Science Fiction and Fantasy Forum Rules

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the rules governing the Science Fiction and Fantasy forum, specifically the limitations on discussing personal ideas and the rationale behind these restrictions. Participants explore the implications of these rules on discussions about the implementation and effects of fictional technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Meta-discussion
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the forum is strictly for discussing existing science fiction and fantasy works, not for personal ideas or speculative technologies.
  • One participant questions the limitation on discussing how fictional technologies could be implemented in the real world, arguing it could be a fun and engaging topic.
  • Another participant responds that such discussions often attract "crackpot" ideas and can devolve into unproductive conversations, emphasizing the forum's focus on actual science.
  • A later reply acknowledges the fun and illuminating nature of discussing fictional technologies but reiterates that the forum's purpose is to provide education and discussion of mainstream science.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the limitations on discussing fictional technologies, with some advocating for the inclusion of such discussions while others support the existing rules to maintain focus on established science.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects differing views on the balance between engaging with speculative ideas and adhering to the forum's educational objectives. There is no consensus on whether the limitations should be adjusted.

Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
5,963
Reaction score
727
This forum is ONLY for the discussion of existing science fiction and fantasy stories in movies, books, tv, comics. It is NOT for discussing personal ideas, those would go in the Science fiction WRITING forum if they adhere to the rules for that forum.

This forum is not for new ideas or projects, it is for discussion of existing fiction works ONLY. Any post not discussing existing works will be moved or deleted.

The global guidelines are still in effect. This applies in particular to the forbidden topic list: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3929007&postcount=2 Any obvious crackpottery and links to crackpot sites will be deleted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cybernetichero, EnumaElish and ComplexVar89
Physics news on Phys.org
I see that this topic is not locked and I don't see a "read-only" sign, so I'll just ask about one of the rules above:

Ryan_m_b said:
asking how such (fictional) technology could be built in the real world and what the ramifications would be is not (ok)

My question is: why? Discussing implementation and especially effects of SF technologies is one of the most fun topics tech-wise. So, why this limitation?
 
Corbeau said:
I see that this topic is not locked and I don't see a "read-only" sign, so I'll just ask about one of the rules above:
My question is: why? Discussing implementation and especially effects of SF technologies is one of the most fun topics tech-wise. So, why this limitation?
Because it ALWAYS attracts crackpots and devolves into nonsense. PF is about actual science and that is the rationale behind the rule. We don't break the crockery.
 
Corbeau said:
I see that this topic is not locked and I don't see a "read-only" sign, so I'll just ask about one of the rules above:

Thankyou for pointing out this oversight, the thread is now locked for replies. Before it is though I'll respond to your question:

Corbeau said:
My question is: why? Discussing implementation and especially effects of SF technologies is one of the most fun topics tech-wise. So, why this limitation?

As a big science fiction fan I understand that this is very fun to do, and sometimes quite illuminating. But the scope of this entire forum is to provide education and discussion of mainstream science, the general discussion forums (including this one) are a bonus. They have to fit within that former rule set and if we allow discussions on speculative (or even downright impossible) technologies then we are violating that rule. When creating the SF&F subforum we wanted to make a place that lovers of the genre can come and discuss it together, but it can only exist if it is not a loophole for the rest of the forum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KingGambit and kered rettop

Similar threads

Replies
63
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K