Set theory Definition and 439 Threads
-
I About the existence of Hamel basis for vector spaces
It is well known that a vector space always admits an algebraic (Hamel) basis. This is a theorem that follows from Zorn's lemma based on the Axiom of Choice (AC). Now consider any specific instance of vector space. Since the AC axiom may or may not be included in the underlying set theory...- cianfa72
- Thread
- Axioms Basis vectors Set theory Vector spaces Zfc
- Replies: 32
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra
-
P
I (0,1) is uncountable using binary expansions?
In the proof, we assume ##(0,1)## to be countable and we write \begin{align*}a_0&=0.a_{00}a_{01}a_{02}\ldots \\ a_1&=0.a_{10}a_{11}a_{12}\ldots \\ a_2&=0.a_{20}a_{21}a_{22}\ldots \\ &\vdots\end{align*}and so on for the elements ##a_0,a_1,\ldots## in ##(0,1)## (and where the expansions do not end...- psie
- Thread
- Cardinality Set theory
- Replies: 15
- Forum: General Math
-
I Countability of binary Strings
Looking at the countability of the set A, made up of all sequences whose elements are the digits 0 and 1, I've run into multiple interpretations/answers. One says the set is countable, because each natural number can be written as as a binary number. This allows for one one matching between the...- Mr X
- Thread
- Countability Set theory
- Replies: 18
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
P
I Construction of sigma-algebras: a counterexample
Consider a set ##X## and family of sets ##\mathcal E\subset\mathcal P(X)##. Let ##\mathcal E_1=\mathcal{E}\cup\{E^c:E\in\mathcal E\}## and then for ##j>1## define ##\mathcal E_j## to be the collection of all sets that are countable unions of sets in ##\mathcal E_{j-1}## or complements of such...- psie
- Thread
- Counterexample Measure theory Set theory
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
P
I Negation of statement involving cardinalities
In Folland's real analysis book, he defines the following expressions: $$\operatorname{card}(X)\leq\operatorname{card}(Y),\quad \operatorname{card}(X)=\operatorname{card}(Y),\quad \operatorname{card}(X)\geq\operatorname{card}(Y),$$to mean there exists an injection, bijection or surjection from...- psie
- Thread
- Cardinality Logic Set theory
- Replies: 10
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
B
Various Intuitions and Conceptualizations of Measurable Cardinals.
The concept of a "measurable cardinal" is rather difficult for many students of "Intermediate" Set Theory to grasp in terms of more basic set theoretic concepts -- as opposed say to concepts dealing with the relations among various "universes" or "models" etc. In fact, much of the problem may...- biffus22
- Thread
- Set theory
- Replies: 0
- Forum: STEM Educators and Teaching
-
Type of system for programming language based on mathematical set theory
A type in a programming language more or less specifies what values are allowed for a given type. A type has some similarities with a set, but most programming languages lack the operations which a set has. For example, in C one can define a new type based on two other types as a union of those...- elcaro
- Thread
- Set theory
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Programming and Computer Science
-
Z
Prove every subset of countable set is either finite or else countable
There are a lot of steps left out of this proof. Here is my proof with hopefully all the steps. I would like to know if it is correct Let ##A## be a countable set. Then ##A## is either finite or countably infinite. Case 1: ##A## is finite. There is a bijection ##f## from ##A## onto...- zenterix
- Thread
- Real analysis Set theory
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
Are the following statements true? (1) a∈{{a},{a,b}} and (2) b∈{{a},{a,b}} true?
TL;DR Summary: Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better. Albert Einstein. I am new to set theory. I got confused about above questions. For Q(1), I have two solutions, (a) because a is not the element of set {{a},{a,b}}, so a∈{{a},{a,b}} is False. (b) because...- john-ice2023
- Thread
- Set theory
- Replies: 8
- Forum: Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
-
I Question about about halting problem and this particular function
The most known proof of undecidability of the halting problem is about like that: #assume we have an hypothetical function that can determine whether any program P would halt on input i. def H1(P, i): """ H1 is a hypothetical function that determines whether program P halts on input i...- olgerm
- Thread
- Set theory
- Replies: 54
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
D
B I have an issue with Cantor's diagonal argument
I'm pretty bad at maths, got an A at gcse (uk 16 years old)then never went any further, I've been looking into cantors diagonal argument and I thing I found an issue, given how long its been around I'd imagine I'm not the first but couldn't any real number made using the construct by adding 1 to...- DanKnaD
- Thread
- Logic Set theory
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
K
I Is thermal noise a statistical uncertainty?
