200kg Astronaut, 2.0 m/s, 100.0 N rocket ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacksonjw81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronaut Rocket
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 200 kg astronaut moving at a velocity of 2.0 m/s toward an orbiting spacecraft and requires determining how long the astronaut must fire a 100.0 N rocket backpack to stop relative to the spacecraft. The subject area includes dynamics and the application of Newton's laws of motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of force and momentum, questioning the initial calculations and unit conversions. There are suggestions to apply the force for a specific duration to observe changes in velocity.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaged in clarifying the relationship between force, mass, and momentum. There is an exploration of how the rocket's thrust affects the astronaut's motion, with some guidance provided on interpreting the results of the calculations. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding unit conversions and the definitions of force versus momentum. There is an acknowledgment of the potential for misinterpretation of the problem setup and the calculations involved.

jacksonjw81
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] 200kg Astronaut, 2.0 m/s, 100.0 N rocket ?

A 200.0 kg astronaut and equipment move with a velocity of 2.00 m/s toward an orbiting spacecraft . How long will the astronaut need to fire a 100.0 N rocket backpack to stop the motion relative to the spacecraft ? Give your answer in s.

Homework Equations


F=ma
W=mg
m=w/g
a=F/m

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I am missing something so simple. I have spent too long trying to solve this problem and have given up.

F=(200kg)(2 m/s)=400 kg*m/s=
F=400N/s

I don't know what to do with the 100N for the rocket pack, I'm getting lost in all the different conversions.

Please Help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you start by applying 100N for one second, and see what the final speed is?

There is definitely a way to apply the equations, but understand it intuitively and it'll make more sense.

Also, in your "F=(200kg)(2 m/s)=400 kg*m/s^2", you have an extra 1/s on the right side.
 
jacksonjw81 said:
F=(200kg)(2 m/s)=400 kg*m/s^2
Look again at the units. That should be 200\,\text{kg} 2\,\text{m}/\text{s} = 400 \,\text{kg-m}/\text{s}. The product of velocity and mass is momentum, not force. An alternative expression for kg-m/s is Newton-seconds. That 400 kg-m/sec is the same as 400 Newton-seconds, and this form should tell you exactly how long the rocket pack needs to be fired.
 
D H said:
Look again at the units. That should be 200\,\text{kg} 2\,\text{m}/\text{s} = 400 \,\text{kg-m}/\text{s}. The product of velocity and mass is momentum, not force. An alternative expression for kg-m/s is Newton-seconds. That 400 kg-m/sec is the same as 400 Newton-seconds, and this form should tell you exactly how long the rocket pack needs to be fired.

So if the Astronaut has a Force of 400 Newton-seconds and he fires a 100 N rocket then the answer will be 4 s?

If that is the correct answer I'm going to be pissed that is the solution I came up with when I first began working this problem. But, thought that it was to easy and couldn't be right.
 
Pretty much. For each 100N force applied for 1 second, the decrease in velocity is 0.5m/s.

In 4 seconds, -2.0 m/s decrease in velocity.

Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
iloveflickr said:
Pretty much. For each 100N force applied for 1 second, the decrease in velocity is 0.5m/s.

In 4 seconds, -2.0 m/s decrease in acceleration.

Enjoy.

Thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K