MHB 311.1.5.14 Use vectors to describe this set as a line in R^4

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Set Vectors
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Screenshot 2020-12-23 at 11.41.43 AM.png

ok, just now looking at some examples of how to do this $x_4$ is just a row with all zeros
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok don't see any takers on this one but here is a book example that might help, so we have...

$x_1+3x_4, \quad x_2=8+x_4, \quad x_3 =2-5x_4$ with $x_4$ free

$x=\begin{bmatrix}x_1\\x_2\\x_3\\x_4\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}3x_4\\8+x_4\\2-5x_4\\x_4\end{bmatrix}
=\begin{bmatrix}0\\8\\2\\0\end{bmatrix}= ...$

hopefully so far
Screenshot 2020-12-26 at 1.09.45 PM.png
 
Frankly it looks to me like you have no idea what you are supposed to be doing!

Yes, since we are told that "[math]x_1= 3x_4[/math], [math]x_2= 8+ x_4[/math], and [math]x_3= 2- 5x_4[/math] we have immediately that [math]\begin{bmatrix}x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \\ x_4 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} 3x_4 \\ 8+ x_4 \\ 2- 5x_4 \\ x_4 \end{bmatrix}[/math].

But why then did you set [math]x_4[/math] to 0?? The problem says that [math]x_4[/math] is "free" which means that it can be any number. Saying that a number is "free" certainly does NOT mean that it is 0!

I would say that [math]\begin{bmatrix} 3x_4 \\ 8+ x_4 \\ 2- 5x_4 \\ x_4 \end{bmatrix}[/math] is a perfectly good answer but some people might prefer to replace the "coordinate", [math]x_4[/math] with the "parameter", t:
[math]\begin{bmatrix} 3t \\ 8+ t \\ 2- 5t \\ t \end{bmatrix}[/math].

Some would prefer to write that as
[math]\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 8 \\ 2 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}+\begin{bmatrix} 3 \\ 1 \\ -5 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}t[/math].
 
Last edited:
yes it is new material to me
 
Then you need to start by learning the basic definitions!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K