Hello! I have a system described by ##y=ax##, where a is the parameter I want to extract and y is the stuff I measure (we can assume that I can measure one instance of y without any uncertainty). x is a parameter I can control experimentally but it has an uncertainty associated to it. In a...- kelly0303
- Thread
- Set theory
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
I How to determine if a set is a semiring or a ring?
Let E be a finite nonempty set and let ## \Omega := E^{\mathbb{N}}##be the set of all E-valued sequences ##\omega = (\omega_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}F##or any ## \omega_1, \dots,\omega_n \in E ## Let ##[\omega_1, \dots,\omega_n]= \{\omega^, \in \Omega : \omega^,_i = \omega_i \forall i =1,\dots,n...- WMDhamnekar
- Thread
- Probability Ring Set Set theory
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
I May I use set theory to define the number of solutions of polynomials?
Let ##Q_{n}(x)## be the inverse of an nth-degree polynomial. Precisely, $$Q_{n}(x)=\displaystyle\frac{1}{P_{n}(x)}$$, It is of my interest to use the set notation to formally define a number, ##J_{n}## that provides the maximum number of solutions of ##Q_{n}(x)^{-1}=0##. Despite not knowing...- V9999
- Thread
- Polynomial Polynomials Set Set notation Set theory Theory
- Replies: 13
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
H
Proving that an Integer lies between x and y using Set Theory
## y-x \gt 1 \implies y \gt 1+x## Consider the set ##S## which is bounded by an integer ##m##, ## S= \{x+n : n\in N and x+n \lt m\}##. Let's say ##Max {S} = x+n_0##, then we have $$ x+n_0 \leq m \leq x+(n_0 +1)$$ We have, $$ x +n_0 \leq m \leq (x+1) +n_0 \lt y+ n_0 $$ Thus, ##x+n_0 \leq m \lt...- Hall
- Thread
- Integer Real analysis Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 15
- Forum: Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
-
How to Efficiently Handle Set Operations Without Inbuilt Functions?
ok we shall have ##(A-B)∩(A-C)= [1,y]∩[1,2,x,y]=[1,y]## correct?- chwala
- Thread
- Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
-
I What Makes the Next Generation of Set Theory So Intriguing?
https://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~mhe/papers/omniscient-journal-revised.pdf Might be my favorite article I’ve ever came across I would like to see some interpretations on it to broaden my currently very narrow point of view… Have fun! -oliver- ShellWillis
- Thread
- Generation Philosophy Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
I Common features of set theory and wave functions?
I would like to know if any of you think there's any sort of connection, analogy, or common features between, sets in set theory and wave functions in QT? Wave functions lack trajectories, so do sets. Wave functions also distribute over areas, as sets can do. To my understanding, wave...- Hallucinogen
- Thread
- Functions Set Set theory Theory Wave Wave functions
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
W
A Range of values for ##2^{\aleph_0}##
Ok, so assume we have a model for ZFC where CH does not hold. What values may ##2^{\aleph_0}## assume over said models?- WWGD
- Thread
- Logic Range Set theory
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
M
I Connection between Set Theory and Navier-Stokes equations?
Hi, I saw this video by numberphile, and near the end they mention how at the point of a right angle the equation shows infinite velocity for fluids. I'm wondering if this isn't perhaps related to Cantor's solution to Zeno's Paradox of distance (there's always a midpoint). Because I feel like at...- maxulu
- Thread
- Connection Navier-stokes Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
C
Can you use Taylor Series with mathematical objects other than points?
I was recently studying the pressure gradient force, and I found it interesting (though this may be incorrect) that you can use a Taylor expansion to pretend that the value of the internal pressure of the fluid does not matter at all, because the internal pressure forces that are a part of the...- cgrie
- Thread
- Calculus Mathematical Points Pressure gradient Series Set theory Taylor Taylor expansion Taylor series
- Replies: 4
- Forum: General Math
-
S
MHB Is Theorem 5.2 in SET THEORY AND LOGIC True or False?
