2D electric field distribution in electrolyte solution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the electric field distribution from a planar electrode in an electrolyte solution, specifically 0.5 mM NaCl in water. Key parameters include the applied potential, ionic strength, and dielectric constant of the medium. The conversation emphasizes the need to account for the potential drop across the Stern layer and the exponential decay in the diffuse layer, utilizing the Poisson-Boltzmann equation for modeling. The importance of electrode geometry, particularly the role of the counter electrode, is highlighted as crucial for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation
  • Knowledge of electric double layer (EDL) concepts
  • Familiarity with ionic strength and dielectric constants
  • Basic principles of electrochemistry and electrode geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation in electrochemistry
  • Study the effects of electric double layer on electric field distribution
  • Explore modeling techniques for different electrode geometries
  • Investigate the impact of ionic strength on electric field behavior in electrolytes
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, electrochemists, and physicists interested in modeling electric field distributions in electrolyte solutions, particularly those working with planar electrodes and electric double layers.

CheesyG
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How can I determine the electric field distribution in an electrolyte solution when applying a given potential to electrodes?
Hi there,

How can I determine the electric field distribution from a planar electrode? The known parameters are potential applied to the electrode, ionic strength and dielectric constant of the medium. (E.g. for the most simple case 0.5 mM NaCl in water)

I'm having difficulty finding a straightforward explanation to do this. I'd want to account for the potential drop across the Stern layer and the exponential decay of potential in the diffuse layer to get a complete picture of electric field distribution. BC is potential --> 0 as x --> infinity.

One case would be for an infinite planar electrode, another would be for a small 100nm planar electrode in a cavity.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
This is more of a physics problem. Sure, chemistry will add its own complications, as the medium is not homogeneous and can change in the electric field, but as the first approximation I would look for physics models for the electric field in vacuum, something around the Poisson equation if memory serves me well (I can be terribly wrong here, haven't visited this territory in ages).

I have problems understanding your setup though, you can't apply potential using a single electrode, and the presence and location of the counter electrode (geometry of the system) is probably crucial element of the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
Thanks Borek!

We would apply the potential between the working and counter electrodes.

The problem also needs to account for field screening due to the presence of the electric double layer. (Electric field distribution in vacuum is much more straightforward!)

I would also make a few assumptions :

- The potential decays to 0 in the bulk solution such that we treat the working electrode independently

- we ignore iR drop, or any other effects of solution resistance

I think this should be a straightforward problem, but I’m having a hard time finding a simple expression for electric field distribution taking into account the stern and diffuse layers of the EDL (or figuring out how best to approach this). Then how to approach the problem different electrode geometries or surface areas.

Hope this makes sense,
Cheers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K