2 span beam with 2 points loads. Statically indeterminate?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a statically indeterminate beam structure with two point loads located between spans B and C. Participants explore the implications of the beam's support conditions and how they affect the analysis of the system, considering various methods and theoretical approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the beam appears statically indeterminate due to the bolted connections at supports A, B, and C, questioning whether the left span A-B should be considered in the analysis.
  • Another participant recalls a "theorem of three moments" that may apply to similar systems, although they do not provide detailed guidance.
  • A correction is made regarding the terminology, specifying the "theorem of three moments" as a relevant concept for the analysis.
  • Discussion arises about whether the connections at A, B, and C allow for rotation, which would influence whether the beam can be treated as a continuous beam or if each span can be analyzed separately.
  • One participant clarifies that the supports consist of blocks welded to the beam and bolted to a rigid column, suggesting that the beam will not rotate at the supports.
  • A later reply challenges the rigidity of the connections, indicating that if they are indeed rigidly fixed, the problem is statically indeterminate and requires additional equations to solve for unknowns.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the connections at the supports and their implications for the analysis. There is no consensus on whether the beam can be treated as a continuous beam or if it should be analyzed in sections, indicating ongoing debate and uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the problem due to the potential for rotation at the supports and the implications of rigid versus pinned connections, which remain unresolved. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of the assumptions made regarding support conditions.

Mech King
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm just pondering a beam problem fir a structure that I'm analysing. It appears statically indeterminate to me? The beam is bolted to a support at locations A,B & C. There are two point loads between span B-C.

There are no symmetrical distances or support locations etc.

Initially, I just ignored span A-B, as I assumed that the load would not transfer to the far left hand end at A, because it is rigidly fixed at B & C? Is this incorrect?

Now I am thinking that I do need to consider the left hand span AB.

I thought that I could assume "A" does not support the beam, then calculate the deflection of the beam at the left hand side in the unsupported region and then calculate what the restoring force would need to be to prevent such deflection, therefore calculating reaction A, and then take moments to calculate reactions B and C?

Or is there a better approach? I'm really getting a bit stuck here and would appreciate any guidance!

Many thanks
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1376685609.848780.jpg
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Mech King,

I'm sure I read something in a book about a similar system. It was a long time ago, but if my memory serves me right, it mentioned something about a "3 moment system". I'm sorry I can't help you more.
 
It comes down to whether the connections at A, B, and C will allow the beam to rotate with respect to the longitudinal axis of the beam. You say they are bolted connections, but do you have any further details? If rotation can occur, you have a classic continuous beam. If the bolted connections do not allow rotation, then each span can be analyzed individually, assuming full fixed connections at A, B, and C.
 
Tax on Fear and steam king, thanks a lot for your input! Both methods make sense to me and I agree.

The supports at at A B and C consist of a block welded to each side of the support/beam and bolted to a column, which I will consider to be rigid.

I guess the beam won't rotate at its supports because it is built in at each support. I was unsure if I could just look at the section BC in isolation, but thanks Steam King for the direction! Also, thanks for the references Tax on Fear; I can use this for a similar problem I have :D.
Very much appreciated guys!

Thanks
 
You mentioned that A, B, and C are bolted to a support and are rigidly fixed, but the picture shows pinned connections. If they really are rigidly fixed, you have a statically indeterminate problem because statics won't give you all the equations you need to solve for all the unknowns. You really only have the Y-direction equation and the moment equations at A, B, and C to work with, and your unknowns are the 3 vertical reactions and the 3 moments at each of the rigid supports.

Even just looking at BC, it's statically indeterminate if they're rigid connections. You'll have to use mechanics of materials equations to solve for the reaction moments.
 

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K