In the book: SET THEORY AND LOGIC By ROBERT S.STOLL in page 19 the following theorem ,No 5.2 in the book ,is given: If,for all A, AUB=A ,then B=0 IS that true or false If false give a counter example If true give a proof- solakis1
- Thread
- Logic Set Set theory Theorem Theory
- Replies: 2
- Forum: General Math
-
C
I Question regarding quantifier statement
Suppose I have the following ( arbitrary ) statement: $$ \forall x\in{S} \ ( P(x) ) $$ Which means: For all x that belongs to S such that P(x). Can I write it as the following so that they are equivalent? ( although it is not conventional ): $$ \forall x\in{S} \land ( P(x) ) $$ Can I write...- CGandC
- Thread
- Logic Set theory
- Replies: 10
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
D
B My argument why Hilbert's Hotel is not a veridical Paradox
Hello there, I had another similar post, where asking for proof for Hilbert’s Hotel. After rethinking this topic, I want to show you a new example. It tries to show why that the sentence, every guest moves into the next room, hides the fact, that we don’t understand what will happen in this...- dakiprae
- Thread
- Argument Hilbert Infinity Paradox Set theory
- Replies: 8
- Forum: General Math
-
Munkres Topology Ch 1 ex#7) part (c) — basic set theory Q
Obviously the parenthetical part of the definition of ##F## means ##B\subset C## but we are not allowed to use ##\subset##. I do not know how to express implication with only union, intersection, and set minus without the side relation ##B\cap C = B\Leftrightarrow B\subset C##. This is using the...- benorin
- Thread
- Munkres Set Set theory Theory Topology
- Replies: 12
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
F
MHB Introduction to Set Theory Stream
Hello everyone. =) In honor of Pi Day I'm going to be explaining the very beginning of set theory (which I consider the beginning of university math) live on Twitch in about two hours (1 PM GMT). For those who do not know Twitch, it's a completely free streaming platform - you can come in and...- Fluxistence
- Thread
- Introduction Set Set theory Stream Theory
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
S
I Set Theory - the equivalence relation on elements
According to https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/zermelo-set-theory/ , Zermelo (translated) said: I don't know if that quote is part of his formal presentation. It does raise the question of whether set theory must formally assume that there exists an equivalence relation on "elements" of...- Stephen Tashi
- Thread
- Elements Equivalence Relation Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 14
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
R
B Can someone answer this doubt I have on Set theory?
"The fact that the above eleven properties are satisfied is often expressed by saying that the real numbers form a field with respect to the usual addition and multiplication operations." -what do these lines mean? in particular the line "form a field with respect to"? is it something like...- Rishabh Narula
- Thread
- Doubt Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 2
- Forum: General Math
-
A Higher Set Theory – Cantorian Sets / Large Cardinals in the Infinite
Zermelo-Fraenkel Axioms - the Axiom of Choice (ZFC), is conceptually incoherent. To me, they stole Cantor’s brilliant work and minimized it. Replies?- heff001
- Thread
- Infinite Set Set theory Sets Theory
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
S
On soundness and completeness of ZFC set theory
Homework Statement: See attached image. Homework Equations: ZFC set theory. Consider the text in the attached image. What is meant with "We require of an axiom system that it be possible to decide whether or not any given formula is an axiom."? Is consistency synonymous with soundness? Is...- schniefen
- Thread
- Set Set theory Theory Zfc
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
A
I Enumerating a Large Ordinal: Can We Find a Limit to the Continuum?
