Mirrors and lenses under water

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenses Mirrors Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of using mirrors and lenses underwater, specifically whether their focal lengths change due to the medium's refractive index. Participants explore the implications of light behavior in water compared to air, considering both mirrors and lenses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if the focal length of mirrors and lenses changes when used underwater, suggesting that light rays travel slower in water and may converge differently.
  • Another participant asserts that the focal length of mirrors does not change, while for lenses, it does change due to the dependence on the refractive index of the media involved.
  • A clarification is made regarding mirrors, stating that "no" should apply only to front-coated mirrors, as back-coated mirrors may behave differently due to the light passing through glass before reflecting.
  • Another participant argues that even with back-coated mirrors, the focal length may not change if the glass thickness is uniform, noting that refraction effects cancel out on entry and exit, but there may be an offset affecting focus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the focal length of mirrors changes underwater, with some asserting it does not change while others provide conditions under which it might. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific effects on focal lengths.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the importance of the refractive indices of the materials involved and the uniformity of glass thickness, indicating that these factors may influence the outcomes discussed.

benw
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just have 2 questions.

If you use a mirror under water would the focal length change? And same question, but if you use a lens under water would the focal length change?

I was thinking, light rays travel slower in water, so then it difracts away from the normal more than if it was in air, which means the light rays converge at a different point?
 
Science news on Phys.org
benw said:
I just have 2 questions.

If you use a mirror under water would the focal length change? And same question, but if you use a lens under water would the focal length change?
No. Yes.

Lenses depend on refraction, which depends on the ratio of refractive indexes of the two media on either side of an interface. So for example, if you have a piece of plastic that has exactly the same refractive index as water, light would not bend at all when going through it under water. In fact, it would be invisible. Also, this is the reason your eyes cannot focus under water.
 
To be 100% exact, "No" should read: "no when using front coated mirrors".

In your every day life, mirrors have a reflective layer at the back of a piece of glass. Just to make sure the cleaning lady doesn't scratch it off. Using such a mirror would change the focal length, as the light travels through glass, reflects of the reflective layer and then passes through the glass again. Going from water to glass and vice versa will happen differently in air or in water.

Just for the nitty gritty sake of it.

Greetz,
Leo
 
Even with a back coated mirror, I don't think the focal length would change, assuming the mirror glass is a uniform thickness.

The refraction on the way into the glass is canceled out by the refraction on the way back out, so you end up with the angle between the incident and reflected beam being determined just by the the angle of incidence.

Although the reflection angle is unchanged by the refractive media, there is an offset between the point the ray strikes the mirror and the point it leaves from. This offset depends on the thickness of the mirror glass, and the difference in the refractive indices of the glass and the other medium. But I think this offset results in an aberation in the focus of the mirror, rather than a change in its focal length?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K