Beta Decay Questions: Help Understanding Angular Momentum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the intricacies of beta decay, particularly the selection rules related to angular momentum conservation and parity. The key equations presented include the conservation of angular momentum: J_P = J_D + L_β + S_β and the parity condition: π_P = π_D (-1)^{L_β}. The conversation highlights the classification of transitions as Fermi or Gamow-Teller based on the total angular momentum change ΔJ, with specific conditions for allowed transitions. The user seeks clarification on the classification of transitions, especially regarding the 1+ to 1+ transition and the implications of angular momentum changes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beta decay processes
  • Familiarity with angular momentum in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Fermi and Gamow-Teller transitions
  • Basic grasp of parity in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Wigner-Eckart theorem and its application in particle transitions
  • Research the classification of beta decay transitions in detail
  • Examine the implications of angular momentum conservation in nuclear reactions
  • Review literature on selection rules for allowed and forbidden transitions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in nuclear physics, particularly those studying beta decay and angular momentum conservation, as well as researchers interested in the theoretical underpinnings of particle transitions.

Starbug
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm having a hard time understanding some aspects of beta decay and I wondered if someone could help. (Perhaps this post belongs in the homework forum, but i don't have a specific question to do as such.) I'm not being helped by the fact that my general understanding of angular momentum is so poor, but anyway, as I understand it the selection rules for beta decay are

conservation of angular momentum:

<br /> \vec{J}_P = \vec{J}_D + \vec{L}_\beta + \vec{S}_\beta <br />

and parity

<br /> \pi_P = \pi_{D} (-1)^{L_\beta} <br />

Where L_\beta is the orbital angular momentum carried away by the lepton system. The transistion probability decreases rapidly with increasing L, and measurements of the comparitive half-life will allow us to classify a transition as (super-)allowed, first forbidden etc depending on L=0,1,... with log of the comparitive half life scaling about 4 units with each change in L.

S_\beta is the spin of the lepton system which must couple to 0 or 1. (Something I'm not quite sure about). Anyway if S=0 the transition is classified as Fermi, if S=1 is called Gamow-Teller.

What I'm struggling with is the quoted allowed values for the total angular momentum change. For an allowed Fermi transition the \Delta J is zero, and the 0+ to 0+ transition is called superallowed. For the allowed Gamow-Teller my book says that \Delta J can be zero or one, yet 0+ to 0+ can't be Gamow-Teller. I don't understand why the change can be zero, or for a zero change why it can't be Gamow-Teller if the initial or final state is 0. If I was asked to classify a 1+ to 1+ transition as Fermi or Gamow how would I do it?

Similarly for the first forbidden, Fermi transitions can be zero or one, but only one if it's from or to a zero state. Gamow transitions can be 0,1,2 but with a couple of disallowed possibilities, like 0- to 0+, 1/2+ to 1/2-, 1+ to 0-. I'm sure I've just missed something obvious but I can't make much sense of this at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does your book "invent" (give without any jusitification) those seletion rules,or it computes them using Wigner-Eckart's theorem...?In the latter case,i think there's not too much for debating.

Daniel.
 
It's very much an introductory course I'm doing so much of the rigorous maths was skated over, although some arguments were made for the reasonableness of the selection rules. The set of rules for total angular momentum change for allowed, first forbidden etc, though were just quoted, I got the impression they followed straightforwardly but can't really see it.
 
Here's the article (i don't have access into Prola,maybe u have).

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v59/i11/p908_1

And another one (maybe u have access into this one,too)

http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0370-1298/65/10/303

and more here http://hepwww.ph.qmul.ac.uk/~rizvi/npa/week04.htm

Daniel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you, that was most helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K