3rd degree exponential polynomial

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a transcendental equation involving exponential functions, specifically the equation 2e^{3x} - e^{2x} - 2e^x = 1. Participants explore various substitutions and transformations to simplify the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the substitution u = e^x to transform the original equation into a polynomial form. Some express uncertainty about the correctness of the derived polynomial and its solutions. Others question the original problem statement and its implications.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights and alternative approaches. Some have pointed out potential errors in the transformations, while others have confirmed the validity of certain steps. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the polynomial's solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of hyperbolic functions and their exponential definitions, which adds layers of difficulty to the problem. The original question's clarity is questioned, impacting the discussion's focus.

W3bbo
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] 3rd degree exponential polynomial

Homework Statement



Derived from the original question:

"Reduce to find x"

[tex]2e^{3x} - e^{2x} - 2e^x = 1[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Inspection fails, since the answer is transcendental. I have the answer from my CAS, but I can't figure it out myself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you make the substitution u=e^x, then the equation reduces to [itex]2u^3-u^2-2u-1=0[/itex]. Can you solve this?
 
I haven't worked the thing out , but you might try letting [tex]u=e^x[/tex] and try that.
What was the original question?
I'll play with it more here after we eat.
CC
 
cristo said:
If you make the substitution u=e^x, then the equation reduces to [itex]2u^3-u^2-2u-1=0[/itex]. Can you solve this?

No, that's my problem. :)
 
W3bbo said:
No, that's my problem. :)

Are you sure that's the right equation? It doesn't have "nice" solutions. What is the original question?
 
cristo said:
Are you sure that's the right equation? It doesn't have "nice" solutions. What is the original question?
It really doesn't, lol.
 
cristo said:
Are you sure that's the right equation? It doesn't have "nice" solutions. What is the original question?

The original question was "Find x, using the definitions of the hyperbolics in terms of exponentials"

...from this expression:

[tex]2 = {\mathop{\rm Cosech}\nolimits} \left( x \right) - 2{\mathop{\rm Coth}\nolimits} \left( x \right)[/tex]

Here's my working so far, reducing down to the final polynomial:

[tex]\displaylines{<br /> {\mathop{\rm Cosech}\nolimits} \left( x \right) = {2 \over {e^x - e^{ - x} }} \cr <br /> {\mathop{\rm Coth}\nolimits} \left( x \right) = {{{\mathop{\rm Cosh}\nolimits} \left( x \right)} \over {{\mathop{\rm Sinh}\nolimits} \left( x \right)}} = {{{\textstyle{1 \over 2}}\left( {e^x + e^{ - x} } \right)} \over {{\textstyle{1 \over 2}}\left( {e^x - e^{ - x} } \right)}} = {{e^{2x} + 1} \over {e^{2x} - 1}} \cr}[/tex]

[tex]\displaylines{<br /> 2 = {\mathop{\rm Cosech}\nolimits} \left( x \right) - 2{\mathop{\rm Coth}\nolimits} \left( x \right) \cr <br /> = {2 \over {e^x - e^{ - x} }} - 2\left( {{{e^{2x} + 1} \over {e^{2x} - 1}}} \right) \cr <br /> 1 = {1 \over {e^x - e^{ - x} }} - {{e^{2x} + 1} \over {e^{2x} - 1}} \cr <br /> = {{e^{2x} - 1} \over {\left( {e^x - e^{ - x} } \right)\left( {e^{2x} - 1} \right)}} - \left( {{{e^{2x} + 1} \over {e^{2x} - 1}} \times {{e^x - e^{ - x} } \over {e^x - e^{ - x} }}} \right) \cr <br /> = {{e^{2x} - 1} \over {e^{3x} - 2e^x + e^{ - x} }} - {{e^{3x} - e^{ - x} } \over {e^{3x} - 2e^x + e^{ - x} }} \cr <br /> = {{e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} + e^{ - x} } \over {e^{3x} - 2e^x + e^{ - x} }} \cr <br /> e^{3x} - 2e^x + e^{ - x} = e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} + e^{ - x} \cr <br /> e^{3x} - 2e^x = e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} \cr <br /> 2e^{3x} - e^{2x} - 2e^x = 1 \cr}[/tex]
 
