2D quantum harmonic oscillator in cylindrical coordinates (radial part

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the radial part of the Schrödinger equation for a 2D quantum harmonic oscillator in cylindrical coordinates, specifically the Hamiltonian defined as \(\mathcal{H}=\frac{1}{2m}\left[\hbar^2\left(\frac{d^2}{d r^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{d r}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d^2}{d \phi^2}\right)+m^2\omega^2 r^2\right]\). The user expresses difficulty in finding an analytical solution for the radial equation \(r^2R''+rR'+\left(r^2E-m^2-\omega^2r^4\right)R=0\) without resorting to a power series approach. The discussion highlights the importance of recognizing the degeneracy of eigenstates and suggests that Laguerre polynomials may be relevant, although the user is uncertain about their application.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically the Schrödinger equation.
  • Familiarity with cylindrical coordinates and their application in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of harmonic oscillators and their energy eigenvalues.
  • Experience with special functions, including Bessel and Laguerre polynomials.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Laguerre polynomials in solving radial equations in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the separation of variables technique in cylindrical coordinates for quantum systems.
  • Explore the role of Bessel functions in similar problems without harmonic potentials.
  • Review W. Pauli's "Wave Mechanics" for insights on the 2D quantum harmonic oscillator.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students, and researchers working on quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on harmonic oscillators and cylindrical coordinate systems.

D0m2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear kind helpers,

actually I am not 100% sure whether this is the right place to post, as it is not a homework in the sense of an exercise sheet. But I think it could be because it feels pretty basic and that I should be able to solve it. Though I really searched for a solution but could not find one.
What made me hesitate to post here, is that I am not sure, whether there is an analytic solution to my problem at all.
So I hope to have found the right place to post. Please excuse if not.

My problem is the following: I've got an effective 2D harmonic oscillator potential (no degree of freedom in z)
V(r)=\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2(x^2+y^2)
so the Hamiltonian is
\mathcal{H}=\frac{1}{2m}\left[\left(\frac{\hbar}{i}\nabla\right)^2+m^2\omega^2(x^2+y^2)\right]
(where I allowed me to use \nabla=\left(\frac{d}{dx},\frac{d}{dy}\right)
I could, of course, solve this easily in cartesian coordinates as two one dimensional oscillators with the energy eigenvalues
E=\left(n_x+n_y+\hbar\omega\right)
with the corresponding wavefunctions, which I could, with the aid of Griffiths, calculate pretty easily.

The important point is however, the rotational symmetrie around the z-Axis to underline the degeneracy of the eigenstates.
That is where cylindrical coordinates become obvious.
with r^2=x^2+y^2 the Hamiltonian should become:
\mathcal{H}=\frac{1}{2m}\left[\hbar^2\left(\frac{d^2}{d r^2}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{d r}+\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d^2}{d \phi^2}\right)+m^2\omega^2 r^2\right]

plugging it into the Schrödinger equation and doing a separation of variables (\Psi=R\Phi)
the angular part is easy:
\Phi=\Phi_0 e^{im\phi} \text{where}\ m=\pm 0,\pm 1,\dots

back into the Schrödinger equation leaves me with the radial part:
r^2R''+rR'+\left(r^2E-m^2-\omega^2r^4\right)R=0

But I cannot find a solution to this Problem. But I have to add one last thing: I would rather not want to use a powerseries approach for some reason. That is why I didn't try yet. I hope someone nows a better solution?
Without the harmonic potential part, Bessel functions would solve it. For a similar Problem in three dimensions spherical harmonics. In cartesian coordinates (without seperating the angular part) hermite polynomials. For some reason, Laguerre polynomials seem appealing, but I could not really say way.
But for this problem? Did I make a mistake? Am I mistaken, that the solution should depend only on one quantum number?

I hope I made it clear what my problem is, and that someone here nows an answer, or at least if this is analytically solvable or not. And if someone has, citations would be nice of course.

Best regards

D0m2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the physics forums!

You find an excellent treatment of your problem in

W. Pauli, Wave Mechanics (Vol. 5 of the Pauli Lectures on Physics)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K