MHB 12.6 linearly dependent or linearly independent?

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Are the vectors
$$v_1=x^2+1
,\quad v_2=x+2
,\quad v_3=x^2+2x$$
linearly dependent or linearly independent?
if
$$c_1(x^2+1)+c_2(x+2)+c_3(x^2+2x)=0$$
is the system
$$\begin{array}{rrrrr}
&c_1 & &c_3 = &0\\
& &c_2 &2c_3= &0\\
&c_1 &2c_2& = &0
\end{array}$$
I presume at this point observation can be made that this linear dependent
but also...
$$\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 2 & 0 \\ 1 & 2 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right]
\sim
\left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right]$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
With a set of functions, you normally use the Wronskian to determine linear independence.
 
"
I presume at this point observation can be made that this linear dependent"
Why would you presume that?

Perhaps it is just the way I learned systems of equations but I never want to change to matrices to solve systems of equations!

To determine whether or not v_1= x^2+ 1, v_2= x+ 2, and v_3= x^2+ 2x are independent or dependent we need to decide if there exist numbers, a, b, and c, no all 0, such that av_1+ bv_2+ cv_3= a(x^2+ 1)+ b(x+ 2)+ c(x^2+ 2x)= (a+ c)x^2+ (b+ 2c)x+ (a+ 2b)= 0.

In order that a polynomial be 0 for all x, all coefficients must be 0 so we must have
a+ c= 0
b+ 2c= 0
a+ 2b= 0

From the first equation c= -a so the second equation can be written as b+ 2(-a)= b- 2a= 0. Then b= 2a so the third equation is a+ 2(2a)= 5a= 0. a= 0 so b= 2(0)= 0 and c= -0= 0. The only solution is a= b= c= 0 so the vectors are independent.
 
Ackbach said:
With a set of functions, you normally use the Wronskian to determine linear independence.

ok we haven't done that yet
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K