3D Recipricol Space Mapping of Nanowires by using x-rays

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the methodology for obtaining a 3D reciprocal space map of nanowires using X-ray scattering techniques. The user inquires about the effectiveness of rotating the sample in the omega direction versus adjusting the alpha angle to capture the necessary data. It is established that for randomly oriented nanowires, varying the alpha angle is essential for accurate mapping, as rotating the sample in omega will not yield additional information. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between scattering angles and sample orientation in X-ray diffraction analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • X-ray scattering principles
  • Understanding of reciprocal space mapping
  • Familiarity with 2D detector data interpretation
  • Knowledge of nanowire orientation effects on diffraction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research X-ray diffraction techniques for nanostructured materials
  • Explore the impact of sample orientation on X-ray scattering data
  • Learn about advanced 3D reciprocal space mapping methods
  • Investigate the use of 2D detectors in X-ray scattering experiments
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in materials science, physicists studying nanostructures, and professionals involved in X-ray diffraction analysis will benefit from this discussion.

poul
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey

I have a x-ray setup as in the figure, where alpha is the angles between the incoming x-ray beam and the sample. The x-ray are scattered, and measured by a 2D detector in the two outgoing angles. From this i will get a "slice" of the 3D recipricol map. If a want a 3D map, i think i will get nothing by rotating the sample i omega, since the nanowire planes have random orientation in omega. Instead i should change alpha. I this the right procedure?

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/32/setupso.jpg/

http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/32/setupso.jpg/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have a powder sample (or randomly oriented nanowires), then all diffraction data you get will only depend on the scattering angle, i.e. the angle between the inciden beam and the exit beam (which you can calculate from the position on the 2D detector).

If you have a monolayer of nanotubes then you signal will also depend on the angle between the incident beam and the substrate.

In both cases, rotating the sample about the substrate surface normal will not give any new information, except if the nanotubes are aligned with some substrate direction (steps, ...).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K