MHB 1.3.11 Determine if b is a linear combination

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining if the vector b is a linear combination of the vectors a_1, a_2, and a_3. The reduced row echelon form (rref) of the augmented matrix indicates that there are two equations with three unknowns, suggesting multiple solutions may exist. The equations derived from the rref are x + 5z = 2 and y + 4z = 3, which can be solved for coefficients x, y, and z. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the definition of a linear combination in this context. Ultimately, the problem is resolved by demonstrating that b can indeed be expressed as a linear combination of the given vectors.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Determine if $b$ is a linear combination of $a_1,a_2$ and $a_3$
$$a_1\left[
\begin{array}{r}
1\\-2\\0 \end{array}\right],
a_2\left[
\begin{array}{r}
0\\1\\2
\end{array}\right],
a_3\left[
\begin{array}{r}
5\\-6\\8
\end{array}\right],
b=\left[
\begin{array}{r}
2\\-1\\6
\end{array}\right]$$
(rref) augmented matrix is
$$\left[
\begin{array}{ccc|c}
1 & 0 & 5 & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 4 & 3 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{array} \right]$$
from observation this is not a combination ok well I thot if the bottom row is all 0's then you have 2 equations and 3 answers so notalso, I thot (rref) was all just 1's or 0's
I did it on eMh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
Determine if $b$ is a linear combination of $a_1,a_2$ and $a_3$
$$a_1\left[
\begin{array}{r}
1\\-2\\0 \end{array}\right],
a_2\left[
\begin{array}{r}
0\\1\\2
\end{array}\right],
a_3\left[
\begin{array}{r}
5\\-6\\8
\end{array}\right],
b=\left[
\begin{array}{r}
2\\-1\\6
\end{array}\right]$$
(rref) augmented matrix is
$$\left[
\begin{array}{ccc|c}
1 & 0 & 5 & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 4 & 3 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{array} \right]$$
from observation this is not a combination ok well I thot if the bottom row is all 0's then you have 2 equations and 3 answers so notalso, I thot (rref) was all just 1's or 0's
I did it on eMh
You want to know whether $b$ is a linear combination of $a_1$, $a_2$ and $a_3$. So you want to know whether the equation $xa_1 + ya_2 + za_3 = b$ can be solved for $x$, $y$ and $z$. The rref matrix tells you that this is equivalent to solving the equations $$x + 5z = 2,$$ $$y+4z=3$$ (two equations for three unknowns, so there should be plenty of solutions). Try taking it from there.
 
It is remarkable how many people on this and other boards post problem of the form "show that 'a' is an 'X'" without knowing the definition of 'X'! I would think that, in that situation, the first thing one would do is look up the definition of 'X'.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It is remarkable how many people on this and other boards post problem of the form "show that 'a' is an 'X'" without knowing the definition of 'X'! I would think that, in that situation, the first thing one would do is look up the definition of 'X'.

They are both coefficients
 
karush said:
They are both coefficients
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean or what "both" refers to here. The "X" in my previous post was the term "linear combination". I was concerned with whether or not you know the definition of "linear combination".

A vector "u" is a "linear combination" of vectors v_1, v_2, …, v_n if and only if there exist scalars (numbers) C_1, C_2, … , C_n such that C_1v_1+ C_2v_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ C_nv_n= u.

Here the question is whether or not b= \begin{bmatrix}2 \\ -1 \\ 6 \end{bmatrix} is a linear combination of vectors a_1= <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ -2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span>
, a_2= <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span>
, and a_3= <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}5 \\ -6 \\ 8 \end{bmatrix}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span>
.

That is, do there exist numbers, C_1, C_2, and C_3 such that C_1<div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ -2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}+ C_2<div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}+ C_3<div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}5 \\ -6 \\ 8 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}C_1+ 5C_2 \\ -2C_1+ C_2- 6C_3 \\ 2C_2+ 8C_3\end{bmatrix}= <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}2 \\ -1 \\ 6 \end{bmatrix}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span></span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span></span></span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span></span></span></span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span></span></span></span>
.

That is the same as the three equations C_1+ 5C_2= 2, -2C_1+ C_2- 6C_3= -1, and 2C_2+ 8C_3= 6.

Yes, you can use the "augmented matrix" to solve those equations but jumping directly to that matrix makes me wonder if you understand where the matrix comes from rather than just using a memorized formula. From the first equation we get C_1= 2- 5C_2. From the third equation we get C_3= \frac{3}{4}- \frac{1}{4}C_2. Replacing C_1 and C_3 in the second equation with those, we get -2(2- 5C_2)+ C_2- 6\left(\frac{3}{4}- \frac{1}{4}C_2\right)= -4+ 10C_2+ C_2- \frac{9}{2}+ \frac{3}{2}C_2= \frac{25}{2}C_2- \frac{17}{2}= -1. \frac{25}{2}C_2= \frac{15}{2} so C_2= \frac{3}{5}. Then C_1= 2- 5C_2= 2- 3= -1 and C_3= \frac{3}{4}- \frac{1}{4}C_2= \frac{3}{4}- \frac{3}{20}= \frac{15- 3}{20}= \frac{3}{5}.

The problem only asked whether b could be written as a linear combination of the other vectors but showing that linear combination is the best way to show it exists.






 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K