3D Laplace solution in Cylindrical Coordinates For a Hollow Cylindrical Tube

jkthejetplane
Messages
29
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Find the general series solution for laplace in cylindrical coordinates
Relevant Equations
for this i have always used (s,phi,z)
Here is the initial problem and my attempt at getting Laplace solution. I get lost near the end and after some research, ended up with the Bessel equation and function. I don't completely understand what this is or even if this i the direction I go in.
This is a supplemental thing that I want to nail down for review to get my brain up to speed again for this semester

1630520241982.png


1630521135094.png
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are missing a term from your final equation.

The solution must be periodic in \phi, so the dependence will be \Phi&#039;&#039; = -n^2\Phi. You do then have Z&#039;&#039; = CZ, but at this point there's no reason to believe that C \geq 0. So your radial dependence satisfies <br /> s^2 S&#039;&#039; + s S&#039; + (Cs^2 - n^2)S = 0. Setting k = |C|^{1/2} and x = ks turns this into <br /> x^2 \frac{d^2S}{dx^2} + x \frac{dS}{dx} + (\operatorname{sgn}(C) x^2 - n^2)S = 0 which is the Bessel equation if C &gt; 0 and the modified Bessel equation if C &lt; 0. If C = 0 then the dependence on z is Az + B and the radial dependence is s^\alpha where \alpha depends on n.

The Bessel functions are oscillatory with amplitude decaying to zero as x \to \infty. The Bessel function of the first kind ,J_n, is bounded at the origin with J_0(0) = 1 and J_n(0) = 0 for n \geq 1. The Bessel function of the second kind, Y_n, blows up at the origin. The modified Bessel functions are monotonic and positive with the modified function of the first kind, I_n, being bounded at the origin with I_0(0) = 1 and I_n(0) = 0 for n \geq 1 and increasing without limit as x \to \infty, and the modified function of the second kind, K_n, blowing up at the origin and decaying to 0 as x \to \infty.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, Delta2 and ergospherical
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top