14MeV neutrons in MCNP interact with carbon without producing alpha

AI Thread Summary
14MeV neutrons in MCNP interact with carbon without producing alpha particles or protons, raising questions about cross section data. Users have experimented with various cross section libraries, including ENDFB8 and JEFF3.3, but encountered issues with alpha particle production when using the phys:n model. To address these issues, it's suggested to set specific parameters in the phys:n and cut:h cards and to enable the INCL4/ABLA model for improved alpha release. However, discrepancies remain between MCNP results and PHITS, particularly regarding energy spectrum calculations for alpha particles. The discussion emphasizes the need for correct model settings and cross section plotting to resolve these inconsistencies.
jianggong
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
14MeV neutrons in MCNP interact with carbon without producing alpha particles and protons, yes Questions about my cross section data?
I've tried ENDFB8/B7.1, JEFF3.3, JENDL5, CENDL3.2 without any results, but if you use phys:n model, it looks like alpha particles will be produced, but it doesn't seem to be what I expected. How can I solve it? Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi,
The 7th parameter of the “phys:n” card and “phys:p” must be set to 1 to ensure the generation and transport of recoil and (n,p) protons as well as recoil heavy ions.
The 1st entry of the “cut:h, a, #” card must set to 1 keV to transport the whole particles above this cut-off energy.
In order to improve the release of secondary alpha, the INCL4/ABLA model is turned on adding the LCA card with the 9th entry, “icem” set to 2.
You can see this publication :
https://www.researchgate.net/public...ssment_for_neutrons_between_100_keV_to_19_MeV
 
Thank you very much for your answer, but after I modified it according to your prompt, it shows that I used it incorrectly. Is there any problem
 

Attachments

  • 无标题.png
    无标题.png
    34.7 KB · Views: 149
  • 无标题0.png
    无标题0.png
    5.8 KB · Views: 143
When heavy ion transport is cancelled, the program is ready to run. However, the physical model must also be used, and the α transport results are different from the measured results, but the PHITS results are accurate. Don't know what the problem is
 
I'm not sure I can help much, but do you need heavy ion transport for the results or will production rate do?

Have you tried plotting the cross section? Warnings that models are being used is normally a sign cross section tables are missing.

I notice @PSRB191921 said to set phys n and p cards (neutron and photon) and you've set n and h cards (neutron and proton) and I don't know if this is a correction or a mistake.
 
Alex A said:
I'm not sure I can help much, but do you need heavy ion transport for the results or will production rate do?

Have you tried plotting the cross section? Warnings that models are being used is normally a sign cross section tables are missing.

I notice @PSRB191921 said to set phys n and p cards (neutron and photon) and you've set n and h cards (neutron and proton) and I don't know if this is a correction or a mistake.
Thank you very much for your reply. I need to calculate the energy spectrum deposited by alpha particles generated by neutron and C in C. Currently, the program cannot carry out INCL physical model and heavy ion transport at the same time. When I use the physical model of neutron and C alone and make alpha particles deposit energy in the way of INCL, the program can run. However, there is a certain gap between the transport results and PHITS. I don't know what the problem is.
 

Attachments

  • 无标题00.png
    无标题00.png
    22.1 KB · Views: 143
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top