Science Fiction and Fantasy Forum Rules

AI Thread Summary
This forum is dedicated exclusively to discussions about existing science fiction and fantasy stories across various media, including movies, books, TV shows, and comics. It prohibits discussions of personal ideas or new projects, which should be directed to the Science Fiction Writing forum, provided they comply with that forum's rules. Posts that do not focus on existing works will be moved or deleted. The forum adheres to global guidelines, particularly regarding a list of forbidden topics, and any content deemed as crackpottery will be removed. Discussions about the real-world implementation of fictional technologies and their implications are discouraged due to their tendency to attract nonsensical debates, which detracts from the forum's focus on actual science. The intention is to maintain a space for meaningful discussions about mainstream science fiction while avoiding speculative or impossible technologies that could undermine the forum's educational purpose.
Ryan_m_b
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
5,963
Reaction score
726
This forum is ONLY for the discussion of existing science fiction and fantasy stories in movies, books, tv, comics. It is NOT for discussing personal ideas, those would go in the Science fiction WRITING forum if they adhere to the rules for that forum.

This forum is not for new ideas or projects, it is for discussion of existing fiction works ONLY. Any post not discussing existing works will be moved or deleted.

The global guidelines are still in effect. This applies in particular to the forbidden topic list: https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3929007&postcount=2 Any obvious crackpottery and links to crackpot sites will be deleted.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes cybernetichero, EnumaElish and ComplexVar89
Physics news on Phys.org
I see that this topic is not locked and I don't see a "read-only" sign, so I'll just ask about one of the rules above:

Ryan_m_b said:
asking how such (fictional) technology could be built in the real world and what the ramifications would be is not (ok)

My question is: why? Discussing implementation and especially effects of SF technologies is one of the most fun topics tech-wise. So, why this limitation?
 
Corbeau said:
I see that this topic is not locked and I don't see a "read-only" sign, so I'll just ask about one of the rules above:
My question is: why? Discussing implementation and especially effects of SF technologies is one of the most fun topics tech-wise. So, why this limitation?
Because it ALWAYS attracts crackpots and devolves into nonsense. PF is about actual science and that is the rationale behind the rule. We don't break the crockery.
 
Corbeau said:
I see that this topic is not locked and I don't see a "read-only" sign, so I'll just ask about one of the rules above:

Thankyou for pointing out this oversight, the thread is now locked for replies. Before it is though I'll respond to your question:

Corbeau said:
My question is: why? Discussing implementation and especially effects of SF technologies is one of the most fun topics tech-wise. So, why this limitation?

As a big science fiction fan I understand that this is very fun to do, and sometimes quite illuminating. But the scope of this entire forum is to provide education and discussion of mainstream science, the general discussion forums (including this one) are a bonus. They have to fit within that former rule set and if we allow discussions on speculative (or even downright impossible) technologies then we are violating that rule. When creating the SF&F subforum we wanted to make a place that lovers of the genre can come and discuss it together, but it can only exist if it is not a loophole for the rest of the forum.
 
  • Like
Likes KingGambit and kered rettop
I wonder how much stories were written, that involve space fighters, and arent so soft as Star wars. I dont think missiles totally make fighter craft obsolate, for example the former cant escort shuttles if one wants to capture a celestial body. I dont insist fighters have to be manned (i enjoyed Enders game about someone control the events for afar) but i also think it isnt totally unjustifiable.
I thought I had discovered a giant plot hole in Avatar universe, but apparently it's based on a faulty notion. So, the anti-gravity effect that lifts whole mountains into the sky is unrelated to the unobtanium deposits? Apparently the value of unobtanium is in its property as a room temperature superconductor, which enables their superluminal drive technology. Unobtanium is found in large deposits underground, which is why they want to mine the ground. OK. So, these mountains - which...
So far I've been enjoying the show but I am curious to hear from those a little more knowledgeable of the Dune universe as my knowledge is only of the first Dune book, The 1984 movie, The Sy-fy channel Dune and Children of Dune mini series and the most recent two movies. How much material is it pulling from the Dune books (both the original Frank Herbert and the Brian Herbert books)? If so, what books could fill in some knowledge gaps?
Back
Top