MHB 1.3.11 Determine if b is a linear combination

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Determine if $b$ is a linear combination of $a_1,a_2$ and $a_3$
$$a_1\left[
\begin{array}{r}
1\\-2\\0 \end{array}\right],
a_2\left[
\begin{array}{r}
0\\1\\2
\end{array}\right],
a_3\left[
\begin{array}{r}
5\\-6\\8
\end{array}\right],
b=\left[
\begin{array}{r}
2\\-1\\6
\end{array}\right]$$
(rref) augmented matrix is
$$\left[
\begin{array}{ccc|c}
1 & 0 & 5 & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 4 & 3 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{array} \right]$$
from observation this is not a combination ok well I thot if the bottom row is all 0's then you have 2 equations and 3 answers so notalso, I thot (rref) was all just 1's or 0's
I did it on eMh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
Determine if $b$ is a linear combination of $a_1,a_2$ and $a_3$
$$a_1\left[
\begin{array}{r}
1\\-2\\0 \end{array}\right],
a_2\left[
\begin{array}{r}
0\\1\\2
\end{array}\right],
a_3\left[
\begin{array}{r}
5\\-6\\8
\end{array}\right],
b=\left[
\begin{array}{r}
2\\-1\\6
\end{array}\right]$$
(rref) augmented matrix is
$$\left[
\begin{array}{ccc|c}
1 & 0 & 5 & 2 \\
0 & 1 & 4 & 3 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{array} \right]$$
from observation this is not a combination ok well I thot if the bottom row is all 0's then you have 2 equations and 3 answers so notalso, I thot (rref) was all just 1's or 0's
I did it on eMh
You want to know whether $b$ is a linear combination of $a_1$, $a_2$ and $a_3$. So you want to know whether the equation $xa_1 + ya_2 + za_3 = b$ can be solved for $x$, $y$ and $z$. The rref matrix tells you that this is equivalent to solving the equations $$x + 5z = 2,$$ $$y+4z=3$$ (two equations for three unknowns, so there should be plenty of solutions). Try taking it from there.
 
It is remarkable how many people on this and other boards post problem of the form "show that 'a' is an 'X'" without knowing the definition of 'X'! I would think that, in that situation, the first thing one would do is look up the definition of 'X'.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It is remarkable how many people on this and other boards post problem of the form "show that 'a' is an 'X'" without knowing the definition of 'X'! I would think that, in that situation, the first thing one would do is look up the definition of 'X'.

They are both coefficients
 
karush said:
They are both coefficients
I have no idea what this is supposed to mean or what "both" refers to here. The "X" in my previous post was the term "linear combination". I was concerned with whether or not you know the definition of "linear combination".

A vector "u" is a "linear combination" of vectors v_1, v_2, …, v_n if and only if there exist scalars (numbers) C_1, C_2, … , C_n such that C_1v_1+ C_2v_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ C_nv_n= u.

Here the question is whether or not b= \begin{bmatrix}2 \\ -1 \\ 6 \end{bmatrix} is a linear combination of vectors a_1= <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ -2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span>
, a_2= <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span>
, and a_3= <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}5 \\ -6 \\ 8 \end{bmatrix}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span>
.

That is, do there exist numbers, C_1, C_2, and C_3 such that C_1<div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ -2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}+ C_2<div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1 \\ 2 \end{bmatrix}+ C_3<div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}5 \\ -6 \\ 8 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}C_1+ 5C_2 \\ -2C_1+ C_2- 6C_3 \\ 2C_2+ 8C_3\end{bmatrix}= <div style="text-align: left"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">\begin{bmatrix}2 \\ -1 \\ 6 \end{bmatrix}</span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span></span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span></span></span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span></span></span></span>&#8203;</div><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><br /> </span></span></span></span>
.

That is the same as the three equations C_1+ 5C_2= 2, -2C_1+ C_2- 6C_3= -1, and 2C_2+ 8C_3= 6.

Yes, you can use the "augmented matrix" to solve those equations but jumping directly to that matrix makes me wonder if you understand where the matrix comes from rather than just using a memorized formula. From the first equation we get C_1= 2- 5C_2. From the third equation we get C_3= \frac{3}{4}- \frac{1}{4}C_2. Replacing C_1 and C_3 in the second equation with those, we get -2(2- 5C_2)+ C_2- 6\left(\frac{3}{4}- \frac{1}{4}C_2\right)= -4+ 10C_2+ C_2- \frac{9}{2}+ \frac{3}{2}C_2= \frac{25}{2}C_2- \frac{17}{2}= -1. \frac{25}{2}C_2= \frac{15}{2} so C_2= \frac{3}{5}. Then C_1= 2- 5C_2= 2- 3= -1 and C_3= \frac{3}{4}- \frac{1}{4}C_2= \frac{3}{4}- \frac{3}{20}= \frac{15- 3}{20}= \frac{3}{5}.

The problem only asked whether b could be written as a linear combination of the other vectors but showing that linear combination is the best way to show it exists.






 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
965
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top