the material, and if it has high enough energy tears them right out of the atoms. But also another is at work. If the atoms or molecules of the material have 'resonances' ie excited energy states, close to the energy of the em radiation then the radiation will be absorbed much more strongly than in the first mechanism. For example in air both nitrogen and oxygen have resonances in the ultraviolet and so very little ultraviolet gets through the atmosphere.
These energy are at all sorts of values so there is no simple formula representing this type of absorption. There is a (complicated) formula for the first process but it is the 'resonances' which dominate.

Hope this helps
 
nousername said:
Hey everyone,

snip...
my question is, How come x-rays penetrate deeper than visible light - what is the relationship between these two factors (frequency and depth of penetration into Earth's atmosphere)? Dont they have higher energy? So shouldn't they penetrate deeper? From examining the graph, i don't see any relationship between grequency of the wave and the depth of penetration. Could someone please explain to me the relationship between them?

Thankyou very much

They dont, if they did we would be all zapped by the Xrays. its the atmnosphere (particularly upper atmosphere) that protects us from the Xrays

Dave
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K