Can someone check my work - Problem involving pulley

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving two blocks connected by a pulley system, focusing on the conservation of energy to find the speed of block A when the vertical separation is h. The original attempt incorrectly assumed all potential energy was converted to kinetic energy without considering the relative heights of the blocks. Participants emphasized the importance of defining a zero potential energy level and correctly accounting for the movement of both blocks, noting that as one block descends, the other ascends by a different amount. It was suggested to use a different variable for initial height to avoid confusion with the final separation. Ultimately, clarifying these points will lead to the correct formulation of the energy equation and the solution for the speed of block A.
cgotu2
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem:

The system shown in Figure P8.20 consists of a light inextensible cord, light frictionless pulleys, and blocks of equal mass. It is initially held at rest so that the blocks are at the same height above the ground. The blocks are then released. Find the speed of block A at the moment when the vertical separation of the blocks is h. (please see the attached picture)

I used the conservation of energy and said that (KE + PE)final = (KE + PE)initial. Then i said there was no initial KE because the system was at rest and said that there was no final PE, because it had all been converted into KE. so i got the following expression:

mgh + mg(h/2) = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2m(v/2)^2

i solved for v and got sqrt(2.4gh) but this is wrong
can someone tell me where my error is??
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
There is no requirement for the PE=0 or for all of the energy to be KE. You need an expression giving the velocity when the blocks are a distance h apart. Since h is not specified it could be small or large.
 
okay i tried that, but i am confused as to what to call the height in the initial PE. the only variables to be used are v,h and g. I could call it h, but that would mean it was the same h as the separation.

this is what i have: (keep in mind that i do not know what to call the beginning h in the PE)

(PE of A + PE of B + KE of A + KE of B)initial = (PE of A + PE of B + KE of A + KE of B)final
because the blocks are at rest in the beginning i got the KE of A and KE of B to be zero...my expression then becomes:

mg(h?) + mg(h?) = mgh + mg(h/2) + 1/2mv^2 + 1/2m(v/2)^2
 
Well, your last entry is on the right track, but there are a few points you need to consider...

1) For gravitational potential energy (GPE), you can SET the level of zero GPE. Once you have done that, the GPE at other levels will be relative to this level.

2) Instead of considering Conservation of Energy as "Sum of final energy = Sum of initial energy" (assuming no dissipative forces), why not think about it in terms of gain/ loss?
For this instance, it would be Gain in KE of A + Gain in KE of B + Gain in GPE of B = Loss in GPE of A. Do you know why block B should move up and block A should move down when the system is released?

3) Note that blocks A and B are connected by a cord, and if we assume the cord never becomes slack throughout the motion, then the speed of both blocks will be the same throughout the motion.

4) Finally, this point requires a little imagination. If block A has dropped by a height of x, what will be the height block B has risen? Knowing this, what are the distances each block has moved for their separation to eventually become h?

The problem may not be as simple as it sounds, but this should increase your determination in solving it and boost your level of satisfaction when you have finally solved it!
 
Last edited:
cgotu2 said:
okay i tried that, but i am confused as to what to call the height in the initial PE. the only variables to be used are v,h and g. I could call it h, but that would mean it was the same h as the separation.
You can take any position as your "zero PE" position. All that matters is the change in PE. So, why not take the initial position of the blocks to be where PE = 0? Thus you can define their initial postion to be at y = 0.
this is what i have: (keep in mind that i do not know what to call the beginning h in the PE)
(PE of A + PE of B + KE of A + KE of B)initial = (PE of A + PE of B + KE of A + KE of B)final
This is good.
because the blocks are at rest in the beginning i got the KE of A and KE of B to be zero...my expression then becomes:
mg(h?) + mg(h?) = mgh + mg(h/2) + 1/2mv^2 + 1/2m(v/2)^2
Instead of using "h" as a variable (which will get real confusing since "h" is also the value of their final separation), use "y".

Your equation correctly shows that mass A moves twice as fast as mass B. But also realize that when mass B rises by amount X, mass A lowers by amount 2X. (Your equation has that incorrect.) Use this fact to determine how much each block must move to have their separation equal to h. (Find their final y positions in terms of h.) Rewrite your energy equation correctly and you'll be able to solve for the speed.
 
My apologies... The third point in my previous post:
"Note that blocks A and B are connected by a cord, and if we assume the cord never becomes slack throughout the motion, then the speed of both blocks will be the same throughout the motion"
is incorrect.

Follow what was said in Doc Al's post and you should be able to obtain the right answer. All the best!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top