Why transition metals can have unpaired electrons in their compounds?

sludger13
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Why can have transition metals unpaired electrons in their compounds? In correlates to their multiple oxidation states, but I still don't know the explanation of it, that would make me satisfied - I suppose it's mathematical, as molecular orbitals are creating. Or is there any explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In most simple compounds electrons occur paired in bonds, lone pairs, and core orbitals. However, the degree to which forming bonds lowers the molecules energy (in comparison to every atom just keeping its own electrons in a high-spin configuration and not forming bonds) is related to the degree to which the atomic valence orbitals overlap, from which the bonds would be formed.

The main reason why many transition metal compounds can keep unpaired electrons is that overlap of their d electrons to their ligands' s- and p-orbitals is not large enough to make forming actual covalent bonds energetically favorable over both the ligands and the metal just keeping their own electrons, rather than sharing them.
 
Thank you for your answer!
It's clear molecular orbital would have higher potential energy than atomic orbitals.
The main reason why many transition metal compounds can keep unpaired electrons is that overlap of their d electrons to their ligands' s- and p-orbitals is not large enough to make forming actual covalent bonds
I can't see why some of (d) electrons can have sufficient overlap and others can not, though all of them are (circa) equally far from a nucleus and have the same energy level. Is it due to electron repulsion? Can anybody explain me?
E.G. Iron (III) oxide has one unpaired (d) electron, right? Which orbital is that? What impede it to create -lower energy- bonding orbital?
 
Can anyone just refer to some sources, please.
 
d-orbitals don't point all in the same direction, so you can't expect all bonding overlaps to be equally strong. Fe2O3 is a high spin complex, meaning that all 5 d-electrons are unpaired.
See, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligand_field_theory
 
Everything is explained here sufficiently but if you want a source, I reccomend Bowser's Inorganic Chem.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top