1D Quantum Well - I'm getting something very basic wrong

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to a one-dimensional quantum well, specifically focusing on calculating the number of energy levels based on given parameters such as width and barrier height.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the energy level equation and the appropriate units for mass and energy. There are attempts to reconcile discrepancies in calculated values for n², with some participants questioning unit consistency and the use of constants.

Discussion Status

The conversation has led to some productive guidance regarding unit conversions and the importance of consistency in calculations. Participants are actively engaging with each other's reasoning, and some have identified potential errors in their approaches.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific values for constants and the need to convert energy units, indicating that participants are navigating the complexities of unit systems in quantum mechanics.

neural_jam
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Ok, so this example question is in my lecture notes:

Homework Statement



"For a 1-D quantum well, 5nm width, 2eV barrier height, calculate the number of energy levels in the well."

Homework Equations



So the equation given is a familiar one:

[tex]E_n=\frac{n^2 \pi^2 \hbar^2}{2 m L^2}[/tex]

and he also said [tex]E_n=2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19} J[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, in the lecture [tex]n^2[/tex] came out to be 134, but I keep getting ~1.9, so I'm using the wrong units somewhere or something, because otherwise it's a pretty simple 'plug and chug' exercise..!

also, I'm using
[tex]\hbar = 6.582 \times 10^{-16} eVs[/tex]
[tex]m = 0.511MeV[/tex]

Can anyone help? :-s

-Jam
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the units of mass are

[tex][m] = eV/c^2[/tex]

And therefore with the values that you are using it should be

[tex]E_n=\frac{n^2 \pi^2 \hbar^2 c^2}{2 m L^2}[/tex]
 
Hi, thanks for the reply!

Unfortunately, if I put in the factor of [tex]c^2[/tex], then [tex]n^2[/tex] becomes ~[tex]2.13^{-17}[/tex], even further off the 134 that it should be :-(
 
Make sure that you use the same units for everything. That is if you use electron volts as you said in your first post then E = 2 eV. If you use Joules for E then you have to use Js for h, kg for m (without c^2 this time) and so on.
 
I get 133, which seems pretty close... it's probably just a silly math mistake. If you write out the details of your calculations (and please be consistent with the units ;-), someone can probably pinpoint where it went wrong.
 
Ah, thankyou! Yes, it was a silly mistake, I forgot to change [tex]E=2 \times 1.6 \times 10^{-19}[/tex] to E = 2, yes it works out fine now.

Thank you both, I have an exam tomorrow where this will likely be part of a question or two, so I'm very grateful for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K