2nd order partial differential equation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the second-order partial differential equation U_x_y - yU_y = e^x. The initial attempt involved substituting V = U_y and using an integrating factor, but the integrating factor was incorrectly derived. Participants clarified that the integration should be performed with respect to x while treating y as a constant. The correct integrating factor was established as e^{-xy}, leading to a revised expression for V. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper integration techniques and the need for initial conditions to fully determine the solution.
pk415
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello all, this is my first post and I'm having trouble with some homework. Here is the problem:

Solve:
U_x_y - yU_y = e^x

I tried subbing V = U_y then I have

V_x - yV = e^x

I solve this as a linear equation with an integrating factor of e^{-\frac{1}{2}y^2}

and get

V = e^{\frac{1}{2}y^2}*(e^{-\frac{1}{2}y^2} \int e^x dx + f(y))

V = e^x + e^{\frac{1}{2}y^2}*f(y)

or
U_y = e^x + e^{\frac{1}{2}y^2}*f(y)

Now, how do I integrate the second part wrt y?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the wrong integrating factor. You integrated with respect to y to find it when you should have integrated with respect to x, treating y as a constant.

The function of y that you end up with in your result cannot be integrated without some sort of initial condition to let you determine what the function is.

For example, say you were given U_y(x=0,y) = y, then solving for f(y) (using the equation for U_y I arrived at) gives f(y) = y - \frac{1}{1-y}.

An initial condition U(x=a,y) = g(y) may be harder to solve, since it would involve an integral over f(y), though I would think you could just differentiate or Laplace transform to solve for f(y).
 
Last edited:
Thanks Mute

So then my integrating factor should be

e^{-xy} right?

Then I have

V = e^{xy}[\int e^{-xy}e^x + f(y)]

V = e^{xy}[e^{1-y} \int e^x + f(y)]

V = e^{xy}[e^{1-y}e^x + f(y)]

V = e^{xy+x-y+1} + e^{xy}f(y)

U_y = e^{(x-1)y+x+1} + e^{xy}f(y)

And I was thinking I could bring the e^y into the generic function f(y) to get

U_y = e^{(x-1)y+x+1} + e^xf(y)

then integrate wrt y and get

U=\frac{1}{x-1}e^{(x-1)y+x+1} + e^xg(y) + h(x)

But when I put this U back into the original equation it doesn't work...

Does this make any sense?
 
The integrating factor is correct now, but you seem to be making the mistake e^{ab} = e^ae^b. The correct laws are (e^a)^b = e^{ab} and e^{a+b} = e^ae^b.

So, you should get

e^{-xy}V = \left[\int dx~e^{-xy}e^x\right] + f(y)= \left[\int dx~e^{x(1-y)}\right] + f(y) = \frac{e^{-xy}e^x}{1-y} + f(y)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K