Geometry Elementary Geometry from an Advanced Standpoint by Moise

AI Thread Summary
"Elementary Geometry from an Advanced Standpoint" by Edwin Moise is noted for its rigorous and precise approach to geometry, aligning with the Birkhoff method, which assumes familiarity with real numbers. The author expresses that while the book has mathematical virtues and is well-written, it may lack pedagogical value for students seeking a deeper understanding of geometry. The discussion highlights a preference for Hartshorne's work, which utilizes Hilbert's approach, offering a broader perspective on Euclidean geometries beyond the constraints of real numbers. Despite personal reservations about its style, the book is acknowledged as a valuable resource for those interested in a rigorous derivation of elementary geometry from advanced concepts.

For those who have used this book

  • Strongly Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lightly Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lightly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    1
Physics news on Phys.org
I no longer have this book having unwisely given it away when I moved out of my office. However I only gave away books I did not enjoy or felt little further need for. So I am guessing this is a book based on the Birkhoff approach to geometry, presuming familiarity with real numbers first, not the way I think geometry should be done.

I also seem to remember that the book is oppressively rigorous, in a non pedagogical way, over concerned with the sort of rigid precision dear to a mathematician but not so much to a student hoping to learn to understand something. So I recall this as a precise highly expert account that somehow removed much of the beauty of my favorite subject. There are several rave reviews on amazon for this book though, and it certainly has mathematical virtues. I still recommend Hartshorne's book above all others, including this one.

But if you want to see how elementary geometry can be derived rigorously from more sophisticated notions, namely the real number system, then this may be for you. At least the title is accurate in that sense.

However, Hilbert's approach espoused by Hartshorne, is much more general and reveals infinitely more Euclidean geometries that are related to this one as the infinitely many other Euclidean fields are related to the special case of the real numbers. I.e. there is no good geometrical reason to prefer the real numbers for geometry. The field theoretic properties that are needed however are only made clear by taking a more geometric approach first.

Still I wish I had not given it away, since it is a rigorous and expert treatment, just not one I enjoy. I hope I am not greatly in error about this book, but there is way to search it on amazon. This is a fine book, well written with high mathematical standards, as is Rudin, but it's also not my style.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
14K
Back
Top