3x3 or 4x4 square tubing bending strength

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the bending strength of square tubing, specifically comparing 3"x3" 1/4" wall and 4"x4" 3/16" wall options for constructing a hoist beam with a 10' span. Participants explore calculations related to bending moments, material properties, and load capacities, while also considering alternative construction methods.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the strength comparison between 3"x3" and 4"x4" square tubing for a hoist beam.
  • Another participant suggests calculating the bending moment of inertia for each cross section to determine strength, emphasizing the importance of material properties.
  • It is noted that most box tubing is A36 steel, which may influence calculations.
  • A participant proposes an alternative construction method using three 2x6x10 yellow pine boards, aiming to support a weight of 1500 lbs.
  • Concerns are raised about safety, with a suggestion to hire an engineer for the design of the hoist beam.
  • One participant claims that a 4"x4" hollow tube with 3/16" walls should hold 1500 lbs, but acknowledges that this depends on factors like drilled holes and beam support.
  • Calculations are provided showing that the 4"x4" beam has a higher moment of inertia (6.59 in^4) compared to the 3"x3" beam (3.16 in^4), indicating less deflection.
  • A participant admits to an error in their maximum force calculation, realizing they underestimated the load capacity by a factor of 2.
  • Another participant asks for equations or tables related to cantilevered beams and computations for various sizes and wall thicknesses of square tubing.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations and safety considerations, with no consensus reached on the best approach or final recommendations for the hoist beam design.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations and assumptions regarding material properties and load conditions remain unresolved, and the discussion reflects varying levels of expertise among participants.

websocket
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I need to erect a hoist beam with a 10' span using square tubing. Which is stronger, 3"x3" 1/4" wall or 4"x4" x 3/16"? Also, how much weight could I lift at the center?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To determine which is stronger, all you have to do is calculate the bending moment of inertia for each cross section. The higher the bending moment of inertia, the stronger the beam is in bending. To calculate the moment of inertia for a hollow tube, calculate the MOI for a solid tube, and subtract the MOI for the hole in the middle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_moment_of_area" (a.k.a. moment of inertia)

To figure out how much weight it can hold, you need to read up a bit on beam bending theory, and you will need a bit more information about what kind of material the tube is made out of:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam_bending"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Most box tubing is A36. Other than that, you should be able to plug and chug with what M_E gave you
 
Way over my head. Another option is to nail three 2x6x10 yellow pine boards together. I'm hoping this will support lifting 1500 lbs.
 
Well it sounds to me like you will want to hire an engineer to design this "crane" for you then... especially since it sounds like a safety-critical item.

It does look like a 4"x4" hollow tube with 3/16" walls should be able to hold 1500lb without too much trouble, but it will depend and what kind of holes are drilled in it and how the beam is suppoorted at the ends.

... and a 4"x4" tube with 3/16" walls is about twice as strong in bending as a 3"x3" tube with .25" walls.
 
Last edited:
In terms of just what will bend less,
3x3x.25 Ix = 3.16 in^4
4x4x.188 Ix = 6.59 in^4

So the 4x4 beam will be deflecting less. I attached some quick calculations. The first calculation is calculating the load required at the center of the beam to get to yield (You don't want to go that high). Then using that load, a deflection at the center of the beam is calculated. These are pretty rough considering the end conditions, but they can be a guide for you.
 

Attachments

Thank you to everyone. This project is only temporary. I'm building a new floating dock on top of my old dock. I just need to raise and slide it ever so gently into the water. You know what they say. It only costs a little bit more to do it yourself.
 
Last edited:
Fred- It looks like you're off by a factor of 2 in your max force calculation, the beams should be able to put up with about twice as much force as you're quoting...
 

Attachments

Oh yeah. I forgot the factor of 2 in my calculation for M. Whoops.
 
  • #10
"That factor of two will get you every time," a wise engineering professor once told me... :wink:
 
  • #11
Hi Folks, Is there a corresponding equation (or equations) for a cantilevered beam, and tables that someone can point to that have the values needed to run the computations for different sizes and wall thickness of square tubing (mild steel I think in my case)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K