Your mistake's in your last line!
[tex]e^{3x} - 2e^x = e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} \Rightarrow 2e^{3x}- e^{2x} - 2e^x=-1[/tex], so then the equation you want to solve, letting u=e^x, is [itex]2u^3-u^2-2u+1=0[/itex], which does have nice solutions!
 
cristo said:
Your mistake's in your last line!
[tex]e^{3x} - 2e^x = e^{2x} - 1 - e^{3x} \Rightarrow 2e^{3x}- e^{2x} - 2e^x=-1[/tex], so then the equation you want to solve, letting u=e^x, is [itex]2u^3-u^2-2u+1=0[/itex], which does have nice solutions!

Indeed, that solved it. Thank you.

I have one more question to ask:

I need to show that:

[tex]{\mathop{\rm Artanh}\nolimits} \left( {{\mathop{\rm Sin}\nolimits} \left( {{\textstyle{\pi \over 4}}} \right)} \right) = {\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {1 + \sqrt 2 } \right)[/tex]

Here's my working so far, I don't know where to go from the bottom line:

[tex]$\displaylines{<br /> {\mathop{\rm Artanh}\nolimits} \left( x \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{x + 1} \over {x - 1}}} \right) \cr <br /> {\mathop{\rm Sin}\nolimits} \left( {{\textstyle{\pi \over 4}}} \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over {\sqrt 2 }}} \cr <br /> {\mathop{\rm Artanh}\nolimits} \left( {{\mathop{\rm Sin}\nolimits} \left( {{\textstyle{\pi \over 4}}} \right)} \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{1 + {\textstyle{1 \over {\sqrt 2 }}}} \over {1 - {\textstyle{1 \over {\sqrt 2 }}}}}} \right) \cr <br /> = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{{{\sqrt 2 + 1} \over {\sqrt 2 }}} \over {{{\sqrt 2 - 1} \over {\sqrt 2 }}}}} \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{\left( {\sqrt 2 + 1} \right)\sqrt 2 } \over {\left( {\sqrt 2 - 1} \right)\sqrt 2 }}} \right) \cr <br /> = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {{{\sqrt 2 + 1} \over {\sqrt 2 - 1}}} \right) \cr <br /> {{\sqrt 2 + 1} \over {\sqrt 2 - 1}} = {{\sqrt 2 + 1} \over {\sqrt 2 - 1}} \times {{1 + \sqrt 2 } \over {1 + \sqrt 2 }} \cr <br /> = {{3 + 2\sqrt 2 } \over 1} = 3 + 2\sqrt 2 \cr <br /> {\mathop{\rm Artanh}\nolimits} \left( {{\mathop{\rm Sin}\nolimits} \left( {{\textstyle{\pi \over 4}}} \right)} \right) = {\textstyle{1 \over 2}}{\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {3 + 2\sqrt 2 } \right) \cr <br /> = {\mathop{\rm Ln}\nolimits} \left( {\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 } } \right) \cr <br /> = \cr} $<br /> [/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
W3bbo said:
The original question was "Find x, using the definitions of the hyperbolics in terms of exponentials"
WOW, way to leave that out. Next time you ask for help, make sure you post the whole question.
 
  • #11
for your second question, you only need to show that
[tex]\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 } =1+\sqrt2[/tex]
and indeed:
[tex]\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 }=\sqrt {1 + 2\sqrt 2 + 2 }=\sqrt {1^2 + 2\sqrt2 + (\sqrt2)^2 }=\sqrt {(1+\sqrt2)^2}=1+\sqrt2[/tex]
 
  • #12
Kurret said:
for your second question, you only need to show that
[tex]\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 } =1+\sqrt2[/tex]
and indeed:
[tex]\sqrt {3 + 2\sqrt 2 }=\sqrt {1 + 2\sqrt 2 + 2 }=\sqrt {1^2 + 2\sqrt2 + (\sqrt2)^2 }=\sqrt {(1+\sqrt2)^2}=1+\sqrt2[/tex]

Whoa, that's voodoo. How did you figure that out?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K