3 Mil Jobs lost to China are returning to the U.S.

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DoggerDan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    China Jobs Lost
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential return of jobs from China to the U.S., with a focus on the factors influencing this trend, including wage differences, productivity, and logistical considerations. Participants explore the implications of currency valuation and economic policies, as well as the broader context of U.S.-China relations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that upwards of 3 million jobs are projected to return to the U.S. due to rising Chinese wages and American productivity, although the timeframe for this return is unclear.
  • Concerns are raised about the optimism of the video report, with participants questioning the accuracy of the job return projections and the factors cited, such as shipping costs and logistics.
  • There is discussion about currency manipulation, with some participants suggesting that the devaluation of the dollar relative to the yuan may have contributed to a self-correcting economic situation.
  • Some argue that China's economic growth has led to increased wages, which parallels the historical trend of high U.S. wages driving jobs overseas.
  • Participants express skepticism about the sustainability of the trend, with some suggesting that China's capacity for production remains significant and may counteract wage increases.
  • Logistical challenges associated with international shipping and inventory management are highlighted as factors influencing the decision to bring jobs back to the U.S.
  • One participant mentions the potential for political motivations behind calls to punish China, questioning the fairness of such actions given the economic context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons for the job return or the implications of currency manipulation and economic policies. Multiple competing views remain regarding the sustainability of the trend and the motivations behind U.S. actions towards China.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the timeframe for job returns and the accuracy of the factors cited in the video report. There are also unresolved questions regarding the impact of logistics and the broader economic environment on the job market.

DoggerDan
Link to news article: http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-15749625/overseas-jobs-come-home-26850542.html

Out of an estimated 4.5 million jobs lost to China over the last few decades, upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S. Cited factors include rapidly-rising Chinese wages, American productivity, and no overseas shipping charges.

I recall the video saying that American workers can produce up to 4x as much as their Chinese counterparts, but I think most of that is due to performance-enhancing manufacturing technology, rather than inherent productivity for each individual.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Proton Soup said:
that's funny, because they're also making noise again about china's currency manipulation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/07/b...-punish-china-over-currency-manipulation.html

so what happened? could it be that our dollar has become so devalued wrt the chinese currency that the problem has "self-corrected"? and won't punishing china now just push the situation even more back in our favor?

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't China peg the yuan to the dollar?
 
Proton Soup said:
so what happened? could it be that our dollar has become so devalued wrt the chinese currency that the problem has "self-corrected"? and won't punishing china now just push the situation even more back in our favor?

I've found most things in life are self-correcting and will find a new balance point when you leave well enough alone. Obviously, you wouldn't want to take that approach to your dirty dishes, but the video article mentioned China's prosperity resulted in increasing wages, which is a large factor in the shift back towards domestic jobs, much the same as high U.S. wages originally caused the trend to offshore and overseas manufacturing.
 
DoggerDan said:
Link to news article: http://news.yahoo.com/video/us-15749625/overseas-jobs-come-home-26850542.html

Out of an estimated 4.5 million jobs lost to China over the last few decades, upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S. Cited factors include rapidly-rising Chinese wages, American productivity, and no overseas shipping charges.

I recall the video saying that American workers can produce up to 4x as much as their Chinese counterparts, but I think most of that is due to performance-enhancing manufacturing technology, rather than inherent productivity for each individual.

The video report seems a tad optomistic on some areas. Upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S - that is a projection not a fact, and in what time frame, 1 year, 10 years. And as for overseas shipping charges - that is miniscule compared to distribution costs to individual stores in addition to highway transportation costs from the manufacturing plant to distribution center.


I would bet that logistics has a part to play here also for certain goods and certainly not all. What the video report does not mention that there is no border to cross, and subsequently no customs clearance delays if your shipment of goods gets flagged to be checked at import. Time factors and secure delivery are not mentioned.

The written report is most likely more compehensive. News bites keep people watching.

I close one eye at financial and economic reports such as this. Next week another report will come out that 2 million jobs are being lost oversea due to some other factor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
256bits said:
The video report seems a tad optomistic on some areas. Upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S - that is a projection not a fact, and in what time frame, 1 year, 10 years.

