3^2x=5(3^x)+36 whats the exact value of x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aisha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation 3^2x = 5(3^x) + 36. Participants clarify that A should equal 3^x, not 3x, and discuss the factoring of the quadratic, identifying a mistake in the original factorization. The correct approach involves setting 3^x = 4 and using logarithms to find x, specifically x = log_3(4) or x = ln(4)/ln(3). One participant confirms that only one real solution exists due to the nature of exponential functions, emphasizing that negative results are not valid. The conversation concludes with a consensus on the correct methods for solving the equation.
aisha
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
I let A=3x and then i got (A-9)(A-4) when i factored the quadratic. Then when I got a common base of 3 I solved one x value to be x=2 but I am not sure about the other one? 3^x=4 what is the common base? I used the graphing calculator instead and got x=1.26 is this correct? could i have done it another way? :rolleyes:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A=3^x not 3x right?

I've not checked your algebra but assuming it is right:

3^x = 4

x = \log_3 4

or:

3^x = 4

\ln \left( 3^x \right) = \ln (4)

x \ln (3) = \ln(4)

x = \frac{\ln(4)}{\ln(3)}

Edit: You have made a mistake, check your pluses and minus when you factored again, there is only one real root.
 
Last edited:
Thanks I got it :smile:
 
aisha said:
I let A=3x and then i got (A-9)(A-4) when i factored the quadratic. Then when I got a common base of 3 I solved one x value to be x=2 but I am not sure about the other one? 3^x=4 what is the common base? I used the graphing calculator instead and got x=1.26 is this correct? could i have done it another way? :rolleyes:

Final answer,.........YES.But the equation subject of this post will not appear in the solution to your problem,as the decomposition u found was wrong.It should have stated (A-9)(A+4) with only the "9" sollution adittable,since the exponetial of real numbers cannot be negative.
Anyway,for the equation u stated,here goes my say:
U got 3^x =4.Apply logarithm in any base on both sides of the eq.Apply it in the base 3 to find:x=\log_{3} 4.Apply in the "natural" basis to find:x=\frac{\ln 4}{\ln 3}.
Take the pocket intelligent calculator (the one with scientifical functions) and compute the ratio between the 2 natural logarithms and you"ll find "x" with a staggering approximation (actuatlly the calculator's number of possible decimals).

Equations like the one u encountered (the last one) are called transcendental equations and,in general,solutions are transcendental numbers,i.e. numbers like "e" and "pi".

Daniel.

PS.Edit:Zurtex,i hadn't seen yor post,as i would have cut mine to half,sice you dealt with the transcedental eq.
 
Last edited:
dextercioby said:
Final answer,.........YES.
U have done magnificiently up until the last equation.
U got 3^x =4.Apply logarithm in any base on both sides of the eq.Apply it in the base 3 to find:x=\log_{3} 4.Apply in the "natural" basis to find:x=\frac{\ln 4}{\ln 3}.
Take the pocket intelligent calculator (the one with scientifical functions) and compute the ratio between the 2 natural logarithms and you"ll find "x" with a staggering approximation (actuatlly the calculator's number of possible decimals).

Equations like the one u encountered (the last one) are called transcendental equations and,in general,solutions are transcendental numbers,i.e. numbers like "e" and "pi".

Daniel.
Since one value was negative I think there is no solution for that one since when a positive base is raised to any exponent the result should be a positive value. We are not doing log this year, thanks for ur help!
 
aisha said:
Since one value was negative I think there is no solution for that one since when a positive base is raised to any exponent the result should be a positive value. We are not doing log this year, thanks for ur help!

I edited my post.I assumed that the decomposition u found was correct (and so did Zurtex),so i proceded with the unclarities regarding the last equation.
Now my post makes perfect sense.Almost... :-p
 
I don't understand am I wrong?
 
aisha said:
I let A=3x and then i got (A-9)(A-4) when i factored the quadratic.

YES,but,thankfully u figured out the mistake.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
812
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
979
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K