The following assertion quoted from the paper below seems as though it couldn’t be true. It is the issue that I would like some help addressing please: “The restriction of ##g(A)## to ##A \cap \omega_1## ensures that ##B## remains countable for this particular ##T## sequence.” ... Define...- AplanisTophet
- Thread
- Ordinal Set theory
- Replies: 27
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
C
MHB Topology Munkres Chapter 1 exercise 2 e- Set theory
Dear Everyone I am having some difficulties on exercise 2e from Topology 2nd ed by J. Munkres . Here are the directions: determine which of the following states are true for all sets [FONT=MathJax_Math-italic]A, [FONT=MathJax_Math-italic]B, [FONT=MathJax_Math-italic]C, and...- cbarker1
- Thread
- Exercise Munkres Set Set theory Theory Topology
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
C
MHB Topology Munkres Chapter 1 exercise 2 b and c- Set theory equivalent statements
Dear Every one, I am having some difficulties on exercise 2b and 2c from Topology 2nd ed by J. Munkres . Here are the directions: determine which of the following states are true for all sets $A$, $B$, $C$, and $D$. If a double implication fails, determine whether one or the other one of the...- cbarker1
- Thread
- Equivalent Exercise Munkres Set Set theory Theory Topology
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
J
A First order logic and set theory: who comes first?
Goldrei's Propositional and Predicate Calculus states, in page 13: "The countable union of countable sets is countable (...) This result is needed to prove our major result, the completeness theorem in Chapter 5. It depends on a principle called the axiom of choice." In other words: the most...- jordi
- Thread
- First order First order logic Logic Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
E
MHB Isomorphism of logic, arithmetic, and set theory
Has anybody ever heard of this? I learned about it in a discrete math class in grad school, and I've never heard of it anywhere else !? For example, logical disjunction (OR) and set-theoretic UNION are isomorphic in this sense: 0 OR 0 = 0. {0} UNION {0} = {0}. Similarly, logical AND & set...- Eric2
- Thread
- Arithmetic Isomorphism Logic Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
S
Is my Proof Valid for Bijection of Finite Sets?
<Moderator's note: Moved from a technical forum.> Hi PF, I am learning how to prove things (I have minimal background in math). Would the following proof be considered valid and rigorous? If not any pointers or tips would be much appreciated! Problem: Prove that the notion of number of...- sleepingMantis
- Thread
- Bijection Counting Proof Set theory Tips
- Replies: 15
- Forum: Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
-
B Question about CH (continuum hypothesis)
Is it possible to calculate this : Suppose the iterative root of ##2^x## : ##\phi(\phi(x))=2^x## (I suppose the Kneser calculation should work, it affirms that there is a real analytic solution) Then how to compute ##\phi(\aleph_0)## ? (We know that ##2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_1##). Could this be...- jk22
- Thread
- Continuum hypothesis Set theory Transfinite
- Replies: 13
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
I Cardinality of a set of constant symbols (model theory)
First, I want to be pedantic here and underline the distinction between a set (in the model, or interpretation) and a sentence (in the theory) which is fulfilled by that set, and also constant symbols (in the theory) versus constants (in the universe of the model) Given that, I would like to...- nomadreid
- Thread
- Cardinality Constant Logic Set Set theory Symbols Theory
- Replies: 2
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
B
I Is the Inverse Image of a Computable Function Recursively Enumerable?
Hello, I am stuck on deciding if given sets are recursive or recursively enumerable and why. Those sets are: set ƒ(A) = {y, ∃ x ∈ A ƒ(x) = y} and the second is set ƒ-1(A) = {x, ƒ(x) ∈ A} where A is a recursive set and ƒ : ℕ → ℕ is a computable function. I am new to computability theory and any...- Bedrich
- Thread
- Set Set theory
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
-
W
Set Theory: Power sets of Unions
Homework Statement I'm having issues understanding a mistake that I'm making, any assistance is appreciated! I know a counterexample but my attempt at proving the proposition is what's troubling me. Prove or disprove $$P(A \cup B) \subseteq P(A) \cup P(B) $$ Homework EquationsThe Attempt at...- WWCY
- Thread
- Power Set Set theory Sets Theory
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
How to write this in Set Theory notation?
Hello Everyone, I am trying to write the intersection of a physical problem in the most compact way. I am not really familiar with Set Theory notation, but I think it has the answer. It is about the intersection of two circular areas: - Area 1: A - Area 2: B If I want to write this in Set...- danielFiuza
- Thread
- Areas Notation Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
R
Set theory: Is my proof valid?
Homework Statement Prove the following for a given universe U A⊆B if and only if A∩(B compliment) = ∅ Homework EquationsThe Attempt at a Solution Assume A,B, (B compliment) are not ∅ if A∩(B compliment) = ∅, x∈A ∨ x∈ (B compliment), but not both If x∈A ∧ x∉(B compliment), then x∈B , because...- r0bHadz
- Thread
- Proof Set Set theory Theory
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
-
T
Image of a f with a local minima at all points is countable.