I know. Not clear. An economist friend says "4 years for parity."

We'll see.
 
DoggerDan said:
I've found most things in life are self-correcting and will find a new balance point when you leave well enough alone. Obviously, you wouldn't want to take that approach to your dirty dishes, but the video article mentioned China's prosperity resulted in increasing wages, which is a large factor in the shift back towards domestic jobs, much the same as high U.S. wages originally caused the trend to offshore and overseas manufacturing.

thing is, though, it seems like they're just piling on, now. the imbalance is correcting, but there is this extra incentive now to actually punish china. why is that? what has china done to deserve getting a double whammy? one possibility is that they've done nothing, but this is just politicians getting scared of where the US economy is going, so let's start an economic war for our own benefit.

or maybe it's something else? like maybe retaliation for china trying to move in on our turf and http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/05/27/chinas_port_in_pakistan" on assets we've spilt blood over?

what else could this be about?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
I believe the transportation cost, but not the wages argument. Enormous amounts of China are still that much underdeveloped that it should be easy to build factories.

This effect probably, IMO, has more to do with that I expect money has become more expensive. With the financial crisis and the local debts, getting the money to build factories must have become more difficult.

It will probably just blow over. The capacity of the Chinese is just too large to see any real competitive rise in wages any time soon.
 
  • #11
256bits said:
The video report seems a tad optomistic on some areas. Upwards of 3 million are returning to the U.S - that is a projection not a fact, and in what time frame, 1 year, 10 years. And as for overseas shipping charges - that is miniscule compared to distribution costs to individual stores in addition to highway transportation costs from the manufacturing plant to distribution center.


I would bet that logistics has a part to play here also for certain goods and certainly not all. What the video report does not mention that there is no border to cross, and subsequently no customs clearance delays if your shipment of goods gets flagged to be checked at import. Time factors and secure delivery are not mentioned.

The written report is most likely more compehensive. News bites keep people watching.

I close one eye at financial and economic reports such as this. Next week another report will come out that 2 million jobs are being lost oversea due to some other factor.

Sound objections. I'll just add that, in spite of the low cost of international shipping, it does entail some logistical drawbacks beyond time lag. You need to contract whole 20' or 40' containers to reach proper cost economies, which isn't good for just-in-time inventory in many cases. Often you'll also need to disemburse full FOB costs (product, shipping and handling, port dues) up front, possibly on a higher unit count than that needed by immediate sales, which is no good for cash flow. In one case I know personally, these two factors combined to require a higher capital need than a third world start-up, financed by a US company, could handle, so the business model became inviable. The product to be imported was made in China; investors are now considering making the units locally.

At any rate, this isn't the first I've heard of goods becoming once again more economical to source in the US. Been happening with cheap plastics for some time, iirc.
 
  • #12
Proton Soup said:
one possibility is that they've done nothing, but this is just politicians getting scared of where the US economy is going, so let's start an economic war for our own benefit.

I think there's more to it than that. As some have mentioned, the U.S. doesn't like it when other countries enact policies which effect our own economy.

or maybe it's something else? like maybe retaliation for china trying to move in on our turf and http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/05/27/chinas_port_in_pakistan" on assets we've spilt blood over?

Could be. Then again, that's mostly our fault for handing them the pink slip to our country.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
DoggerDan said:
I recall the video saying that American workers can produce up to 4x as much as their Chinese counterparts, but I think most of that is due to performance-enhancing manufacturing technology, rather than inherent productivity for each individual.

I am sorry but many Americans do not work all that hard, especially when it comes to manufacturing or agricultural jobs. Look at Alabama and other southern states- farmers have issues getting people who are *willing* to work hard.

This brings up the question whether all our socialistic props like unions, minimum wage, health care negatively influence American productivity. Really, if you want to buy shoes for forty bucks you cannot really make them in the US.
 
  • #14
SunnyBoyNY said:
This brings up the question whether all our socialistic props like unions, minimum wage, health care negatively influence American productivity.

I think that's an excellent question to bring up. It's my observation they do negatively influence American productivity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
31
Views
10K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K