Material for flywheel and carbon fibres

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) is established as a superior material for flywheels due to its high strength-to-density ratio, being four times stronger than steel while weighing only a quarter as much. Safety considerations indicate that CFRP flywheels are safer than those made from traditional materials, as they tend to break into small pieces rather than large shrapnel, reducing the risk of catastrophic failure. The manufacturing process for CFRP flywheels remains complex, primarily due to challenges in achieving consistent quality and structural integrity. Toughness, defined as the ability to resist fracture, is a critical property in evaluating materials like titanium alloys and composites for flywheel applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of composite materials, specifically carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP)
  • Knowledge of fracture mechanics (FM) and toughness measurement
  • Familiarity with flywheel energy storage systems and their operational principles
  • Basic concepts of material science, particularly regarding titanium alloys like Ti-6Al-4V
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the manufacturing techniques for CFRP flywheels to understand the complexities involved
  • Explore the properties and applications of titanium alloys, focusing on Ti-6Al-4V
  • Investigate safety measures and containment strategies for high-speed flywheel systems
  • Learn about the latest advancements in composite material design and their implications for energy storage
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, material scientists, and professionals involved in energy storage solutions, particularly those focused on flywheel technology and composite materials.

hanson
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
hi all!
Are composites like carbon fibres (CFRP) the best material for flywheel?
There is no doubt on its high strength to density ratio.
Regarding the safety consideration, is flywheel made of composites safer than that made of other materials? I've read through some articles claiming that it should be safer in the sense that composite materials would break into many small pieces once broken. Is this a well-proven fact?
Also, regarding the manufacturing of flywheel using composites, is it sill difficult? Where are the difficulties?
All in all, what material would you consider to be the best material for flywheel?

By the way, can anyone tell me what "toughness" actually means? Is titanium alloy tough? are composites tough?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I can't answer all the questions as I am not familiar with flywheel design, but certainly getting the maximum strength-to-density ratio is the way to go.

As for toughness, toughness is the ability to resist fracture. Fracture mechanics (FM) uses stress intensity as a property to quantify toughness. Much of FM is based on the maximum size flaw that can exist in an object without further propagation.

Here is a good source for use of carbon composites in fly-wheels:

http://www.utexas.edu/research/cem/archive_J_A_S_04.html

This paper might be of interest regarding NDT of CFRC's - http://space-power.grc.nasa.gov/ppo/projects/flywheel/papers/SPIE_4336-03.pdf

Flywheels are
made from exotic stuff, like composites of epoxy resin and carbon fibre. A carbon composite is four times stronger than steel, but only one quarter the weight. Jack Bitterly, and his team at U.S. Flywheel Systems, have come up with a flywheel roughly the size of a small bicycle wheel - but it can spin at 55,000 revolutions per minute (rpm), so it can store heaps of energy.
- http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/moments/gmis9733.htm

There are quite a few articles on U.S. Flywheel Systems, but I can't seem to find a website. Perhaps another company bought them or they changed their name.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronuc said:
I can't answer all the questions as I am not familiar with flywheel design, but certainly getting the maximum strength-to-density ratio is the way to go.

As for toughness, toughness is the ability to resist fracture. Fracture mechanics (FM) uses stress intensity as a property to quantify toughness. Much of FM is based on the maximum size flaw that can exist in an object without further propagation.

Thanks for replying!
So are composites tough materials? alo, titanium alloys, are they tough?
 
I believe carbon composites are reasonably tough, but I can't give you a number at the moment.

As for Ti-alloys:

Here's a little background on Ti-6Al-4V, one of the most common Ti-alloys -
http://www.azom.com/details.asp?ArticleID=1547 - but there are no fracture toughness numbers.

A check of the Ti section of ASM's Metals Handbook indicates that Ti-6Al-4V has the greatest fracture toughness of a set of common Ti-alloys. With an alpha-beta forged treatment fracture toughness of Ti-6Al-4V is about 46 ksi\sqrt{in} (50 MPa\sqrt{m}) and in the beta forged state has a toughness of about 60 ksi\sqrt{in} (66 MPa\sqrt{m}). The trade off is that is has slightly lower YS, about 145 ksi (1000 MPa).

You might find this site of interest - a course on composite material design - http://www.mse.mtu.edu/~drjohn/my4150/
Unfortunately - no numbers on toughness.
 
What are the drawbacks of using composites for flywheel?
I don't really know how to manufacture a flywheel. Is the manufacturing of flywheel using composite difficult?
 
"When the tensile strength of a flywheel is exceeded the flywheel will shatter, releasing all of its stored energy at once; this is commonly referred to as "flywheel explosion" since wheel fragments can reach kinetic energy comparable to that of a cannon shell. Consequently, traditional flywheel systems require strong containment vessels as a safety precaution, which increases the total mass of the device. Fortunately, composite materials tend to disintegrate quickly once broken, and so instead of large chunks of high-velocity shrapnel one simply gets a containment vessel filled with red-hot sand (still, many customers of modern flywheel power storage systems prefer to have them embedded in the ground to halt any material that might escape the containment vessel). Gulia's tape flywheels did not require a heavy container and reportedly could be rewound and reused after a tape fracture."

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flywheel_energy_storage

Is it true and why?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K