Homework Statement Let ##f:\Bbb{R} \to \Bbb{R}## be a function such that ##f## has a local minimum for all ##x \in \Bbb{R}## (This means that for each ##x \in \Bbb{R}## there is an ##\epsilon \gt 0## where if ##\vert x-t\vert \lt \epsilon## then ##f(x) \leq f(t)##.). Then the image of ##f## is...- Terrell
- Thread
- Image Local Minima Points Proof verification Real analysis Set theory
- Replies: 16
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
Question about a function of sets
Let a function ##f:X \to X## be defined. Let A and B be sets such that ##A \subseteq X## and ##B \subseteq X##. Then which of the following are correct ? a) ##f(A \cup B) = f(A) \cup f(B)## b) ##f(A \cap B) = f(A) \cap f(B)## c) ##f^{-1}(A \cup B) = f^{-1}(A) \cup f^{-1}(B)## d) ##f^{-1}(A \cap...- ubergewehr273
- Thread
- Function Functions Set theory Sets Subsets Topology
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
S
How can I prove that these relations are bijective maps?
<Moderator's note: Moved from a technical forum and thus no template. Also re-edited: Please use ## instead of $$.> If ##R_{1}## and ##R_{2}## are relations on a set S with ##R_{1};R_{2}=I=R_{2};R_{1}##. Then ##R_{1}## and ##R_{2}## are bijective maps ##R_{1};R_{2}## is a composition of two...- seismichills
- Thread
- Abstract algebra Relations Set theory
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
-
T
Showing ##\sqrt{2}\in\Bbb{R}## using Dedekind cuts
1. The problem statement, all variables and given Prove that ##\sqrt{2}\in\Bbb{R}## by showing ##x\cdot x=2## where ##x=A\vert B## is the cut in ##\Bbb{Q}## such that ##A=\{r\in\Bbb{Q}\quad \vert \quad r\leq 0 \quad\lor\quad r^2\lt 2\}##. I believe that I have to show ##A^2=L## however, it...- Terrell
- Thread
- proofs real numbers set theory
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
I How Does the Bernstein-Schröder Theorem Establish Set Equivalence?
The theorem: Let ##X##, ##Y## be sets. If there exist injections ##X \to Y## and ##Y \to X##, then ##X## and ##Y## are equivalent sets. Proof: Let ##f : X \rightarrow Y## and ##g : Y \rightarrow X## be injections. Each point ##x \in g(Y)⊆X## has a unique preimage ##y\in Y## under g; no ##x \in...- Wendel
- Thread
- Cantor Set theory Theorem
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Topology and Analysis
-
E
Proof by Induction of shortest suffix of concatenated string
Homework Statement Wherein α, β are strings, λ = ∅ = empty string, βr is the shortest suffix of the string β, βl is the longest prefix of the string β, and T* is the set of all strings in the Alphabet T, |α| denotes the length of a string α, and the operator ⋅ (dot) denotes concatenation of...- Enharmonics
- Thread
- Induction Logic Mathematical induction Proof Set notation Set theory String
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
E
Proof by Induction of String exponentiation? (Algorithms)
Homework Statement Wherein α is a string, λ = ∅ = the empty string, and T* is the set of all strings in the Alphabet T. Homework Equations (exp-Recursive-Clause 1) : α0 = λ (exp-Recursive-Clause 2) : αn+1 = (αn) ⋅ α The Attempt at a Solution [/B] This one is proving difficult for me. I...- Enharmonics
- Thread
- Algorithms Induction Mathematical induction Proof Set theory String
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
-
Z
I Countably Infinite Unions and the Real Numbers: Can They Really Be Uncountable?
Hello experts, Full disclosure: I am a total layman at math, nothing in my training aside from high school courses and one college calculus class. I'm sure a week doesn't pass without someone posting a question about or challenge to Cantor. I am not here to challenge anything but rather to...- Zedertie Dessen
- Thread
- Confusion Countability Real numbers Set theory
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics